Abstract
This article is dedicated to analyzing the impact of Ukraine's civil society on the processes of public policy formation in Ukraine, which is highly relevant under the conditions of implementing democratic principles and good governance. The research methodology is based on the institutional approach, which allows for an analysis of the activities of both public authority institutions and civil society institutions in the decision-making process in the public sphere. It is determined that public policy in the modern world must closely interact with the community to ensure the most effective operation in the context of providing public services. The low level of social cooperation between government bodies and civil society, or its imitation, leads to a decrease in societal trust in governmental institutions at all levels. The growth of civic activity and the broad involvement of civil society agents in the processes of forming and implementing political decisions fosters the development of partnerships between the state and society, reduces the level of confrontation, and aids the successful implementation of democratic reforms, which is highly relevant for Ukraine. It has been determined that the practice of interaction between government institutions and the civil sector in decision-making in Ukraine is represented by constitutional mechanisms as well as other forms that require further legal support in the context of strengthening social partnership for the successful implementation of reforms at all levels. The example of decentralization reform has proven that more active citizen involvement in the public decision-making process increases trust in local self-government bodies, and the reform itself is perceived by citizens as one of the most successful, primarily due to the improvement in the quality of public services for the territorial communities' population. It has been determined that Ukrainian civil society has substantial potential, which should be actively utilized by state authorities to make optimal decisions in the sphere of public administration in the context of implementing reforms and amid post-war recovery of the country.
References
Anderson, J. E. (2003). Public policymaking: An introduction. Boston New York, 2003.
Heclo, H. (1972). Review Article: Policy Analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 83–108.
Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3). 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031
Teleshun, S. O. (Ed.) (2016). Publichna politika [Public policy]. NADU (in Ukrainian)
Tsokur, Ye. H. (2009). Osoblyvosti realizatsii idei hromadianskoho suspilstva ta yii vplyv na lehitymatsiini protsesy v suchasnii Ukraini [Peculiarities of the implementation of the idea of civil society and its influence on legitimation processes in modern Ukraine]. Scientific Journal of the National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 22. Political Science and Methods of Teaching Social and Political Disciplines, (1), 106–110. http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/3180 (in Ukrainian)
Ryabovol, L. T. (2020). Hromadianske suspilstvo yak naukova katehoriia ta predmet pravovykh doslidzhen [Civil society as a scientific category and subject of legal research] Naukovi zapysky: Seriia Pravo, (9), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.36550/2522-9230-2020-1-9-4-8 (in Ukrainian)
Skakun, O. F. (2009). Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava [General theory of state and law]. Pravo.
Kresina, I. (2005). Do pytannia pro vyznachennia poniattia hromadianskoho suspilstva i ukrainskoi revoliutsii 2004 roku [To the question of defining the concept of civil society and the Ukrainian revolution of 2004]. Politychnyi menedzhment, 6(15), 3–6. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/8906 (in Ukrainian)
Constitution of Ukraine No. 254к/96-ВР (1996). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text (in Ukrainian)
Almond, G. A., & Powell, G. B. Jr. (1966). Comparative politics: A developmental approach. Little, Brown and Co.
Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine On Approval of the Procedure for Facilitating Civil Examination of Executive Authorities No. 976 (2008). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/976-2008-%D0%BF#Text (in Ukrainian)
Chub, O. O. (2004). Konstytutsiine pravo hromadian Ukrainy na uchast v upravlinni derzhavnymy spravamy [The constitutional right of citizens of Ukraine to participate in the management of state affairs] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (in Ukrainian)
Teleshun, S.O., Pukhkal, O. H., Karlova, V. V., Reiterovych, I. V., & Sytnyk, S. V. (2019). Instrumenti ta mehanizmi viroblennya j vprovadzhennya publichnoyi politiki v Ukrayini [Tools and mechanisms of development and implementation of public policy in Ukraine]. Ukrinform. https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-other_news/2713805-instrumenti-ta-mehanizmi-viroblenna-j-vprovadzenna-publicnoipolitiki-v-ukraini.html (in Ukrainian)
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. (2012). Ukrainian trust in social institutions. https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=81 (in Ukrainian)
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. (2015). Trust in social institutions and social groups. https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=579 (in Ukrainian)
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. (2021). Dynamics of trust in social institutions during 2020–2021: the results of a telephone survey. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1093&page=1 (in Ukrainian)
USAID. (2024). CSO Sustainability Index Explorer. https://csosi.org/
McGann, J. G (2021). 2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. SCHOLARYCOMMONS. https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/48577
Chaltseva, O. (2020). Rol gromadianskogo suspilstva v proektuvanni publichnoii polityki v Ukrayini [The role of civil society in the design of public policy in Ukraine]. Bulletin of the Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University. Series Political sciences, (5), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.31558/2617-0248.2020.5.10 (in Ukrainian)
USAID. (2018). Indeks demokratichnosti mist 2018 r. [Democracy index of cities in 2018]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XjK6eC7NHBdVpPn2z2M-IH2o5l7OiJjy/view (in Ukrainian)
Stark, D. (2021). Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: Heterarchy in postsocialist firms. In P. DiMaggio (Ed.). The twenty-first-century firm: Changing economic organization in international perspective. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828302.69
Counsil of Europe. (2019). Decentralizaciia ta reforma mistsevoho samovriaduvannia: rezultaty sociolohichnoho doslidzhennia sered zhyteliv terytorialnyh hromad, iaki proishly protses obiednannia v 2015-2016 rokah [Decentralization and reform of local self-government: results of a sociological survey among residents of territorial communities that underwent the unification process in 2015-2016]. https://rm.coe.int/opinion-poll-2019-03-otg-ukr/1680aedc7a (in Ukrainian)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Olena Banchuk-Petrosova, Tetiana Madryha
