ECONOMIC INTEGRATION AND COOPERATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBALIZATION
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

European integration
globalization
administrative pressure
multilateralism
bilateralism

How to Cite

Fedyk, M. (2025). ECONOMIC INTEGRATION AND COOPERATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBALIZATION. Public Management and Policy, (1(5), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.1.03

Abstract

Modern integration processes are taking place in the context of a profound transformation of the global economy, where globalization and regionalization complement each other. Since the potential for reducing tariff barriers has been exhausted, it is important to eliminate non-tariff restrictions and harmonize domestic economic policies. An important aspect is the change in the formats of international economic interaction, which is caused by difficulties in implementing free trade rules and increased protectionist measures. The purpose of the study is to analyze economic integration and cooperation in the context of globalization, in particular, to study the key challenges and prospects for the development of integration processes. It is proved that modern international economic integration is characterized by the growing role of non-tariff measures, the expansion of trade blocs and the emergence of new mixed formats of cooperation. The impact of regionalization contributes to the growth of international trade and economic convergence, as the reduction of non-tariff barriers and the formation of open trade blocs contribute to economic growth and reduce the likelihood of armed conflict. At the same time, international integration faces threats, including disintegration trends in the world’s major economies, which could lead to large-scale trade conflicts and weaken the functions of multilateral regulatory mechanisms. The importance of the WTO in ensuring trade and economic liberalization and resolving disputes between countries remains key to the stability of international trade, despite the existing challenges. An important aspect is Ukraine’s prospects in the context of integration into the European market, where it is necessary to reform the judicial system, fight corruption, reduce administrative pressure on business, improve the VAT refund mechanism and create incentives for self-employment in order to successfully adapt to European standards. Modern integration processes are characterized by the emergence of new mixed formats of economic interaction that complement traditional models of regional and global integration. However, integration faces challenges, including the fragmentation of the global economic space, growing protectionism, and uneven economic development. European integration offers significant opportunities for Ukraine, but its effectiveness depends on domestic reforms and adaptation to international standards. Further development of integration processes will require a balance between market openness and protection of national economic interests.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.1.03
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2016). The Design of Trade Agreements. Handbook of Commercial Policy, 1A, 435–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.005

2. Baldwin, R. (2012). WTO 2.0: Global governance of supply-chain trade. CEPR Policy Insight 64. December.

3. Baldwin, R. (2016). The World Trade Organization and the Future of Multilateralism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.95

4. Baldwin, R. E. (2011). Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocks on the Path to Global Free Trade. International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, I, 31–89. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805995.00012

5. Bekkers, E., & Teh, R. (2019). Potential economic effects of a global trade conflict: Projecting the medium-run effects with the WTO global trade model. WTO Staff Working Paper, No. ERSD-2019-04, World Trade Organization, Geneva.

6. Bhagwati, J. (1993). Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview. In New Dimensions in Regional Integration / Ed. by J. De Melo and A. Panagariya. (pp. 22–51). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628511.004

7. Bhagwati, J. (2008). Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade. New York: Oxford University Press. 139 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331653.001.0001

8. Caliendo, L., Feenstra, R. C., Romalis, J., & Taylor, A. M. (2015). Tariff Reductions, Entry, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for the Last Two Decades. NBER Working Paper 21768. December. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21768

9. Cipollina, M., & Salvatici, L. (2010). Reciprocal Trade Agreements in Gravity Models: A Meta-Analysis. Review of International Economics, 18(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2009.00877.x

10. Ethier, W. J. (2011). Contemporary Regionalism. International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, I, 124. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805995.00014

11. Freund, C., & Ornelas, E. (2010). Regional Trade Agreements. Annual Review of Economics, 2, 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124455

12. Grossman, G. M. (2016). The Purpose of Trade Agreements. Handbook of Commercial Policy, 1A, 380. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22070

13. Grossman, G. M., McCalman, P., & Staiger, R. W. (2019). The «New» Economics of Trade Agreements: From Trade Liberalization to Regulatory Convergence? NBER Working Paper 26132, August. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26132

14. Horn, H., Mavroidis, P. C., & Sapir, A. (2010). Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements. World Economy, 33(11), 1565–1588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01273.x

15. Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K. M. (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 54(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3

16. Kreinin, M. E., & Plummer, M. G. (2008). Effects of Regional Integration on FDI: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 19(5-6), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2008.09.005

17. Krugman, P. (1991). The move toward free trade zones. Economic Review, November/ December, 5–25.

18. Limao, N. (2016). Preferential Trade Agreements. Handbook of Commercial Policy, 1B, 279–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.013

19. Lipsey, R. G., & Smith, M. G. (2011). Multilateral versus Regional Trading Arrangements: Substitutes or Complements? International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, I, 98. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805995.00013

20. Maggi, G. (2014). International Trade Agreements. Handbook of International Economics, 4, 352. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00006-9

21. Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Thoenig, M. (2012). The Geography of Conflicts and Regional Trade Agreements. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 4(4), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.4.4.1

22. Plummer, M. G. (2007). Best practices in regional trading arrangements: an application to Asia. The World Economy, 30(12), 1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01061.x

23. Wei, S., & Frankel, J. A. (1997). Open versus Closed Trade Blocs. In Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements. (pp. 119–140). University of Chicago Press.

24. Whalley, J. (1996). Why Do Countries Seek Regional Trade Agreements? NBER Working Paper 5552. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5552

25. Ladonko, L., Mozhaikina, N., Buryk, Z., Ostrovskyi, I., & Saienko, V. (2022). Regional aspects of the economy modernization: the qualitative evidence from EU countries. International Journal for Quality Research, 16(3), 851–862. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR16.03-13

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Mariana Fedyk