Keywords
digital age
social media
political communication
computational propaganda
How to Cite
Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that the implementation of political influence in the digital age extends beyond the classical models of propaganda. A shift is observed towards multi-level, interactive, algorithmically mediated interaction, where digital platforms, artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and digital citizen behavior play a key role. The research aims to explore the digital transformation of political influence through the lens of contemporary propaganda dynamics. The paper shows a shift from classical models of ideological mobilization through centralized media to decentralized, algorithmically mediated forms of interaction defined by digital platforms, artificial intelligence, and big data analytics. The hybrid nature of modern propaganda is emphasized, as it combines traditional communication methods with new technologies, including micro-targeting, the use of bots, deepfakes, and algorithmic content filtering. Special attention is paid to the epistemological shift in the paradigm of political communication: from centralized and verbal to fragmented, multimodal, and emotionally manipulative. The article outlines the threats of algorithmic authoritarianism, information overload, and cognitive manipulation, which undermine democratic resilience and blur the boundaries between truth, propaganda, and disinformation. At the same time, the necessity of developing digital sovereignty and media literacy as key mechanisms to counter disinformation and protect democratic values in the digital age is emphasized. It is established that the transformation of communication forms caused by digitalization expands the ontological boundaries of political power, and political propaganda becomes the infrastructural core of the power mechanism. One of the most alarming consequences of the digital transformation of political influence is the increased vulnerability of democracy to manipulation and information attacks. Digital propaganda becomes not just a tool of influence but also a means of undermining the foundations of the democratic order. It not only changes the tools of politics but also changes its very anthropology, eroding fundamental concepts of leadership, participation, trust, and identity.
References
1. Ariel, Y., & Elishar V. (2025). Political Communication and the Hype Cycle: Tracing Its Evolution Across the Digital Era. Journal. Media, 6(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020087
2. Bejko, L. (2024). Power of Pixels: Examining the Influence of Digital Tactics on Modern Elections and Political Campaigning. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR), 3(3), 1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v3i3.7624
3. Buchmeier, Y. (2024). Media Politics in Japan: News Journalism Between Interdependence, Integrity, and Influence. Medienpolitik International, (69), 495–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-024-00858-3
4. Castells, M. (2013). Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. 2th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Dharta, F. Y., Ghazalie, Putra, D. A., & Albrecht, M. (2025). Transformation of political campaigning in the digital era: The impact of social media and digital communication. Jurnal Praksis dan Dedikasi (JPDS), 8(1), 31–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um022v8i12025p31-41
7. Dobber, T., & Helberger, N. (2017). Is political micro-targeting hijacking European democracy? Internet Policy Review. https://policyreview.info/articles/news/political-micro-targeting-hijacking-european-democracy/753
8. Herrero, J., Erdem, H., Torrres, A., & Urueña, A. (2025). Democracy Dysfunctions and Citizens’ Digital Agency in Highly Contaminated Digital Information Ecosystems. Societies, 15(7), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15070175
9. Klincewicz, M., Alfano, M., Fard, & A. (2025). Slopaganda: The Interaction Between Propaganda and Generative AI. Filosofiska Notiser, 12(1), 135–162. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.01560
10. Meyer, T. (2002). Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics. Cambridge : Polity.
11. Olaniran, B., & Williams, I. (2020). Social Media Effects: Hijacking Democracy and Civility in Civic Engagement. J. Jones & M. Trice. (Eds.), Platforms, Protests, and the Challenge of Networked Democracy. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. (pp. 77–94). Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7_5
12. Polanunu, H. S. A. B. (2025). Digital Warfare and Computational Propaganda in the Israeli-Hamas War: An Analysis of the Influence of Perception Warfare on Conflict Dynamics. Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies, 5(4), 4400–4414. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i4.49962
13. Riedl, M. J., Lukito, J., & Woolley, S. C. (2023). Political Influencers on Social Media: An Introduction. Social Media + Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177938
14. Rushchenko, I. (2021). Propahanda ta kontrpropahanda v tsyfrovomu suspilstvi: instytutsionalizatsiia 2.0? [Propaganda and Counter-Propaganda in the Digital Society: Institutionalization 2.0?]. Ukrainskyi sotsiolohichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Sociological Journal, (25), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.26565/2077-5105-2021-25-01 (in Ukrainian)
15. Rutskyi, S. (2024). Tsyfrova propahanda v aspekti suchasnoho informatsiinoho protyborstva [Digital Propaganda in the Context of Contemporary Information Confrontation]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia: Filosofsko-politolohichni studii – Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series: Philosophical Political Studies, (55), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2024.55.51 (in Ukrainian)
16. Shmanatov, M. S. (2021). Tsyfrovi tekhnolohii yak faktor vplyvu na politychni protsesy: sproba kontseptualizatsii [Digital Technologies as a Factor Influencing Political Processes: An Attempt at Conceptualization]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia: Pytannia politolohii – The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, (40), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2021-40-04 (in Ukrainian)
17. Smith, A. (2018). Algorithms in action: The content people see on social media. pewresearch.org. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/16/algorithms-in-action-the-content-people-see-on-social-media/
18. Tamuli, P., & Dasgupta, A. (2025). Role of AI in Changing Landscape of Political Communication: Review and Changing Dynamics of Prevailing Situations. Technische Sicherheit, 25(6), 799–813. https://technikwissen.eu/wp-content/uploads/61-TSJ2965.pdf
19. Velasco Molpeceres, A., Miranda-Galbe, J., & Prieto Muñiz, M. (2025). Digital Political Communication in the European Parliament: A Comparative Analysis of Threads and X During the 2024 Elections. Journal Media, 6(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010042
20. Vysotska, O. (2024). Peculiarities of the Propaganda Transformation as an Instrument of Influence in the Metamodern Society. Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald. Series: Philosophy, Pedagogy, 1(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.54891/2786-7013-2024-1-3
21. Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20024652
22. Woolley, S. C. (2022). Digital Propaganda: The Power of Influencers. Journal of Democracy, 33(3), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2022.0027
23. Yanyshevskyi, S. S. (2023). Tsyfrova transformatsiia suspilstva, vplyv propahandy ta dezinformatsii v suspilstvi [Digital Transformation of Society, the Impact of Propaganda and Disinformation on Society]. Proceedings from the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Countering Disinformation in the Context of Russian Aggression Against Ukraine: Challenges and Prospects” (pp. 311–313). Kharkiv. https://doi.org/10.32782/PPSS.2023.1.81 (in Ukrainian)
24. Yuan, Y.-P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Tan, G. W.-H., Cham, T.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Aw, E. C.-X. et al. (2023). Government Digital Transformation: Understanding the Role of Government Social Media. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101775
25. Zhu, Y. (2024). How Propaganda Works in the Digital Era: Soft News as a Gateway. Digital Journalism, 12(6), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2156366
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Evgen Bondar