Abstract
In today’s environment of global instability, tightening environmental standards, and increasing corporate social responsibility, traditional supply chain management models focused solely on cost minimization are losing their effectiveness. Operational risks associated with logistical disruptions, reputational losses, and regulatory sanctions require management to transition to the concept of Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM). Integrating ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) principles into logistical processes is becoming not only an ethical issue but also a strategic tool for ensuring the operational resilience of an enterprise in the context of post-crisis economic recovery. The Purpose of the Article is the theoretical justification and development of practical recommendations for using sustainable supply chain management tools as an effective mechanism for minimizing operational risks in a dynamic market environment. The study employs general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis to refine the conceptual apparatus of SSCM, the categorization method for classifying operational risks, and a logical-analytical approach to identify the relationship between socio-environmental responsibility and the economic security of business entities. It is proven that the integration of sustainable approaches into the administrative management system allows for the transformation of the supply chain from a linear structure into a flexible ecosystem. It is established that administrative control within SSCM should be based on the principles of transparency and continuous auditing of the product life cycle. It is determined that the primary levers for minimizing operational risks include the implementation of “green” supplier audits, digitalization of resource flow monitoring, and compliance with social labor standards. It is substantiated that social management within SSCM contributes to reducing reputational risks and strengthening stakeholder loyalty by establishing ethical standards for interaction with contractors. The author proposes an integrated model for evaluating the effectiveness of sustainable supply chains, which considers not only economic indicators but also the level of environmental impact and social inclusivity, allowing for the early identification of potential threats to operational activities. Scientific Novelty lies in the improvement of organizational and managerial tools for risk minimization by combining administrative control methods with the principles of social responsibility within a unified sustainable development strategy. The definition of the term “operational resilience of the supply chain” has been further developed as the system’s ability to mitigate external shocks through compliance with environmental and social imperatives. The formulated conclusions and recommendations can be utilized by enterprise managers to improve operational activities, increase investment attractiveness, and adapt business models to the requirements of European legislation in the field of sustainable development.
References
1. Verma, A. (2025). Green thinking: impact of smart technologies on supply chain management. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16(9), 1527–1559. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2024-0020
2. Sharma, M., Antony, R., Sharma, A., & Daim, T. (2025). Can smart supply chain bring agility and resilience for enhanced sustainable business performance?. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 36(2), 501–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-09-2023-0381
3. Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200414211
4. Tundys, B., & Wiśniewski, T. (2023). Triple bottom line aspects and sustainable supply chain resilience: A structural equation modelling approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, (11), 1161437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1161437
5. Hrashchenko, I., & Khmurova, V. (2026). Performance management of sustainable logistics processes: Environmental and economic KPIs in EU practice. European Scientific Journal of Economic and Financial Innovation, 1(19), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.32750/2026-0114 (in Ukrainian)
6. Vinnytskyi, A. (2025). Improving the evaluation of the effectiveness of process integration of enterprises in supply chains. Economy and Society, (75). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-75-52 (in Ukrainian)
7. Kraievskyi, V., & Shevchenko, Ye. (2025). Systemic reconfiguration of the structure of logistics costs in the context of implementing the principles of ecological and climate-responsible logistics. Ukrainian Economic Journal, (9), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2025-9-9 (in Ukrainian)
8. Kuzhel, V. (2025). Logistics management of enterprises based on sustainable development. Collection of Scientific Papers “Scientific Notes”, 40(3), 83–99. http://doi.org/10.33111/vz_kneu.40.25.03.08.053.059
9. Khachaturyan, O. (2023). Supply chain management – evaluation of models and methods. Central Ukrainian Scientific Bulletin. Technical Sciences, 2(8(39), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.32515/2664-262x.2023.8(39).2.198-206 (in Ukrainian)
10. Tereshchenko, S. I., & Evtushenko, A. M. (2024). Supply chain logistics: Management and optimization. Journal of Strategic Economic Research, (6), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.30857/2786-5398.2023.6.21 (in Ukrainian)
11. Kuibida, V. S., & Buryk, Z. M. (2019). Sustainable Development of Ukraine: Goals and Mechanisms of Implementation. Kyiv: National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
12. Golicic, S. L., & Smith, C. D. (2013). A meta‐analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12006
13. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2025). Building sustainable supply chains for developing economies: Pathways to 2050. UNIDO. https://lnk.ua/0BH1z0shu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Zoriana Buryk, Olha Tadeoshchuk
