Abstract
This paper looks at the characteristics of adaptive innovation oversight amidst increasing ambiguity. Conventional methods for managing innovation are not sufficiently potent amid swift shifts, necessitating the adoption of adaptable and nimble governance frameworks. In this setting, the resilience perspective holds special significance, as it secures the steadfastness of enterprises and their capacity to rebound and progress during turbulent times. The objective is to theoretically validate and formulate the tenets of adaptive innovation governance rooted in the resilience concept, alongside pinpointing methods for boosting the firmness and productivity of organizations amidst the imperceptibility and unpredictability of the outer surroundings. The study seeks to discover methods to enhance adaptive innovation governance by incorporating the resilience perspective to boost the steadiness and adaptability of entities amid unpredictability and obscurity in the external environment. Conceptual frameworks for innovation oversight are examined, and their shift under conditions of mounting uncertainty is ascertained. The core of adaptive direction is unveiled, and its function in guaranteeing the potency of organizations' inventive endeavors is affirmed. The notion of resilience as a governance model is explored, and its main attributes in the scope of novel progress are defined. The setting of obscurity is described, and its effect on administrative selection-making procedures is established. Current instruments and methods (Agile, Lean, adaptable frameworks) that guarantee the flexibility of innovation direction are examined. Ways for incorporating the resilience perspective into a company's innovation management structure are established. The effect of corporate resilience on the rivalry and success of inventive endeavors is evaluated. Methodological strategies for judging the performance of flexible innovation management amid unpredictability are created. Actionable suggestions for applying the resilience concept in business operations are drafted, considering contemporary difficulties. Subsequent study ought to target elaborating the examination of real processes for applying the fortitude strategy in the innovation oversight framework. It is sensible to focus particular importance on examining industry-specific traits of employing such methods and how digital advancements affect augmenting corporate durability.
References
1. Protsak, K.V. (2026). Adaptatsiina systema menedzhmentu pidpryiemstva v umovakh ekstremalnoi nevyznachenosti [Adaptive enterprise management system in conditions of extreme uncertainty]. Ekonomichnyi prostir - Economic space, (211), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.211.49-54 (in Ukrainian)
2. Filyppova, S.V., & Vuhelman, P.V. (2025). Arkhitektura menedzhmentu stratehichnoi rezyliientnosti pidpryiemstv v umovakh polikryzovosti [Architecture of strategic resilience management of enterprises in conditions of polycrisis]. Ekonomika: realii chasu – Economics: realities of the times, 4(80), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19600150 (in Ukrainian)
3. Verbova, O. S. (2026). Samomenedzhment yak priorytetnyi chynnyk zabezpechennia stratehichnoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom v umovakh voiennykh vyklykiv [Self-management as a priority factor in ensuring strategic management of an enterprise in conditions of military challenges]. Aktualni pytannia ekonomichnykh nauk – Current Issues in Economic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19489224 (in Ukrainian)
4. Voronenko, V. I., & Omelianenko, V. A. (2026). Implementatsiia atrybutiv novoi ekonomiky v systemu tsyvilnoho zakhystu ta povoiennoho vidnovlennia [Implementation of the attributes of the new economy into the civil protection and post-war reconstruction system]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, (84). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2026-84-4 (in Ukrainian)
5. Dodon, O., & Synychenko, A.V. (2026). Adaptyvnyi menedzhment: osoblyvosti pryiniattia ta realizatsiia upravlinskykh rishen v umovakh nevyznachenosti [Adaptive management: features of making and implementing management decisions under conditions of uncertainty]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia – Economics and management organization, 4(60), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2025.4.4 (in Ukrainian)
6. Li, L., Zhang, J., Liu, C., Guan, Y., & Kang, W. (2025). Knowledge creation network in response to crisis: A static–dynamic framework for innovation network resilience from a dual-risk perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(6). 100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100825
7. Gao, W. (2025). The Effect of Organizational Resilience on Employee Innovation Behavior in A VUCA Environment: Evidence from Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 6(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v6n2.24
8. Machnik-Słomka, J., Pawłowska, E., & Penkala, M. (2024). Innovation management in the context of building organisational resilience. Organization and management series, (212), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2024.212.17
9. Toro-Gallego, C., Sapena-Bolufer, J., Plaza-Navas, M.-A., & Torres-Pruñonosa, J. (2025). The Science of Organisational Resilience: Decoding Its Intellectual Structure to Understand Foundations and Future. Administrative Sciences, 15(10), 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15100404
10. Łobejko, H. (2025). Enhancing resilience in small and medium-sized tourism enterprises: Leveraging dynamic capabilities for post-crisis recovery. Tourism and Hospitality Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584251388343
11. Hortovanyi, L., & Szepesi, B. (2026). Resilience and innovation: SME responses in global value chains under uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, (209), 116120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116120
12. Duan, F. (2025). Business Strategy and Global Uncertainty: A Framework for Resilience and Adaptation. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, (231), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.CAU28401
13. Szemző, H., Mosquera, J., Polyák, L., & Hayes, L. (2022). Flexibility and Adaptation: Creating a Strategy for Resilience. Sustainability, 14(5), 2688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052688
14. Lv, W.-D., Tian, D., Wei, Y., & Xi, R.-X. (2018). Innovation Resilience: A New Approach for Managing Uncertainties Concerned with Sustainable Innovation. Sustainability, 10(10), 3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103641
15. Garrido-Moreno, A., Martín-Rojas, R., & García-Morales, V. J. (2024). The key role of innovation and organizational resilience in improving business performance: A mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Information Management, (77), 102777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102777
16. Nemchenko, T. A. (2025). Synerhiia kreatyvnoho potentsialu ta adaptatsiinykh mekhanizmiv pidpryiemstva yak faktor zabezpechennia stratehichnoho rozvytku orhanizatsii [Synergy of creative potential and adaptation mechanisms of the enterprise as a factor in ensuring the strategic development of the organization]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient Economy, (4). http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2025.4.34 (in Ukrainian)
17. Bei, H. V., Synchenko, A. V., & Sisneros Munos, M. R. (2025). Menedzhment u chasy nevyznachenosti ta kryz: transformatsiia upravlinskoi paradyhmy Ukrainy [Management in times of uncertainty and crises: transformation of the management paradigm in Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (79). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-79-70)18 (in Ukrainian)
18. Khalina, V. Yu., & Kolbasynskyi, Yu. V. (2024). Teoretychne pidgruntia adaptyvnoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Theoretical basis of adaptive enterprise management]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (63). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-63-127 (in Ukrainian)
19. Fyliuk, H. M., & Keba, D. A. (2026). Operatsionalizatsiia rezylientnosti pidpryiemstva na osnovi metodolohii teorii obmezhen v umovakh BANI-realnosti [Operationalization of enterprise resilience based on the theory of constraints methodology in the BANI reality]. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky – Sustainable Economic Development, 1(58), 872–878. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2026-58-116 (in Ukrainian)
20. Perminova, S. O., & Chupryna, M. O. (2022). Rozvytok natsionalnoi innovatsiinoi ekosystemy v konteksti vzaiemodii subiektiv nauky i biznesu [Development of the national innovation ecosystem in the context of interaction between science and business entities]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (38). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-38-29 (in Ukrainian)
21. Shevchenko, V. (2025). Synerhiia agile-pidkhodu ta low-code tekhnolohii yak chynnyk pidvyshchennia adaptyvnosti pidpryiemstv do kryzovykh umov [Synergy of agile approach and low-code technologies as a factor in increasing the adaptability of enterprises to crisis conditions]. Development Service Industry Management, (2), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.31891/dsim-2025-10(17) (in Ukrainian)
22. Hryshchenko, I. M. (2025). Novyi kompleks nevyznachenosti ta VUCA-seredovyshche : vyklyky y mozhlyvosti dlia liderstva [The new uncertainty complex and VUCA environment: challenges and opportunities for leadership]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok – Public Administration: Improvement and Development, (3). http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156.2025.3.2 (in Ukrainian)
23. Chaliuk, Yu.O. (2022). Hlobalnyi sotsialno-ekonomichnyi rozvytok v umovakh VUCA, SPOD, DEST TA BANI svitu [Global socio-economic development in the conditions of VUCA, SPOD, DEST AND BANI world]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (36). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-36-21 (in Ukrainian)
24. Chykurkova, A. D., Fedirets, O. V., Pokotylska, N. V., & Tiutiunnyk, V. V. (2025). Zastosuvannia stsenarnoho planuvannia dlia pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti stratehichnoho upravlinnia v umovakh nevyznachenosti [Applying scenario planning to improve the effectiveness of strategic management under uncertainty]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Current Economic Problems, 5(287), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.32752/1993-6788-2025-1-287-390-402 (in Ukrainian)
25. Loi, A.V. (2023). Identyfikatsiia ryzykiv formuvannia ekonomichnoho potentsialu pidpryiemstva torhivli [Identification of risks in the formation of the economic potential of a trade enterprise]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky - Current economic problems, 7(265), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.32752/1993-6788-2023-1-265-47-56 (in Ukrainian)
26. Rachynska, H. V. (2026). Upravlinnia biznes-protsesamy MSP na osnovi data-driven pidkhodiv [Managing SME business processes based on data-driven approaches]. Aktualni pytannia ekonomichnykh nauk – Current Issues in Economic Sciences, (21). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19544987 (in Ukrainian)
27. Sytnyk, N.I., Perminova, S.A., & Chuprina, M.O. (2022). Dyzain-myslennia yak instrument orhanizatsiinoho navchannia [Design Thinking as an Organizational Learning Tool]. Ekonomichnyi prostir – Economic Space, (180), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/180-24 (in Ukrainian)
28. Irtyshcheva, I. O., Kramarenko, I. S., Bohatyrov, K. O., Hryshyna, N. V., Kupchyshyna, O. A., & Rakipov, V. R. (2023). Forsait tsyfrovoi transformatsii natsionalnoi ekonomiky ta yii vplyv na zabezpechennia innovatsiinoho rozvytku [Foresight of the digital transformation of the national economy and its impact on ensuring innovative development]. Aktualni problemy innovatsiinoi ekonomiky ta prava - Current problems of innovation economics and law, (5), 96–101. https://repo.btu.kharkov.ua//handle/123456789/48929 (in Ukrainian)
29. Bilousko, T., Lymar, O., Sereda, N., Kalinichenko, O., & Pylypiv, S. (2026). Change Management Strategies in Conditions of Global Economic Uncertainty. In: El Khoury, R. (Ed.), Business Models of the Future. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, (238). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-85398-2_54
30. Duha, S., Zerkal, A., Makarchuk, I., Tilikina, N., & Kachmar, B. (2025). Practical Implications of Human Capital Asset Allocation for the Business and Economy. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 18(11), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16738853 (in Ukrainian)
31. Kalinichenko, O., Makarchuk, I., & Yelisieiev, V. (2026). Developing a digital resilience strategy for businesses in a time of global instability. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, (14). https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2026.2.07
32. Brovinska, M. (2024). Grammarly, MacPaw, SoftServe, Preply ta 10 inshykh IT-kompanii pidpysaly kodeks povedinky shchodo vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu u svoikh produktakh. Shcho tse oznachaie? [Grammarly, MacPaw, SoftServe, Preply and 10 other IT companies have signed a code of conduct on the use of artificial intelligence in their products. What does this mean?] https://dev.ua/en/news/ikodeks-shi-1734437084 (in Ukrainian)
33. Kozhyna, A. V., Kocherov, M. V., & Bovsunivska, I. V. (2025). Pidvyshchennia dostupnosti administratyvnykh posluh cherez tsyfrovizatsiiu v umovakh voiennoho stanu v Ukraini [Increasing the accessibility of administrative services through digitalization under martial law in Ukraine]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok – Public Administration: Improvement and Development, (4). http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156.2025.4.5 (in Ukrainian)
34. Akhnovska, I. O., & Bondarenko, R. M. (2025). Ekonomichnyi vymir dydzhytalizatsii ahropromyslovoho kompleksu Ukrainy [The economic dimension of digitalization of Ukraine's agro-industrial complex]. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky - Sustainable economic development, 6(57), 775–782. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2025-57-107 (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Oleh Kalinichenko, Ivan Makarchuk