Keywords
freedom
digital technologies
control
rights
philosophy of freedom
How to Cite
Abstract
The article offers a philosophical reflection on the phenomenon of freedom in digital reality, including an analysis of a number of fundamental aspects related to the nature of these phenomena and the potential risks associated with them. The study examines the impact of the transformation of the information and communication field on the structure and modification of the social living space, social and cultural aspects. The study highlights the ethical aspects of the integration of digital tools – algorithmic justice, data privacy, responsibility, etc. The methodology of interaction between a digital person and a digital society is substantiated and the conceptualization of the impact of technologies on the understanding of human choice is conceptualized. Attention is focused on the philosophy of the development of a creative society. Concern is expressed about the potential loss of identity by a person in the conditions of digital reality. It is substantiated that the adaptability of human consciousness expands the horizons of creative collaboration with the digital world, forming an unlimited potential for innovation. The study attempted to understand the essence of the relationship between the categories of “control” and “freedom” in the context of active integration of information and communication technologies. The definition of the phenomenon of freedom was determined, and its positive and negative forms were characterized. The author’s vision of the importance of preserving human freedom against the background of global digitalization was proposed. The important role of open interaction and dialogue between the public, the scientific community and government bodies was highlighted to guarantee the harmonious synergy of human rights and freedoms and the digital environment, compliance with digital rights to privacy, security, freedom of expression and access to a safe Internet. The results of the study are aimed at a philosophical understanding of digitalization, which requires a balanced approach aimed at creating a digital space that respects human rights and freedoms, rather than restricting them.
References
1. Capurro, R. (2014). Shapes of freedom in the digital age. 1st International Symposium, (31), 1–13. https://www.capurro.de/kastamonu.html
2. Pedersen, E. O., & Brincker, M. (2021). Philosophy and digitization: Dangers and possibilities in the new digital worlds. Sats, 22(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2021-0006
3. Campbell, J. A. (2019). Freedom, Self-Determination and Automation: Considering Political Impulses in the Age of Digitalization. Dialogue and Universalism, (1), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.5840/du201929110
4. Popova, N., Perchyk, A., Miazin, M., & Bednarskyi, S. (2024). Tsyfrovyi modern: filosofskyi pohliad na urbanizm i tsyfrovu humanitarystyku [Digital Modern: A Philosophical Perspective on Urbanism and Digital Humanities]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia “Filosofiia. Filosofski perypetii” – Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Philosophy. Philosophical Peripetias”, (70), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2024-70 (in Ukrainian)
5. Obiedkov, O. (2024). Kontseptualizatsija zviazku mizh svobodoyu i kontrolem cherez pryzmu tsyfrovizatsii [Conceptualization of the Connection Between Freedom and Control through the Prism of Digitalization]. “Visnyk NIuU imeni Yaroslava Mudroho”. Seriia: Filosofiia, filosofiia prava, politolohiia, sotsiolohiia – Bulletin of Yaroslav the Wise National University”. Series: Philosophy, Philosophy of Law, Political Science, Sociology, 1(60). https://doi.org/10.21564/2663-5704.60.299685 (in Ukrainian)
6. Erol, A. (2020). Freedom and control in the digital age. Human Affairs, 30(4), 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0050
7. Kyvliuk, O. P., Voronkova, H. V., & Nikitenko, V. O. (2023). Tsyfrovi prava yak vyrazhennia tsyfrovykh atrybutiv liudyny: sotsialno-filosofske obgruntuvannia [Digital rights as an expression of digital attributes of a person: socio-philosophical justification]. Osvitnii dyskurs – Educational discourse, 44(4-6). https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.44(4-6)-1 (in Ukrainian)
8. Voronkova, V., Niiktenko, V., Vasylchuk, H., Kahanov, Yu., & Metelenko, N. (2024). Formuvannia modeli forsaitu tsyfrovoi liudyny ta suspilstva dlia dosiahnennia tsilei staloho rozvytku [Formation of a foresight model of a digital person and society for achieving sustainable development goals]. Filosofiia osvity – Philosophy of Education, 18(95), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.32782/hst-2024-18-95-12 (in Ukrainian)
9. Dragu, T., & Lupu, Y. (2021). Digital authoritarianism and the future of human rights. International Organization, 75(4), 991–1017. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000624
10. Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14418
11. Dzoban, O. P. (2021). Tsyfrova liudyna yak filosofska problema [Digital Man as a Philosophical Problem]. Informatsiia i pravo – Information and Law, 2(37), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2021.2(37).238330 (in Ukrainian)
12. Ovcharuk, O. V. (2020). Suchasni pidkhody do rozvytku tsyfrovoi kompetentnosti liudyny ta tsyfrovoho hromadianstva v yevropeiskykh krainakh [Modern Approaches to the Development of Human Digital Competence and Digital Citizenship in European Countries]. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 76(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v76i2.3526 (in Ukrainian)
13. Kyrychenko, M. O. (2019). Rozvytok informatsiino-tekhnolohichnoi sfery ta yii vplyv na formuvannia tsyfrovoho svitohliadu ta tsyfrovoi ideolohii suchasnoi liudyny [Development of the Information and Technological Sphere and Its Influence on the Formation of a Digital Worldview and Digital Ideology of Modern Man]. Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA – Humanitarian Bulletin of the ZDIA, (77), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.30839/2072-7941.2019.177704 (in Ukrainian)
14. Radutnyi, O. E. (2018). Tsyfrova liudyna z tochky zoru zahalnoi ta informatsiinoi bezpeky: filosofskyi ta kryminalno-pravovyi aspekt [Digital man from the point of view of general and information security: philosophical and criminal-legal aspect]. Informatsiia i pravo – Information and Law, 2(25), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2018.2(25).273260 (in Ukrainian)
15. Honcharenko, K. S. (2019). Tsyfrova liudyna: fantazm vtraty identychnosti [Digital man: the phantasm of identity loss]. Filosofski obrii – Philosophical Horizons, (42), 137–140. http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0001153979 (in Ukrainian)
16. Kim, H. (2025). Philosophizing in the Era of AI. Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, (44), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.22916/jcpc.2025..44.5
17. Godwin, M. (2003). Cyber rights: Defending free speech in the digital age. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2258.001.0001
18. Risse, M. (2021). The fourth generation of human rights: Epistemic rights in digital lifeworlds. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 8(2), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2020-0039
19. Hanna, R., & Kazim, E. (2021). Philosophical foundations for digital ethics and AI Ethics: a dignitarian approach. AI and Ethics, 1(4), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00040-9
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Tetiana Tsoi, Viktoriia Lohvynenko, Mariya Shnitser