Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive theoretical justification and offers practical recommendations for developing a system of democratic civilian control over the administrative responsibility of military personnel in Ukraine. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to transform the security and defense sector in accordance with NATO standards and the requirements of the martial law legal regime. The author states that the current system of administrative responsibility is characterized by “legal dualism”, caused by contradictions between the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses and the Disciplinary Statute, which creates a basis for excessive command discretion and violation of the rights of military personnel as “citizens in uniform”. The work proposes and details six strategic control mechanisms. First, the institutionalization of the Military Ombudsman based on the German model as a body of parliamentary oversight is substantiated. Second, the strengthening of judicial supervision through the specialization of civilian judges is proposed, which will ensure professional consideration of cases while maintaining independence from the military hierarchy. The third mechanism is identified as the transformation of the Military Law Enforcement Service into a full-fledged Military Police with procedural independence, which will allow for the separation of investigative and decision-making functions. The fourth aspect highlights the digitalization of records through the Unified Electronic Register, ensuring the transparency of statistics for civil society. The fifth element is identified as the development of military advocacy and free legal aid based on the Canadian model. The final mechanism is the codification of legislation through the adoption of the Code of Military Justice of Ukraine. It is proven that the implementation of these mechanisms will ensure the transition from a punitive to a service-oriented model, where the strengthening of discipline is based on the principles of justice and the rule of law. The study’s conclusions can be used in reforming the regulatory and legal framework of Ukraine and implementing Euro-Atlantic standards into the daily activities of the Armed Forces.
References
1. Averochkina, T. V., & Bilous-Osin, T. I. (2023). Spivvidnoshennia dystsyplinarnoi ta administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti [Correlation between disciplinary and administrative responsibility]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, (1), 655–657. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-1/155 (in Ukrainian)
2. Belaniuk, M. V. (2024). Osoblyvosti evoliutsii viiskovoi yustytsii u krainakh-chlenakh NATO [Features of the evolution of military justice in NATO member countries]. Informatsiia i pravo, 1(48), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2024.1(48).300831 (in Ukrainian)
3. Kolomoets, T. O. (2005). Administratyvnyi prymus u publichnomu pravi Ukrainy: teoriia, dosvid ta praktyka realizatsii [Administrative coercion in public law of Ukraine: Theory, experience and practice of implementation] (Extended abstract of Doctoral dissertation). Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/bitstreams/2c42cb32-e6f6-47e1-aade-b722a4a8f7a4/download (in Ukrainian)
4. Komissarov, M. L., & Komissarova, N. O. (2025). Osoblyvosti kryminalnoi vidpovidalnosti viiskovosluzhbovtsiv krain-chleniv NATO [Features of criminal liability of military personnel of NATO member countries]. Naukovyi visnyk Kyivskoho instytutu NHU, (1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.59226/2786-6920.1.2025.117-124 (in Ukrainian)
5. Lee, S. (2025). Administrative actions in military law. Number Analytics. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/administrative-actions-military-law
6. Martseliak, O. V. (2024). Viiskovyi ombudsmen yak instytutsiina harantiia zakhystu prav viiskovosluzhbovtsiv (zarubizhnyi dosvid) [Military ombudsman as an institutional guarantee of protection of the rights of military personnel (foreign experience)]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoiznavstvo, (5), 94–100. https://app-journal.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/APP_5_2024-1.pdf (in Ukrainian)
7. Pashynskyi, V., & Stupak, D. (2020a). Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia oborony Ukrainy: monohrafiia [Administrative and legal support of the defense of Ukraine: A monograph]. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2217.2023.53.37-40 (in Ukrainian)
8. Pashynskyi, V. Yi. (2020b). Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia oborony Ukrainy: teoriia i praktyka [Administrative and legal support of the defense of Ukraine: Theory and practice] (Doctoral dissertation). Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. https://scc.knu.ua/upload/iblock/ee5/dis_Pashynskyi_V.Yo..pdf (in Ukrainian)
9. Polyansky Y. (2019). Viiskova yustytsiia v Ukraini: problemi pytannia [Military justice in Ukraine: Problematic issues]. Yurydychnyi visnyk, (3), 5–11. https://yurvisnyk.in.ua/v3_2019/2019_3.pdf (in Ukrainian)
10. Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian SSR. (1984, December 7). Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia: Zakon URSR № 8073-X [Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses: Law of the Ukrainian SSR No. 8073-X]. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10 (in Ukrainian)
11. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1999, March 24). Pro Dystsyplinarnyi statut Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy № 551-XIV [On the Disciplinary Statute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine No. 551-XIV]. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/551-14 (in Ukrainian)
12. Vitvitskyi, S. S., Veselov, M. Yu., Nesterenko, O. M., & Yepryntsev, P. S. (2024). Viiskovi administratyvni pravoporushennia: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar [Military administrative offenses: A scientific and practical commentary]. Pravo. https://rep.dnuvs.ukr.education/handle/123456789/3677 (in Ukrainian)
13. Zaluzhnyi, V. F., Shaptala, S. O., Krymets, L. V., & Pashynskyi, V. Yi. (2023). Kontseptualni zasady formuvannia perspektyvnoi systemy dystsyplinarnoi vidpovidalnosti viiskovosluzhbovtsiv ZSU v контексті yevroatlantychnoi intehratsii [Conceptual foundations of forming a promising system of disciplinary responsibility of military personnel of the AFU in the context of Euro-Atlantic integration]. Nauka i oborona, (1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.33099/2618-1614-2023-21-1-3-9 (In Ukrainian)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nataliia Klymenko
