Abstract
The article presents a comprehensive study of contemporary trends in the development of forensic activities under conditions of digitalization and identifies the specific features of applying digital technologies to meet the needs of authorized law enforcement units. It is established that the rapid advancement of information and communication technologies, the growing use of electronic evidence, the increasing volume of digital information, and the growing complexity of unlawful activities necessitate the transformation of traditional approaches to forensic support of law enforcement activities. The study analyzes scientific approaches to understanding the essence and significance of forensic activities within the system of law enforcement agencies. It is substantiated that, under contemporary conditions, forensic examination performs not only the function of evidence examination but is also becoming an increasingly important instrument of information and analytical support for the detection, disclosure, and investigation of criminal offenses. The regulatory and legal framework governing the use of digital technologies in forensic activities is examined, including legislation on forensic examination, criminal procedure law, regulations concerning electronic document management, electronic trust services, and cybersecurity. The article systematizes modern digital technologies used in the activities of forensic institutions and law enforcement agencies, including digital evidence analysis technologies, biometric identification systems, digital reconstruction tools, Big Data analytics, artificial intelligence technologies, and integrated information and analytical systems. Their functional capabilities and significance for enhancing the effectiveness of forensic support for law enforcement activities are determined. Particular attention is paid to the application of artificial intelligence technologies and automated analytical systems, which create new opportunities for processing large volumes of information and supporting decision-making in the course of forensic examinations. Based on a generalization of contemporary scientific approaches, the strategic directions for the development of forensic support for law enforcement activities under conditions of digitalization are identified. These directions are associated with the integration of information resources, the development of digital forensics, the improvement of mechanisms for handling digital evidence, the strengthening of cybersecurity measures, and the implementation of innovative digital solutions. It is demonstrated that the further development of forensic activities should be based on a combination of modern technological capabilities, effective legal regulation, and interagency information interaction, which will contribute to increasing the effectiveness of law enforcement activities in a digital society.
References
1. Chechil, Yu. O. (2025). Istoryko-pravovyi analiz formuvannia ekspertnykh sluzhb u systemi pravookhoronnykh orhaniv [Historical and legal analysis of the formation of expert services in the system of law enforcement agencies]. Naukovyi Visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriia: Pravo – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 92(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.92.4.71 (in Ukrainian)
2. Antoniuk, A. B. (2024). Orhanizatsiini formy sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti v konteksti zarubizhnoho dosvidu [Organizational forms of forensic activity in the context of foreign experience]. Yevropeiskyi Pravnychyi Chasopys – European Legal Journal, (3), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.36919/3041-1149(Print).3.2024.78-82 (in Ukrainian)
3. Naumenko, S. M. (2020). Systema pravookhoronnykh orhaniv, yaki vzaiemodiiut z ekspertnymy ustanovamy [The system of law enforcement agencies interacting with forensic institutions]. Teoriia ta Praktyka Sudovoi Ekspertyzy i Kryminalistyky – Theory and practice of forensic examination and criminology, (22), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2020.16 (in Ukrainian)
4. Hamaliuk, B. M., Liampel, V. I., & Tsymbalista, R. H. (2023). Instytutsiini zasady formuvannia systemy sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti v Ukraini [Institutional foundations of the formation of the forensic activity system in Ukraine]. Dniprovskyi Naukovyi Chasopys Publichnoho Upravlinnia, Psykholohii, Prava – Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law, (2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2023.2.9 (in Ukrainian)
5. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (1994). Pro sudovu ekspertyzu [On forensic examination] (Law of Ukraine No. 4038-XII). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text (in Ukrainian)
6. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2012). Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] (No. 4651-VI). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text (in Ukrainian)
7. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2003). Pro elektronni dokumenty ta elektronnyi dokumentoobih [On electronic documents and electronic document circulation] (Law of Ukraine No. 851-IV). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/851-15#Text (in Ukrainian)
8. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2017). Pro elektronni dovirchi posluhy [On electronic trust services] (Law of Ukraine No. 2155-VIII). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2155-19#Text (in Ukrainian)
9. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2017). Pro osnovni zasady zabezpechennia kiberbezpeky Ukrainy [On the basic principles of cybersecurity of Ukraine] (Law of Ukraine No. 2163-VIII). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2163-19 (in Ukrainian)
10. Tkachenko, N. (2025). Tendentsii rozvytku sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti v umovakh hlobalnoi tsyfrovoi transformatsii suspilstva [Trends in the development of forensic activity under conditions of global digital transformation of society]. Teoriia ta Praktyka Sudovoi Ekspertyzy i Kryminalistyky – Theory and practice of forensic science and criminology, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2025.03 (in Ukrainian)
11. Bansal, S., Nayak, S. S., & Dave, I. (2024). The role of forensic science and digital technology in enhancing investigation efficacy: An analytical study. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 53(3), 2332–2359. https://doi.org/10.48047/ecrbvn26
12. Klasén, L., Fock, N., & Forchheimer, R. (2024). The invisible evidence: Digital forensics as key to solving crimes in the digital age. Forensic Science International, (362), 112133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112133
13. Hargreaves, C., Breitinger, F., Dowthwaite, L., Webb, H., & Scanlon, M. (2024). DFPulse: The 2024 digital forensic practitioner survey. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, (51), 301844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301844
14. Breitinger, F., Hilgert, J.-N., Hargreaves, C., Sheppard, J., Overdorf, R., & Scanlon, M. (2024). DFRWS EU 10-year review and future directions in digital forensic research. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, (48), 301685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301685
15. Du, X., Hargreaves, C., Sheppard, J., Anda, F., Sayakkara, A., Le-Khac, N.-A., & Scanlon, M. (2020). SoK: Exploring the state of the art and the future potential of artificial intelligence in digital forensic investigation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3407023.3407068
16. Vasylenko, V. M. (2024). Tsyfrova transformatsiia pravookhoronnykh orhaniv: ryzyky v umovakh hibrydnykh zahroz ta shliakhy yikh podolannia [Digital transformation of law enforcement agencies: Risks in conditions of hybrid threats and ways to overcome them]. Visnyk Kryminolohichnoi Asotsiatsii Ukrainy – Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine, 2(32), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.32631/vca.2024.2.74 (in Ukrainian)
17. Karpets, Yu. V. (2025). Tsyfrovi dokazy ta kompiuterno-tekhnichni ekspertyzy u kryminalnykh provadzhenniakh pro viiskovi zlochyny [Digital evidence and computer forensic examinations in criminal proceedings on war crimes]. Yurydychnyi Naukovyi Elektronnyi Zhurnal – Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, (11), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2025-11/46 (in Ukrainian)
18. Pyadyshev, V. H., & Baltovskyi, O. A. (2025). Suchasni problemy tsyfrovoi kryminalistyky – zarubizhnyi pohliad [Modern problems of digital forensics: A foreign perspective]. Derzhava ta Rehiony. Seriia: Pravo – State and regions. Series: Law, 3(88), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-338X-2025.3.22 (in Ukrainian)
19. Hora, I. V., Kolesnyk, V. A., & Popovych, I. I. (2024). Tsyfrova kryminalistyka v zabezpechenni diialnosti z protydii zlochynnosti [Digital forensics in ensuring crime prevention activities]. Naukovyi Visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriia: Pravo – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod National University. Series: Law, 85(4), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.85.4.9 (in Ukrainian)
20. Singh, S. (2025). Forensic science in the 21st century: Innovations, challenges, and future perspectives. Journal of Forensic and Allied Sciences, 1(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16868643
21. Amerini, I., Barni, M., Battiato, S., Bestagini, P., Boato, G., Bruni, V., Caldelli, R., De Natale, F., De Nicola, R., Guarnera, L., et al. (2025). Deepfake media forensics: Status and future challenges. Journal of Imaging, 11(3), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11030073
22. Mohan, A., & Alenezi, R. (2023). Digital forensics in the age of smart environments: A survey of recent advancements and challenges. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09682
23. Martynenko, N. (2025). Digitalisation of forensic expert activity in Ukraine: Organisational and legal framework. Forensic Science International: Synergy, (10), 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100578
24. Simakova-Yefremian, E. (2024). Sudova ekspertyza v tsyfrovu epokhu: vyklyky ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Forensic examination in the digital era: Challenges and development prospects]. Teoriia ta Praktyka Sudovoi Ekspertyzy i Kryminalistyky – Theory and practice of forensics and criminalistics, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2024.01 (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Igor Boginich, Oleksandr Korniichuk, Tetiana Pluhatar