Abstract
The article provides a socio-philosophical analysis of the transformation of female subjectivity in the context of global wars and extreme crisis states of the 20th–21st centuries. The relevance of the study lies in the need to rethink traditional androcentric narratives in the security discourse, which marginalize women’s roles, limiting their image to that of victims of conflict or passive observers. The work aims to deconstruct patriarchal monopolies on war and identify mechanisms for the formation of a new female agency. The article is based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophical, sociological, historical, political, and cultural aspects. The methods of critical gender analysis, case studies, and deconstruction of mythological archetypes were used, which allowed the integration of philosophical concepts, in particular the concept of biopolitics by M. Foucault, into the modern discourse on war, violence, and social stability. War is not only a form of armed confrontation, but also a destructive catalyst that destroys the binary oppositions of male and female. The dialectical tension between two vectors of female experience was revealed: the female body as an object of biopolitical control (systematic violence, reproductive restrictions, genocidal practices) and female agency as a strategic response to the challenges of modernity. It was investigated that the participation of women in combat, management and peacemaking processes, in particular, using the examples of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the experience of Israel, Norway, Kurdistan, is not an episodic phenomenon, but an integral part of the survival strategy of society. It has been proven that patriarchal models of legitimization of violence are reinforced by archaic cultural codes, such as the archetypes of the kidnapped Europe or Medusa the Gorgon, which contribute to the stigmatization of victims and the exclusion of women from the space of security decision-making. Modern female subjectivity in times of crisis is an independent strategic resource capable of radically transforming the architecture of global security. The transition to a more inclusive world order requires not only institutional reforms. A fundamental deconstruction of cultural codes that justify the instrumentalization of the female body is necessary. Ukraine’s War of Independence became the rubicon where a radical social subjectivization of Ukrainian women takes place, transforming the experience of trauma and forced mobility into effective agency. Thus, the recognition of female subjectivity as an integral element of a stable world order is a necessary condition for overcoming cycles of violence and ensuring long-term social stability and harmonious development of society.
References
1. Baidak, M. S. (2018). Zhinka v umovakh viiny u svitli povsykdennykh praktyk (na materialakh Halychyny 1914–1921 rokiv) [A woman in war conditions in the light of everyday practices (based on materials of Galicia 1914–1921)] [Candidate Dissertation, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv]. https://lnu.edu.ua/wp–content/uploads/2018/03/dis_baidak.pdf (in Ukrainian)
2. Chisadza, K. (2025, May 22). Zhinky na viini ta sprava myru [Women at war and the cause of peace]. IPG Journal. https://www.ipg-journal.io/ua/rubriki/demokratichne-suspilstvo/zhinki-na-viini-ta-sprava-miru-2546/ (in Ukrainian)
3. Chupis, A. (2023). Zhinky u viiskovykh konfliktakh ta v povoiennii rozbudovi myru: svitovyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid [Women in military conflicts and post–war peacebuilding: Global and Ukrainian experience]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho yurydychnoho universytetu imeni Yaroslava Mudroho. Seriia: Filosofiia, filosofiia prava, politolohiia, sotsiolohiia, 1(56), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.21564/2663-5704.56.274023 (in Ukrainian)
4. Daniia vybachylyasia za prymusovyi kontrol narodzhuvanosti v Hrenlandii [Denmark apologized for forced birth control in Greenland]. (2025, August 28). Yevropeiska Pravda. https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2025/08/28/7218903/ (in Ukrainian)
5. Holomsha, M. (2019, June 27). Vykradennia Yevropy [The rape of Europe]. LB.ua. https://lb.ua/blog/mykola_golomsha/430646_vikradennya_ievropi_.html (in Ukrainian)
6. Hrinchenko, H., Kobchenko, K., & Kis, O. (Eds.). (2015). Zhinky Tsentralnoi ta Skhidnoi Yevropy u Druhii svitovii viini: Henderna spetsyfika dosvidu v chasy ekstremalnoho nasylstva [Women of Central and Eastern Europe in the Second World War: Gender specificity of experience in times of extreme violence]. TOV “Art–knyha”. (in Ukrainian)
7. Hula, R., Dzioban, O., Perederii, I., Pavlichenko, O., & Fil, H. (2020). Informatsiina viina: sotsialno–ontolohichnyi ta militarnyi aspekty [Information warfare: Social–ontological and military aspects]. Karavela. https://reposit.nupp.edu.ua/handle/PoltNTU/18037 (in Ukrainian)
8. Kiriukhina, M., & Khomiak, O. (2023). Istorychni podvyhy zhinok iz Ukrainy u viinah [Historical feats of women from Ukraine in wars]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Istorychni nauky, 34(73), 1, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-5984/2023/1.9 (in Ukrainian)
9. Lazarou, A. (2024). The myth of Gorgo/Medusa in ancient written sources. Proceedings of the European Academy of Sciences & Arts, (3), 30. https://doi.org/10.4081/peasa.30
10. Micciche, J. P. (2024, May 9). Concluding conflict: Why ending war is never an easy strategy. War Room. https://warroom.armywarcollege.edu/articles/concluding-conflict/
11. Myronovych, D. (2020, August 24). Zhinochyi dosvid viiny [Women’s experience of war]. Women and War. https://sociology.ucu.edu.ua/women-and-war/ (in Ukrainian)
12. Odintsova, A. (2019, January 28). Sestry po zbroi. Istorii kurdskykh zhinok – biitsiv [Sisters in arms: Stories of Kurdish women fighters]. NV. https://nv.ua/ukr/world/countries/sestri-po-zbroji-istoriji-kurdskih-zhinok-biyciv-50003465.html (in Ukrainian)
13. Radchenko, Ya. (2022, June 12). Seksualne nasylstvo pid chas viiny: shcho my znaiemo i yak mozhemo protydiiaty? [Sexual violence during war: What we know and how we can counteract it?]. Hender v detaliakh. https://genderindetail.org.ua/season-topic/dosvidy-viyny/sexualne-nasylstvo-pid-chas-viyny.html (in Ukrainian)
14. Seksualne ta henderne nasylstvo yak instrument viiny, protystoiannia yomu ye instrumentom myru [Sexual and gender–based violence as a tool of war, and resistance to it as a tool of peace]. (2020, June 19). Nonviolent Peaceforce. https://nonviolentpeaceforce.org/uk/international-day-for-the-elimination-of-sexual-violence-in-conflict/ (in Ukrainian)
15. Shevchuk, A., & Predmestnikov, O. (2024). Filosofiia informatsiinoi viiny: moralno–etychni problemy suchasnoho ukrainskoho suspilstva [Philosophy of information warfare: Moral and ethical problems of contemporary Ukrainian society]. Hrani, 27(5), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.15421/172488 (in Ukrainian)
16. Syniuk, O. (2022, November 24). Seksualne nasylstvo pid chas viiny: yak dosvid Bosnii i Hertsehovyny dopomozhe Ukraini [Sexual violence during war: How the experience of Bosnia and Herzegovina can help Ukraine]. Arhument. https://argumentua.com/stati/seksualne-nasilstvo-p-d-chas-v-ini-yak-dosv-d-bosn-gertsegovini-dopomozhe-ukra-n (in Ukrainian)
17. Tickner, J. A. (1997, December). You just don’t understand: Troubled engagements between feminists and IR theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00060
18. Tinin, D. (2023). Deiaki aspekty hendernoi rivnosti u voiennyi chas: yak viina zminiuie rol zhinok u suspilstvi [Some aspects of gender equality in wartime: How war changes women’s role in society]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriia: Pravo, 80(2), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.80.2.69 (in Ukrainian)
19. Tytarenko, T. M. (2020). Posttravmatychne zhyttietvorennia: sposoby dosiahnennia psykholohichnoho blahopoluchchia [Post–traumatic life creation: Ways of achieving psychological well–being]. Imeks–LTD. (in Ukrainian)
20. Yaremenko, K. (2015, March 11). Istoriia zhinok u Velykii viini [The history of women in the Great War]. Korydor. Zhurnal pro suchasnu kulturu. https://korydor.in.ua/ua/stories/women-in-war.html (in Ukrainian)
21. Zapolska, O. (2025, August 12). Rany henotsydu: yak zhinochi orhanizatsii Ruandy dopomahaiut suspilstvu vidnovliuvatysia [Wounds of genocide: How women’s organizations of Rwanda help society recover]. Hender v Detaliakh. https://genderindetail.org.ua/season-topic/feminism-in-detail/rany-henotsydu-yak-zhinochi-organizatsii-ruandy-dopomagayut-suspilstvu-vidnovlyuvatysia.html (in Ukrainian)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Uliana Maraieva, Liliia Tishko
