INTEGRATION OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS AND CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES IN THE ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC INTERACTION
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

intercultural communication
trust
transaction costs
institutional economics
cultural distance
international economics
economic efficiency
international business

How to Cite

Aksyonova, O. (2026). INTEGRATION OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS AND CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES IN THE ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC INTERACTION. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, (17). https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2026.5.181

Abstract

Against the backdrop of deepening globalization, the digitalization of international business and the increasing intensity of cross-border economic interaction, research into intercultural communication as a factor in building trust and reducing transaction costs is becoming particularly relevant. Cultural differences between economic agents influence the quality of communication, the level of uncertainty, the effectiveness of negotiation processes, and the outcomes of international cooperation. At the same time, in modern economic science, the mechanisms for integrating intercultural factors into models of transaction costs and the quantitative assessment of their impact on the economic efficiency of international operations remain insufficiently researched. This study aims to summarize theoretical and methodological approaches to the analysis of intercultural communication in the international economy, to identify its role in building trust and reducing transaction costs, and to develop a conceptual framework for empirical research into these interrelationships. Based on a systematic analysis of academic sources, it has been established that intercultural communication acts as an important institutional mechanism for coordinating economic activity, which helps to reduce information asymmetry, limit opportunistic behavior, and increase the predictability of interaction between international partners. It has been demonstrated that the conceptual foundation of the study is formed by the provisions of R. Coase’s theory of the firm, O. Williamson’s theory of transaction costs, D. North’s institutional theory, and G. Hofstede’s cross-cultural model. It is argued that trust functions as a hybrid institution that combines formal and informal mechanisms for regulating economic relations and acts as a mediator of the influence of intercultural communication on transaction costs. A system of scientific hypotheses regarding the interrelationship between the level of intercultural communication, trust, cultural distance and transaction costs is proposed. An approach to the operationalization of the key variables of the study has been developed, and a basic econometric model is proposed for the empirical testing of the formulated hypotheses. The findings of the study confirm the validity of treating intercultural communication as an independent institutional factor in the international economy, one that influences the development of trust and the level of transaction costs at the micro-, meso- and macroeconomic levels. It has been established that effective intercultural communication helps to reduce cultural distance, improve the quality of economic interaction and build long-term competitive advantages. The proposed theoretical propositions and methodological tools can be used for further empirical research into international economic relations, assessing the impact of intercultural factors on economic efficiency, and developing practical mechanisms for improving international cooperation.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2026.5.181
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Ahmad, I. (2025). The strategic role of artificial intelligence in overcoming intercultural barriers for SME internationalization: A systematic literature review. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 25(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v25i2.1065

2. Cannon, J. P., & Perreault, W. D. (1999). Buyer–seller relationships in business markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.36.4.439.25107

3. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

4. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, (3), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560

5. De Mattos, C., Salciuviene, L., & Sanderson, S. (2025). Can conflict be a desirable step in trust-building within international strategic alliances? A systematic literature review and typology. International Strategic Alliances Literature, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101234

6. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.

7. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.23

8. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.

9. Hammami, H. (2025). Intercultural negotiation strategies: Enhancing e-business performance through cultural intelligence and trust building. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 29(S2), 1–10. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/intercultural-negotiation-strategies-enhancing-ebusiness-performance-through-cultural-intelligence-and-trust-building.pdf

10. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

11. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

12. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

13. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288

14. Jiao, J., Jin, J., Feng, X., & Zhao, X. (2025). Towards an Enterprises’ Cross-Cultural Competence Scale. Sage Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251363312

15. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

16. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97

17. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

18. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. McGraw-Hill.

19. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Free Press.

20. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.

21. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595

22. Xia, S. (2025). Cultivating harmony across borders: Chinese cultural communication and corporate discourse in cross-cultural contexts. Frontiers in Communication, (10). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.165073

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Oksana Aksyonova