Abstract
The article deals with topical issues of evidence in criminal proceedings related to cybercrime. The authors focus on the peculiarities of digital evidence, its authenticity, recording, storage and use in court proceedings. The objective of this article is to formulate evidence-based recommendations for enhancing the proof process in criminal proceedings involving cybercrime. This entails examining current methods for handling digital evidence, exploring international practices, and proposing strategies for their integration into domestic criminal justice systems. The lack of clear procedures for collecting digital evidence, insufficient technical equipment of investigators, and the lack of sufficient practice of cooperation between public and private entities in the field of cybersecurity. observance of the rights of participants in the process. Analysis of international experience, in particular the provisions of the Budapest Convention and GDPR, which can be integrated into the national legislation of Ukraine, and the search for adequate ways to resolve existing contradictions in the field of cybercrime investigation. The use of modern technologies, such as blockchain, artificial intelligence and cloud services, to improve the efficiency of digital evidence management. The authors outline the prospects for improving the legal and regulatory framework and training of specialists to combat cybercrime. It is considered promising to create a specialised body which would be a single centre for processing digital evidence in order to ensure standardisation of procedures, increase the efficiency of investigations and promote harmonisation of national legislation with international standards. The study found that digital evidence, as a key element in criminal proceedings related to cybercrime, requires special approaches to its collection, storage and analysis.
References
1. Bandurka, O. M., Perepelytsia, M. M., Manzhai, O. V., et al. (2013). Operatyvno-rozshukova komparatyvistyka: Monohrafiia [Operational-search comparativistics: Monograph]. Kharkiv: Zolota mylia. (in Ukrainian)
2. Cyberpolice of Ukraine. (2018). Pidsumky 2018 roku v tsyfrakh [Results of 2018 in figures]. https://cyberpolice.gov.ua/results/2018 (in Ukrainian)
3. Diia. Osvita. (n.d.). Osnovy kiberhihieny [Cyber hygiene fundamentals]. https://osvita.diia.gov.ua/courses/cyber-hygiene (in Ukrainian)
4. Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. (2012). Pravyla nadannia ta otrymannia telekomunikatsiinykh posluh, zatverdzheni postanovoiu № 295 vid 11 kvitnia 2012 r.: iz zminamy na 08.04.2013 [Rules for the provision and receipt of telecommunications services, approved by Resolution No. 295 of April 11, 2012, as amended on 08.04.2013]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/295-2012-%D0%BF#Text (in Ukrainian)
5. Luhina, N. A., & Kybysh, I. V. (2022). Zapobihannia kryminalnym pravoporushenniam, pov’iazanym iz vykorystanniam kryptovaliuty [Prevention of criminal offenses related to the use of cryptocurrency]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo – Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, (4), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.04.52 (in Ukrainian)
6. Nykyforchuk, D. Y. (2010). Do pytannia vykorystannia rezultativ operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi [On the use of operational-search activity results in criminal proceedings]. Borotba z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu i koruptsiieiu (teoriia i praktyka), (22), 61–66. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/boz_2010_22_7 (in Ukrainian)
7. Sambor, M. A. (2013). Nehlasni slidchi (rozshukovi) dii, poviazani iz zniattiam informatsii z transportnykh telekomunikatsiinykh merezh ta vstanovlenniam mistseznakhodzhennia radioelektronnoho zasobu [Covert investigative (search) actions related to the interception of data from telecommunications networks and tracking the location of a radio-electronic device]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu imeni Alfreda Nobelia. Seriia: Yurydychni nauky, (1), 74–81. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vdujn_2013_1_13 (in Ukrainian)
8. Samoilenko, O. A. (2020). Osnovy metodyky rozsliduvannia zlochyniv, vchynenykh u kiberprostrori [Fundamentals of methodology for investigating crimes committed in cyberspace] (A. F. Volobuiev, Ed.). Odesa: TES. https://doi.org/10.32837/11300.13264 (in Ukrainian)
9. Savchuk, N. V. (2009). Kiberzlochynnist: zmist ta metody borotby [Cybercrime: content and methods of combating]. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannia ekonomiky, (19), 338–342. http://tppe.econom.univ.kiev.ua/data/2009_19/zb19_48.pdf (in Ukrainian)
10. Tahiiev, S. R. (2013). Tymchasovyi dostup do informatsii, yaka znakhodytsia v operatoriv ta provideriv telekomunikatsii, u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Temporary access to information held by telecommunications operators and providers in criminal proceedings]. Chasopys tsyvilnoho i kryminalnoho sudochynstva, (4), 98–110. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Chcks_2013_4_9 (in Ukrainian)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nataliia Luhina, Oleksandr Paliukh
