THEOLOGICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO THE EMERGENCE OF RELIGION
PDF

Keywords

religion
theological approach
scientific approach
church
reform
religious life
service
values
emergence of religion
religious consciousness
religious identity

How to Cite

Bogomaz, K., Lakhno, O., & Lahodych, M. (2025). THEOLOGICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO THE EMERGENCE OF RELIGION. Philosophy and Governance, (12(16). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2025.12.07

Abstract

The emergence of religion is a problem that has long troubled both the scientific community and the philosophical and theological discourse. The Church, its reformation and the development of religious life are closely connected with the general social transformations of society. The purpose of the article is to conduct an in-depth analysis of key narratives of scientific and theological approaches to the emergence of the phenomenon of religion. The study examines key approaches of the scientific and theological directions to the emergence of religion. A common feature of scientific concepts of religious consciousness is the desire for its impartial study as the most complex socio-cultural phenomenon that significantly affects the life of both an individual and society. At the same time, the theological approach interprets this as a supernatural act, revelation, or intervention of God, where religion is a response to God’s call, and science seeks universal laws, and theology is the truth of faith. The theological approach to the emergence of religion is a view of it from the inside, from the position of the corresponding religious experience, directly from the religion itself. Its basis is religious beliefs. Religion as a phenomenon was formed as a result of man’s desire to learn more deeply and fully about the peculiarities of the existence of the world, his own place and role in natural processes and society, and the influence of various factors on his existence. The study substantiates that science investigates how things came into being, theology investigates why (by God’s will). The study draws parallels between key approaches to the formation of religion as a defining phenomenon of social development, which imperceptibly continues to shape the directions of development of global society even today.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2025.12.07
PDF

References

1. Bowie, F. (2021). Anthropology of religion. In R. A. Segal, N. P. Roubekas (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion (pp. 1–24). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119092797.ch1

2. Charitos, I. A., Ballini, A., Cantore, S., Boccellino, M., Di Domenico, M., Borsani, E., ... & Bottalico, L. (2021). Stem cells: a historical review about biological, religious, and ethical issues. Stem Cells International, 2021(1), 9978837. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9978837

3. Ferngren, G. B. (2022). Science and religion. In The Routledge history of American science (pp. 200-214). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003112396-17

4. Gilson, Е. (2025). The Philosopher and Theology. Hannah Arendt Marginalia. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/hapl_marginalia_all/179

5. Harrison, P. (2015). The Territories of Science and Religion. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226184517.001.0001

6. Huxley, T. (2011). On the physical basis of life. In Victorian Science and Literature (Part I, Vol 3, pp. 109–128). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003550020-10/physical-basis-life-thomas-huxley

7. Leicht, C., Sharp, C. A., LaBouff, J. P., Zarzeczna, N., & Elsdon-Baker, F. (2022). Content matters: Perceptions of the science-religion relationship. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 32(3), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2021.2003111

8. Melnyk, S., Ravlinko, Z., Petrukha, N., Mokhonko, G., & Ohirko, O. (2023). Project Management for Ensuring Sustainable Development of the SocioEconomic System: A Case of Integral Assessment. Review of Economics and Finance, 21(1), 2287–2296. https://refpress.org/ref-vol21-a245

9. Phillips, P., Schiefelbein-Guerrero, K. & Kurlberg, J. (2019). Defining Digital Theology: Digital Humanities, Digital Religion and the Particular Work of the CODEC Research Centre and Network. Open Theology, 5(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0003

10. Polanyi, M. (2013). Science, Faith and Society: A searching examination of the meaning and nautre of scientific inquiry. University of Chicago Press. https://books.google.co.bw/books?id=z9knAgAAQBAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s

11. Serfontein, B. (2024). Evolving belief and being human: The emergence of religion in science and theology. Verbum et Ecclesia, 45(1), a2931. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v45i1.2931

12. Stolz, J., & Usunier, J. C. (2019). Religions as brands? Religion and spirituality in consumer society. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 16(1), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2018.1445008

13. Torrance, A. (2019). The possibility of a scientific approach to analytic theology. Journal of Analytic Theology, (7), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2019-7.001322191404

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Kostiantyn Bogomaz, Oleksandr Lakhno, Mykola Lahodych