Keywords
public management in the field of education
general secondary education institution
modernization of education
development of public management mechanisms
strategic approaches
management processes
digital transformation
digitalization
quality of education
How to Cite
Abstract
The article examines the features of the digital transformation of general secondary education institutions. The relevance of the study is due to the rapid development of information and communication technologies and the need for secondary education institutions to adapt to new management conditions. The goal is to determine effective strategic approaches to the digital transformation of secondary education institutions and the development of public management mechanisms. The study uses such methods as the analysis of scientific and methodological literature and regulatory legal acts, modeling and forecasting methods, and a systemic and structural approach. Modern theoretical approaches to the digital transformation of general secondary education institutions are analyzed. Key strategic guidelines and models for the digitalization of general secondary education institutions in the context of public management have been identified. The concept of “digital school” is considered, in particular, the main characteristics and strategic guidelines. The main models of digitalization of secondary education institutions in the context of public management are presented. The main attention is focused on the role of state educational policy in the formation of digital strategies for secondary education institutions. The mechanisms of public management in secondary education institutions in the digital environment are characterized. The relationship between the level of digitalization of secondary education institutions and indicators of the quality of educational services is identified. Strategic approaches to the development of digitalization of secondary education institutions are systematized. The prospects for the development of digital management in secondary education at the regional and national levels are determined. The conclusions establish that the digital transformation of secondary education institutions has a positive effect on the efficiency of management and educational processes, increases the quality of education, promotes the professional development of teachers and improves communication between participants in the educational process, while its success is determined by the level of technical equipment, digital competencies of personnel and the presence of a strategic development plan for the institution. Future research should be aimed at assessing the effectiveness of new digital tools in secondary education institutions, studying their impact on educational outcomes and management processes, as well as developing methodological recommendations for the integration of digital technologies, taking into account the human resource potential, resource provision and specifics of secondary education institutions.
References
1. Dushchenko, O. S. (2021). Suchasnyi stan tsyfrovoi transformatsii osvity [The current state of digital transformation of education]. Fizyko-matematychna osvita – Physics and Mathematics Education, 2(28), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2021-028-2-007 (in Ukrainian).
2. Horbanova, V. O. (2025). Tsyfrova transformatsiia zakladiv osvity: stratehichni pidkhody do upravlinnia rozvytkom [Digital transformation of educational institutions: strategic approaches to development management]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: “Ekonomika i menedzhment”, (64), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-2675/2025-64-3 (in Ukrainian).
3. Drokina, A. (2024). STEM-osvita yak efektyvnyi napriam realizatsii kliuchovykh polozhen kontseptsii novoi ukrainskoi shkoly [STEM education as an effective direction for implementing the key provisions of the concept of a new Ukrainian school]. Osvita. Innovatyka. Praktyka – Education. Innovation. Practice, 12(3), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol12i3-003 (in Ukrainian).
4. Yurchenko, K. V., Semenikhina, O. V. Yurchenko, K. V., & Semenikhina, O. V. (2022). STEM-osvita na vidkrytykh osvitnikh platformakh [STEM education on open educational platforms]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky, (208), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2023-1-208-282-287 (in Ukrainian).
5. Huraliuk, A. (2022). Sotsialno-kulturni ta orhanizatsiino-pedahohichni peredumovy tsyfrovoi transformatsii osvity [Socio-cultural and organizational-pedagogical prerequisites for the digital transformation of education]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Chernihivskyi kolehium” imeni T. H. Shevchenka. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky, (18), 15–20. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vnuchkpn_2022_18_5 (in Ukrainian).
6. Marienko, M., & Sukhikh, A. (2022). Orhanizatsiia navchalnoho protsesu u ZZSO zasobamy tsyfrovykh tekhnolohii pid chas voiennoho stanu [Organization of the educational process in the ZZSO using digital technologies during martial law]. Ukrainskyi Pedahohichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, (2), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2022-2-31-37 (in Ukrainian).
7. Shparyk, O. (2022). Tsyfrova transformatsiia serednoi osvity: spilni stratehichni vektory SShA ta krain YeS [Digital transformation of secondary education: common strategic vectors of the USA and EU countries]. Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, (3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2022-3-33-43 (in Ukrainian).
8. Bereda, T.M. (2022). Tsyfrovizatsiia yak faktor rozvytku ta vdoskonalennia dystantsiinoi serednoi osvity [Digitalization as a factor in the development and improvement of distance secondary education]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho, 33(72)5), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.32782/TNU-2663-6468/2022.5/03 (in Ukrainian).
9. Ivanii, O. M., & Hanzha, V. V. (2024). Tsyfrova transformatsiia osvity yak obiekt derzhavnoho upravlinnia v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Digital transformation of education as an object of public administration in the context of globalization]. Pravo ta derzhavne upravlinnia – Law and public administration, (1), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.32782/pdu.2024.1.23 (in Ukrainian).
10. Postupna, O. V., & Torpan, M. Yu. (2023). Tsyfrova transformatsiia v publichnomu upravlinni osvitoiu: mozhlyvosti ta zahrozy [Digital transformation in public education management: Opportunities and threats]. In S. M. Dombrovska (Ed.), Publichne upravlinnia u sferi tsyvilnoho zakhystu: osvita, nauka, praktyka – Public administration in the field of civil protection: Education, science, practice: Zbirnyk materialiv mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi internet-konferentsii (Kharkiv, March 16) (pp. 44–47). NUTsZU. https://nuczu.edu.ua/images/topmenu/science/konferentsii/2023/Publichne_upravlinnya.pdf (in Ukrainian)
11. Pozychaniuk, K. I. (2024). Tsyfrovi tekhnolohii yak mekhanizm publichnoho upravlinnia osvitoiu v umovakh formuvannia zasad staloho rozvytku [Digital technologies as a mechanism for public education management in the context of forming the foundations of sustainable development]. In Elektronni informatsiini resursy: stvorennia, vykorystannia, dostup ta upravlinnia – Electronic information resources: Creation, use, access and management: Zbirnyk materialiv Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi Internet-konferentsii (Sumy/Vinnytsia, November 20–21) (pp. 136–137). NIKO / KZVO “Vinnytska akademiia bezperervnoi osvity”. https://docs.academia.vn.ua/bitstream/handle/ (in Ukrainian).
12. Umanets, V. O. (2023). Tsyfrovizatsiia osvitnikh ta upravlinskykh protsesiv u zakladakh profesiinoi (profesiino-tekhnichnoi) osvity [Digitalization of educational and management processes in vocational (vocational and technical) education institutions]. Nauka i tekhnika sohodni – Science and technology today, 2(16), 321–336. http://perspectives.pp.ua/index.php/nts/article/download/3822/3843/3844
13. Verbovskyi, I. A. (2024). Efektyvnist tsyfrovizatsii v upravlinni osvitnimy resursamy: analiz ta stratehii optymizatsii [The effectiveness of digitalization in educational resource management: analysis and optimization strategies]. Akademichni vizii – Academic visions, (27). http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10471716 (in Ukrainian).
14. European Commission. (2021). Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/actions
15. Kovalenko, O., & Kutelmakh, I. (2025). Tsyfrova transformatsiia profesiinoho rozvytku vchyteliv u politytsi YuNESKO: mizhnarodni oriientyry ta ukrainskyi kontekst [Digital Transformation of Teacher Professional Development in UNESCO Policy: International References and Ukrainian Context]. Visnyk Kafedry YuNESKO “Neperervna profesiina osvita KhKhI stolittia” – Bulletin of the UNESCO Chair “Continuing Professional Education for the 21st Century”, (11), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.35387/ucj.1(11).2025.0001 (in Ukrainian).
16. Vozniuk, Ya. (2025). Orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichni pidkhody ta modeli tsyfrovizatsii osvitnoi diialnosti zakladiv vyshchoi osvity [Organizational and technological approaches and models of digitalization of educational activities of higher education institutions]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, (71). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-71-72 (in Ukrainian).
17. Liashenko, O., Spirin, O., Lytvynova, S., Pinchuk, O., Ovcharuk, O., & Sukhikh, A. (2024). Kontseptualni zasady tsyfrovizatsii osvitnoho seredovyshcha zakladu zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Conceptual principles of digitalization of the educational environment of a general secondary education institution]. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia – Information technology and learning tools, 102(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v102i4.5829 (in Ukrainian).
18. Vseosvita. (2024). Naipopuliarnishi osvitni platformy dlia orhanizatsii dystantsiinoho navchannia [The most popular educational platforms for organizing distance learning]. https://vseosvita.ua/blogs/naipopuliarnishi-osvitni-platformy-dlia-orhanizatsii-dystantsiinoho-navchannia-102669.html (in Ukrainian).
19. Kanishchev, O. I., Berehova, M. I., & Dementiev, I. O. (2025). Vplyv pedahohichnykh pidkhodiv ta tekhnolohii u dystantsiinomu navchanni [The impact of pedagogical approaches and technologies in distance learning]. Akademichni vizii – Academic visions, (43). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15620373 (in Ukrainian).
20. Hoi, N. V., Nesterenko, S. V., & Drahan, O. B. (2021). Stratehichne planuvannia yak osnova rozvytku zakladu fakhovoi peredvyshchoi osvity [Strategic planning as the basis for the development of a professional pre-higher education institution]. Perspektyvy ta innovatsii nauky – Prospects and innovations of science, 5(5), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-4952 (in Ukrainian).
21. Hoi, N., Zhuk, O., & Basarab, V. (2021). Model upravlinnia systemoiu motyvatsii personalu v zakladakh osvity [Model of management of the personnel motivation system in educational institutions]. Osvitni obrii – Educational horizons, 53(2), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.15330/obrii.53.2.56-61 (in Ukrainian).
22. Institute of Educational Analytics of Ukraine. (2025). Ukraina: tsyfrova transformatsiia osvity yak stratehichnyi shliakh do stiikosti ta innovatsii [Ukraine: Digital transformation of education as a strategic path to sustainability and innovation]. https://eurydice.iea.gov.ua/news/ukraine-digital-transformation-of-education-as-a-strategic-path-to-resilience-and-innovation/
23. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2021). Strategic action plan of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine by 2027. https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/docs%20osvita/zagalna%20serednia/Strategy.MON%202027.12.03_compressed.ENG.pdf
24. Sokolova, E. T. (2022). Systema innovatsiinykh form menedzhmentu yak mekhanizm rehuliuvannia publichnoho upravlinnia osvitoiu [The system of innovative forms of management as a mechanism for regulating public education management]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk – Tavria Scientific Bulletin, (1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.32851/tnv-pub.2022.1.10 (in Ukrainian).
25. Chubinska, N. (2022). Kliuchovi aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia osvitoiu v suchasnykh umovakh rozvytku [Key aspects of public education management in modern development conditions]. InterConf, (103). https://ojs.ukrlogos.in.ua/index.php/interconf/article/view/18870 (in Ukrainian).
26. Shvardak, M. (2025). Informatsiini systemy efektyvnoho upravlinnia zakladom osvity [Information systems for effective management of an educational institution]. Humanitarni studii: istoriia ta pedahohika – Humanities: History and Pedagogy, (1), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.35774/gsip2025.01.220 (in Ukrainian).
27. Institute of Educational Analytics of Ukraine. (2025). Prohramno aparatnyi kompleks «Avtomatyzovanyi informatsiinyi kompleks osvitnoho menedzhmentu» (PAK «AIKOM») [Hardware and software complex “Automated information complex of educational management” (PAK “AICOM”)]. https://iea.gov.ua/diyalnist/administruvannya-naczionalnyh-informaczijnyh-system-ta-osvitnih-platform/programno-aparatnyj-kompleks-avtomatyzovanyj-informaczijnyj-kompleks-osvitnogo-menedzhmentu-pak-aikom/ (in Ukrainian).
28. Verbovskyi, I. A., & Makhnevych, D. S. (2024). Teoretychni aspekty tsyfrovizatsii upravlinnia planuvanniam osvitnoho protsesu v zakladakh zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Theoretical aspects of digitalization of educational process planning management in secondary education institutions]. Nauka i tekhnika sohodni – Science and technology today, 8(36), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2024-8(36) (in Ukrainian).
29. Zvarych, H. V. (2023). Kryterii, pokaznyky ta indykatory monitorynhu, ekspertyzy ta otsiniuvannia yakosti osvitnikh posluh u zakladakh zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Criteria, indicators and metrics for monitoring, expertise and evaluation of the quality of educational services in general secondary education institutions]. Imidzh suchasnoho pedahoha – The image of a modern teacher, 5(194), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.33272/2522-9729-2020-5(194)-14-20 (in Ukrainian).
30. Kolomiiets, L. V., Kyselova, O. I., Hrabovskyi, O. V., & Haber, A. A. (2024). Protsesna model vymiriuvannia i otsinky yakosti nadannia navchalnykh posluh [Process model for measuring and assessing the quality of educational services]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Odeskoi derzhavnoi akademii tekhnichnoho rehuliuvannia ta yakosti – Collection of scientific papers of the Odessa State Academy of Technical Regulation and Quality, 2(25), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.32684/2412-5288-2024-2-25-14-22 (in Ukrainian).
31. Onats, O., & Chyzhevskyi, B. (2022). Orhanizatsiino-pravovi umovy derzhavno-hromadskoho upravlinnia zakladamy osvity na zasadakh partnerskoi vzaiemodii: zakonodavche zabezpechennia [Organizational and legal conditions of state and public management of educational institutions on the basis of partnership: legislative support]. Pedahohichni innovatsii: idei, realii, perspektyvy – Pedagogical Innovations: Ideas, Realities, Prospects, (2). 55–66. https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2020-2(29)-55-66 (in Ukrainian).
32. Lukina, T. O. (2020). Upravlinnia yakistiu zahalnoi serednoi osvity: navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk [Quality management of general secondary education: a teaching and methodological manual]. Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka. https://library.megu.edu.ua:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/3621 (in Ukrainian).
33. Anisimov, V. (2025). Problemy ta perspektyvy vprovadzhennia mekhanizmiv monitorynhu yakosti osvity na rivni zakladu zahalnoi serednoi osvity v Ukraini [Problems and prospects of implementing mechanisms for monitoring the quality of education at the level of general secondary education institutions in Ukraine]. Pidpryiemnytstvo ta innovatsii – Entrepreneurship and Innovation, (36), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/36.10 (in Ukrainian).
34. Chyzhevskyi, B. H. (2021). Metodolohichni zasady demokratychnoho upravlinnia zakladom osvity [Methodological principles of democratic governance of an educational institution]. Osvitnia analityka Ukrainy – Educational analytics of Ukraine, 1(12), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2021-1-5-20 (in Ukrainian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Halyna Belya, Nataliia Hoi