Abstract
The article examines the theoretical and methodological foundations of the institutionalization of project management within the system of local self-government through the lens of corporate governance principles. The relevance of the study is обусловлена the need to transition from the fragmented use of the project approach to its systematic integration in the context of martial law, post-war recovery, resource constraints, and increasing demands for transparency and accountability in managerial decision-making. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of institutionalization as a stage in the evolution of management systems that ensures the sustainability and reproducibility of project activities within territorial communities. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the theoretical and methodological foundations of the institutionalization of project management and to develop a conceptual model for its implementation based on corporate governance principles. The research employs systemic, structural-functional, comparative, and logical generalization methods, which enable a comprehensive analysis of contemporary approaches to organizing management processes in territorial communities. The results of the study demonstrate that the institutionalization of project management involves the formation of stable regulatory, organizational, procedural, human resource, and digital components that ensure the alignment between strategic planning and project implementation. The role of corporate governance principles such as transparency, accountability, responsibility, and stakeholder orientation are identified as the foundation for building an effective management system. The article proposes an original definition of the institutionalization of project management. It develops a conceptual model based on the integration of three levels of governance (strategic, institutional, and operational), three mechanisms (regulation, coordination, and control), and three outcomes (efficiency, accountability, and trust). It is substantiated that implementing the proposed model enables the transition from the synergy of management approaches to the institutional sustainability of territorial community development management. The practical significance of the results lies in their applicability to improving the performance of local self-government bodies, enhancing project management practices, and ensuring transparency in resource utilization. The conclusions emphasize that the institutionalization of project management constitutes a key direction for the modernization of public administration under contemporary challenges. Further research should focus on developing indicators of institutional capacity based on corporate governance principles, advancing the digitalization of management processes, and adapting institutional models to post-war recovery conditions.
References
1. Godenhjelm, S., Lundin, R. A., & Sjöblom, S. (2015). Projectification in the public sector – the case of the European Union. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(2), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2014-0049
2. Jakobsen, R. (2022). Public Sector Projectification – A Systematic Review of the Literature. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 26(4), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v26i4.10588
3. Gasik, S. (2023). Some insights on the future of project management in public administration. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 14(3), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v14i3.25043
4. Van der Waldt, G. (2011). The uniqueness of public sector project management: A contextual perspective. Politeia, 30(2), 66–87. http://hdl.handle.net/10394/13426
5. Blaskovics, B., Maró, Z. M., Klimkó, G., Papp-Horváth, V., & Csiszárik-Kocsir, Á. (2023). Differences between Public-Sector and Private-Sector Project Management Practices in Hungary from a Competency Point of View. Sustainability, 15(14), 11236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411236
6. Vasiutynska, L. A., Zhuravel, O. V., & Komarovskyi, I. V. (2025). Proiektnyi menedzhment v sferi publichnoho upravlinnia: suchasni konotatsii rozvytku [Project management in public administration: modern development connotations]. Ekonomichnyi prostir, (199), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.199.149-153 (in Ukrainian)
7. Bezverkhniuk, T. M., Kotova, N. O., & Popov, S. A. (2011). Upravlinnia proiektamy v publichnii sferi [Project management in the public sphere]. ORIDU NADU. (in Ukrainian)
8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). Infrastructure governance. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/infrastructure-governance.html
9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). Governance. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/governance.html
10. Perrin, D. (n.d.). Mixed methods in project management research: Trends and best practices. The Project Manager. https://theprojectmgr.com/mixed-methods-in-project-management-research-trends-and-best-practices/
11. Wagner, R., Huemann, M., & Radujković, M. (2022). An institutional theory perspective on the role of project management associations for projectification of society: The case of Germany. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(8), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2021-0259
12. Crawford, L. H., & Helm, J. (2009). Government and governance: The value of project management in the public sector. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20107
13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). Corporate governance. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/corporate-governance.html
14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/principles-corporate-governance/
15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). Public sector transparency and accountability. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264176287-en
16. Monteiro, A., Varajão, J., & Santos, V. (2025). Project management office typologies, types, and functions: a systematic analysis of the literature and directions for research. Project Management Journal, 56(5), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241297899
17. Lappi, T. M., Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2019). Project governance and portfolio management in government digitalization. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 13(2), 159–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2018-0068
18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2026). Digital government review of Biscay, Spain. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/digital-government-review-of-biscay-spain_ab35c0ea-en.html
19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). Digital transformation. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/digital-transformation.html
20. Müller, R. (2009). Project Governance (Fundamentals of project management). Ashgate Publishing Group.
21. Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). Project governance: A framework for success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006
22. Turner, J. R., & Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-0
23. Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V., & Gorod, A. (2016). Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002
24. Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2010). A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.001
25. World Bank. (2023). Ukraine rapid damage and needs assessment (RDNA3). https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ukraine/publication/rdna3
26. Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Kateryna Rovynska
