Abstract
Russia has increasingly focused on developing comprehensive digital policies aimed at establishing “digital sovereignty” which seeks to reduce dependence on foreign technologies, internet infrastructure, and multinational platforms. These policies integrate internet governance, media regulation, cybersecurity, and content monitoring under the overarching concept of “information security”. The state’s digital strategy is historically rooted in Cold War-era concerns, including military-industrial competition, national identity preservation, and control over information flows. In recent years, Russia’s digital policies have intensified in response to domestic economic stagnation, political crises, and social movements that challenge the legitimacy of the regime. This study employs a mixed-methods approach combining the analysis of legal documents, policy papers, official statements, international indices, and datasets on internet censorship, online prosecutions, and digital surveillance. It examines how Russia’s digital sovereignty policies – including the Sovereign Internet Law, Yarovaya amendments, VPN restrictions, and mandatory data localization – impact freedom of speech, privacy, and access to information. The research demonstrates that while these measures are framed as necessary for national security, they enable broad censorship, state surveillance, and the suppression of civil liberties. Furthermore, Russia’s model reflects a form of “digital authoritarianism” which relies on both legal frameworks and technical measures to control the internet, regulate content, and influence public opinion. The findings underscore that Russia’s prioritization of regime stability over citizens’ rights has significant implications for freedom of expression, human rights, and global internet governance, highlighting a growing tension between national security imperatives and digital freedoms.
References
1. Alexander, M. (2004). The Internet and democratization: The development of Russian Internet policy. Population, 8(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.12.4.607-627
2. Allerson, E. (2022). Internet censorship in Russia: The sovereign internet laws and Russia’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 31(1), 233–258. https://minnjil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Allerson_v31_i1_233_258.pdf
3. Amnesty International. (n.d.). Russia 2023 report. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/europe-and-central-asia/eastern-europe-and-central-asia/russia/report-russia/
4. Bezrukov, A. O., Mamonov, M. V., Suchkov, M. A., & Sushentsov, A. A. (2021). Russia in the digital world: International competition and leadership. Russia in Global Affairs, (2), 64–85. http://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2021-19-2-64-85
5. Committee to Protect Journalists. (2015, February 19). In Russia, media regulator uses warnings to restrict the press. https://cpj.org/2015/02/in-russia-media-regulator-uses-warnings-to-restric/
6. Duffy, N. (2022). Internet freedom in Vladimir Putin’s Russia: The noose tightens. American Enterprise Institute. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/internet-freedom-vladimir-putins-russia-noose-tightens/
7. Epifanova, A., & Dietrich, P. (2022). Russia’s quest for digital sovereignty. DGAP Analysis, 1. German Council on Foreign Relations. https://doi.org/10.60823/DGAP-22-36557-en
8. Freedom House. (2023). Russia: Freedom on the Net 2023 country report. https://freedomhouse.org/country/russia/freedom-net/2023#footnote1_1ax0qsg
9. Human Rights Watch. (2017, July 18). Online and on all fronts: Russia’s assault on freedom of expression. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/07/18/online-and-all-fronts/russias-assault-freedom-expression
10. Kerr, J. (2019). The Russian Model of Digital Control and Its Significance. In N. D. Wright (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence, China, Russia, and the Global Order (pp. 62–74). Air University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep19585.14
11. Kratasjuk, E. (2006). Construction of ‘reality’ in Russian mass media news on television and on the internet. In H. Schmidt, K. Teubener, & J. Konradova (Eds.), Control + Shift: Public and private usages of the Russian Internet (pp. 34–50). Norderstedt: BOD-Verlag. https://search.gesis.org/publication/gesis-solis-00377169
12. MacKinnon, R. (2012). Consent of the networked: The world-wide struggle for Internet freedom. New York, NY: Basic Books. https://scalar.usc.edu/works/uiuc-macs410-media-information-ethics-/media/PDF_ConsentofNetworked_PrefIntroC1C2C3.pdf
13. Maréchal, N. (2017). Networked authoritarianism and the geopolitics of information: Understanding Russian Internet policy. Media and Communication, 5(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.808
14. Meserole, A. (2019). Exporting digital authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese models. Brookings Institution. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3527460/exporting-digital-authoritarianism/4328250/
15. Nisbet, E. C. (2015, February). Benchmarking public demand: Russia’s appetite for Internet control. Center for Global Communication Studies / Russian Public Opinion Research Center. https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/37496
16. Nocetti, J. (2015). Russia’s “dictatorship-of-the-law” approach to internet policy. Internet Policy Review, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2015.4.380
17. Ognyanova, K. (2015). In Putin's Russia, Information Has You: Media Control and Internet Censorship in the Russian Federation. In M. Merviö (Ed.), Management and Participation in the Public Sphere (pp. 62–79). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8553-6.ch003
18. Orlova, A. V. (2020). “Digital sovereignty” anonymity, and freedom of expression: Russia’s fight to re-shape internet governance. UC Davis Journal of International Law & Policy, 26(2), 225–248. https://jilp.law.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk15346/files/2024-05/26UCDavisJIntlLPoly225.pdf
19. Petrova, M., Fossato, F., Indina, T., Dokuka, S., & Asmolov, G. (2013). Ranking digital rights report: Russia (Unpublished report). Moscow: Center for the Study of New Media and Society.
20. Pollicino, O., & Soldatov, O. (2018). Striking the balance between human rights online and state security concerns: The Russian way in a comparative context. German Law Journal, 19(1), 85–112. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3203724
21. U.S. Department of State. (2024). 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Russia (Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor). https://www.ecoi.net/de/dokument/2108736.html
22. Xue, D., Mixon-Baca, B., Valdik S.S., Ablove, A., Kujath, B., Crandall, J. R., & Ensafi, R. (2022). TSPU: Russia’s decentralized censorship system. In IMC '22: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 179–194). https://doi.org/10.1145/3517745.3561461
23. Xue, D., Ramesh, R., Valdik S.S., Evdokimov, L., Viktorov, A., Jain, A., Wustrow, E., Basso, S., & Ensafi, R. (2021). Throttling Twitter: An emerging censorship technique in Russia. In IMC '21: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 435–443). https://doi.org/10.1145/3487552.3487858

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sude Güvenç
