“I KNOW THAT I KNOW NOTHING”: THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL STANCE OF SOCRATES
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

philosophy
thinking
relativism
truth
irony
epistemology
skepticism
dogmatism
rationalism
maieutics
abstract thinking
critical thinking
anthropocentrism
morality
dialectics

How to Cite

Chornoshtan, Y. (2025). “I KNOW THAT I KNOW NOTHING”: THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL STANCE OF SOCRATES. Philosophy and Governance, (6(10). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2025.6.04

Abstract

The article explores and analyzes the meaning of the concept of “thinking”. Particular attention is paid to the philosophical system of Socrates, in particular his methodological and epistemological approaches to the study of human nature. The essence and specificity of the interpretation of thinking in the philosophy of the ancient Greek thinker are clarified. The emphasis is on the method of maieutics as a way of “birth” of truth through dialogical interaction. Philosophy is considered as a special form of knowledge focused on acquiring wisdom. The impact of modern innovative technologies on the process of human thinking is separately analyzed. The main aspects and types of thinking are highlighted, in particular abstract and critical. Socrates’ position on skepticism and dogmatism is determined. The main attention is focused on understanding the Socratic statement: “I know that I know nothing”, which is considered a key factor in the process of knowing science, the world and man himself. It is emphasized that in the process of perception and cognition of reality, an important role is played by the dialectical method of Socrates, aimed at the constant development of both science and human thinking. It is noted that the views on the concept of “thinking” of representatives of ancient Greek philosophy and the rationalist direction of the New Age are noted. The article also reveals modern problems caused by the perception of the world through the prism of relativistic ideas. Particular attention is focused on the fact that such views contribute to the growth of egoism and the intensification of social tension. Separately, debatable issues related to the relationship between subjective and objective truth are raised. The study also mentions criticism of Socratic philosophy.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2025.6.04
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Filosofiia [Philosophy]. (1970–1980). In Slovnyk ukrayinskoii movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language] (in 11 vols.). Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)

2. Aristotel. (2002). Pro dushu [On the Soul]. In Aristotel, Tvory [Works] (in 4 vols.) (Vol. 2, pp. 314–350). Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)

3. Descart, R. (2000). Roztumy pro pershu filosofiіu [Meditations on First Philosophy]. In R. Descartes, Tvory [Works] (p. 45). Kyiv: Yunivers. (in Ukrainian)

4. Platon. (2004). Teetet [Theaetetus] (V. Shovkun, Trans.). Kyiv: Yunivers. (in Ukrainian)

5. Ksenofont. (1883). Spohady pro Sokrata [Memoirs of Socrates] (in four books)] (I. Ye. Tymoshenko, Trans.). Kyiv: Drukarnia P. Yefymenka. (in Ukrainian)

6. Gadamer, H.-G. (1960). Istyna i metod [Truth and Method]. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). (in Ukrainian, original work “Wahrheit und Methode” published in German)

7. Doerr, O. (2022). Socrates’ “maieutics” and the ethical foundations of psychotherapy. European Psychiatry, 65(S1), S746. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1927

8. Westacott, E. (2025, May 2). Socratic Wisdom. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/socratic-wisdom-2670665

9. Callard, A. (2025). Open Socrates: The Case for a Philosophical Life. W. W. Norton & Company. https://wwnorton.com/books/open-socrates

10. Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://archive.org/details/socrates-ironist-moral-philosopher

11. Babii, I. V. (Ed.). (2002). Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Kyiv: VC “Akademiia”. (in Ukrainian)

12. Platon. (2004). Apolohiia Sokrata [Apology of Socrates] (S. I. Shraibman, Trans.). In Platon. Dialohy [Dialogues] (pp. 89–124). Kyiv: Osnovy. (in Ukrainian)

13. Zen’kovych, V. V. (Ed.). (2016). Slovnyk filosofskykh terminiv [Dictionary of Philosophical Terms]. Kyiv: Lybid. (in Ukrainian)

14. Nietzsche, F. (2001). Sutinky idoliv, abo yak filosofuiut molotom [Twilight of the Idols, or How One Philosophizes with a Hammer] (O. Lohvynenko, Trans.). Kyiv: Osnovy. (in Ukrainian)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Yevhenii Chornoshtan