FORMATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION METHODS FOR SMART CITY GOVERNANCE IN UKRAINE’S AGGLOMERATION CENTRES: CHALLENGES, TOOLS, AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES
PDF

Keywords

Smart City
public administration
agglomeration
digital governance
resilience
Smart Governance Index
Lviv agglomeration

How to Cite

Pfister, D. (2026). FORMATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION METHODS FOR SMART CITY GOVERNANCE IN UKRAINE’S AGGLOMERATION CENTRES: CHALLENGES, TOOLS, AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES. Philosophy and Governance, (2(18). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2026.2.03

Abstract

The article substantiates theoretical and methodological approaches to the formation and improvement of public administration methods for Smart City governance in Ukraine’s agglomeration centres under conditions of digital transformation and wartime challenges. It is determined that Smart City should be considered not as a set of technological solutions, but as an integrated public administration system based on strategic planning, project management, data governance, and stakeholder communication. The study identifies key conceptual, institutional, financial, technological, and security challenges in implementing Smart City in large urban agglomerations. Special attention is paid to the transformation of Smart City into a resilience tool under war conditions, ensuring continuity of critical services, infrastructure stability, and adaptive governance. An instrumental model for improving public administration methods through Smart City tools is proposed, integrating strategic, operational, analytical, and communication blocks into a unified governance framework. Based on international methodologies and Ukrainian realities, a scientific and methodological approach to ranking Smart City readiness in Ukraine is developed using an integrated Smart Governance Index. The Lviv Agglomeration Association is analysed as a practical case demonstrating effective intermunicipal cooperation and the transition from Smart City to Smart Agglomeration governance. The results confirm that Smart City effectiveness depends on the integration of digital tools into public administration methods and the formation of institutionalised governance models. The proposed model can serve as a basis for improving Smart City governance in Ukraine’s agglomeration centres and enhancing their resilience and sustainable development.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2026.2.03
PDF

References

1. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2289–2297). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615

2. City of Kraków. (2023). Smart City Kraków: Strategic and programme materials. Kraków: Municipality of Kraków.

3. Herasymenko, O., & Kalahurka, V. (2024). Modernization of administrative services in Ukraine under global challenges. Financial Space, 3–4(54), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.30970/fp.3-4(54).2024.113121122

4. Herasymenko, O., Khoptiana, S., & Harbych, A. (2025). Digital tools for adapting public management to crisis situations. Financial Space, 4(58), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.30970/fp.4(58).2025.465859

5. IESE Business School. (2024). IESE Cities in Motion Index 2024. Barcelona: IESE Business School, University of Navarra.

6. Karpinsky, B., Karpinska, O., & Pfister, D. (2022). Strategic architecture of smart infrastructure systems in urban agglomerations of Ukraine. In Moderní aspekty vědy: XXI. Díl mezinárodní kolektivní monografie (pp. 306–330). Mezinárodní Ekonomický Institut s.r.o. https://perspectives.pp.ua/public/site/mono/monography-21.pdf

7. Karpinsky, B., Pfister, D., & Karpinska, O. (2023). The formation and development of public administration methods in support of a comprehensive Smart City system in metropolitan areas. In Proceedings of the 2022 Annual Scientific Conference of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv (pp. 163–168). Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.

8. Karpinskyi, B. A., Karpinska, O. B., & Pfister, D. H. (2022). Fundamentals of smart urbanism based on state-building patriotism: A strategic management approach. Scientific Perspectives, 7(25), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2022-7(25)-232-252

9. Komarnytska, H. (2025). Smart City in the system of open data and e-government. Aspects of Public Administration, 13(3), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.15421/152535

10. Lviv City Council. (2025). Materials and informational resources on the city’s digital transformation and intermunicipal coordination within the Lviv metropolitan area. Lviv City Council. https://city-adm.lviv.ua/

11. OECD. (2015). OECD principles on water governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/topics/policy-sub-issues/water-governance/oecd-principles-on-water-governance-en.pdf

12. OECD. (2019). The path to becoming a data-driven public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/059814a7-en

13. Podolchak, N. (2025). Public administration mechanisms for the development of innovation infrastructure in the context of Industry 4.0. Scientific Innovations and Advanced Technologies, 9(49), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2025-9(49)-266-278

14. Podolchak, N., Martyniuk, V., & Tsygylyk, N. (2024). Synergistic aspects of achieving a high level of efficiency in personnel management of organizations to ensure sustainable development. In 2024 14th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT) (pp. 330–333). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT62333.2024.10712497

15. Podolchak, N., Stetsiv, I., & Korchynska, O. (2025). Smart-recovery: Innovations and technologies in the public administration system. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, (15), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2025.15.292

16. Protsіuk, N. (2024). Conceptual basis of interpreting the essence of smart city infrastructure in the context of sustainable development. Scientific Innovations and Advanced Technologies, 1(29), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2024-1(29)-116-127

17. Protsіuk, N. (2025). Mechanisms for cross-sectoral partnerships in the development of smart urban infrastructure. In Innowacje finansowe i zarządcze jako stymulator zrównoważonego rozwoju w warunkach współczesnych wyzwań (pp. 552–556). MANS w Łomży. https://doi.org/10.58246/VERT4301

18. Reshota, O. (2025). Modernization of interaction mechanisms between public authorities, business structures, and civil society institutions under contemporary challenges. Scientific Perspectives, 4(58), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2025-4(58)-374-387

19. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2024). World cities report 2024: Cities and climate action. Nairobi: UN-Habitat. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789211065602

20. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Dmytro Pfister