MANAGEMENT AS THE BASIS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE
PDF

Keywords

public administration
integrity principles
decision-making processes
institutional effectiveness
transparency
accountability
regulatory mechanisms
governance quality

How to Cite

Pylypko, A. (2026). MANAGEMENT AS THE BASIS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE. Philosophy and Governance, (3(19). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2026.3.04

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the increasing complexity of socio-economic processes, the transformation of the public administration system, and the rising demands for transparency, accountability, and efficiency of public authorities. In contemporary scientific discourse, good governance is viewed as a conceptual model of public authority organization based on the principles of legality, openness, the rationality of managerial decisions, and the government's responsibility to society. At the same time, in practice, there is a contradiction between the normatively proclaimed principles of good governance and the mechanisms for their implementation, highlighting the need for a scientific understanding of management as a fundamental factor in the formation of an effective and ethically responsible system of public authority. The purpose of the article is to provide a theoretical substantiation of the role of management as the foundation of good governance and to determine the significance of the integrity and reasonableness of managerial decisions in ensuring the responsible and effective activity of public governance institutions. The study employs general scientific and specialized methods, including analysis, deduction, generalization, and systematization of scientific sources, comparative and structural-logical analysis of management approaches, as well as conceptual generalization to define the interconnection between management, integrity, and the reasonableness of managerial decision-making. The study analyzes theoretical approaches to understanding management as a socio-philosophical category and defines its significance in the formation of good governance. The interconnection between managerial activity, integrity, and the reasonableness of managerial decisions is established as the basis for responsible managerial behavior. It is substantiated that the implementation of good governance is linked to the introduction of all stages of the management process and modern management concepts, including strategic management, evidence-based governance, network, and digital governance. Scientific and practical problems of the discrepancy between governance and management are identified, particularly regarding the assurance of integrity and reasonableness in decision-making, the gap between the normative model of good governance and actual public administration practices, the formalization of ethical standards, the limited reasonableness of managerial decisions, and insufficient institutional alignment of managerial mechanisms. It is proven that management serves as the fundamental basis of good governance, as it is through the system of managerial decisions, institutional mechanisms, and managerial practices that the principles of transparency, accountability, efficiency, and social responsibility of authority are realized. It is established that the integration of the principles of integrity and reasonableness into the process of managerial decision-making is a necessary condition for forming a responsible model of public management and strengthening institutional trust in government bodies. Prospects for further research are related to the development of methodological approaches to evaluating the activities of government officials regarding their compliance with the stages of the management process and the reasonableness of managerial decisions, as well as the study of institutional mechanisms for the preventive selection of high-integrity personnel and the analysis of the impact of digital governance tools on the efficiency of the public management system.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2026.3.04
PDF

References

1. Svirko, S. V., Dyka, O. S., Trosteniuk, T. M., Sydorenko, O. P., & Zahurskyi, V. F. (2024). Pryntsypy nalezhnoho uriaduvannia na suchasnomu etapi rozvytku liudstva: katehoryzatsiia ta kontseptualizatsiia [Principles of good governance at the current stage of human development: categorization and conceptualization]. Ekonomika, upravlinnia ta administruvannia – Economy, management and administration, 3(109), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2024-3(109)-74-90 (in Ukrainian)

2. Dniprov, O. (2021). Pryntsypy nalezhnoho uriaduvannia v suchasnii systemi administratyvnoho prava Ukrainy [Principles of good governance in the modern system of administrative law of Ukraine]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, economy and law, (1), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2021.1.19 (in Ukrainian)

3. Svirko, S., Dyka, O., Trosteniuk, T., Sydorenko, O., & Zahurskyi, V. (2024). Upravlinnia derzhavnymy finansamy v konteksti nalezhnoho uriaduvannia [Public finance management in the context of good governance]. Finansovo-kredytna diialnist: problemy teorii ta praktyky – Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 6(59), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.59.2024.4530 (in Ukrainian)

4. Pankratova, V. O. (2025). Teoretyko-pravovi pidkhody do vyznachennia roli ta znachennia nalezhnoho uriaduvannia [Theoretical and legal approaches to determining the role and significance of good governance]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo – Analytical and comparative jurisprudence, 1(4), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.04.1.16 (in Ukrainian)

5. Horodnichenko, I., Habriielian, A., & Lihanenko, I. (2025). Filosofsko-istorychni zasady rozvytku upravlinskykh shkil XX stolittia [Philosophical and historical foundations of the development of management schools of the twentieth century]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, (79). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-79-46 (in Ukrainian)

6. Pashov, R. I. (2023). Politychna kultura ta hromadianska vidpovidalnist – zaporuka rozvytku suchasnoho demokratychnoho uriaduvannia v Ukraini [Political culture and civic responsibility as a prerequisite for the development of modern democratic governance in Ukraine]. In Suchasni problemy upravlinnia. Shliakh do staloho myru pislia viiny: derzhava, biznes, innovatsii: zbirnyk materialiv XII Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Kyiv, November 24, 2023) (pp. 198–200). Kyiv: KPI imeni Ihoria Sikorskoho, Vydavnytstvo “Politekhnika”. https://ktpu.kpi.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Suchasni-problemy-upravlinnya-2023.pdf#page=198 (in Ukrainian)

7. Humen, Yu. Ye. (2021). Metodolohichna osnova protsesu demokratychnoho vriaduvannia v teorii derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Methodological basis of the process of democratic governance in the theory of public administration]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava – Socio-economic problems and the state, 2(25), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2022.02.681 (in Ukrainian)

8. Sari, A. R. (2023). The impact of good governance on the quality of public management decision making. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.21

9. Karunia, R. L., Solihati, K. D., & Wati, N. K. (2022). Implementation of Good Governance Principles in the Land Transportation Management Center. KnE Social Sciences, 7(9), 1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i9.11014

10. Beshi, T. D., & Kaur, R. (2020). Public trust in local government: Explaining the role of good governance practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6

11. Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., & Federico, J. S. (2021). A (re)view of the philosophical foundations of strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 151–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12244

12. Scherer, A. G., & Voegtlin, C. (2020). Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(2), 182–208. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0175

13. El Kezazy, H., Hilmi, Y., Ezzahra, E. F., & Hocine, I. Z. H. (2024). Conceptual model of the role of territorial management controller and good governance. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(7), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-068

14. Barbier, L., & Tengeh, R. (2023). Literature review of public administration and good governance from 1890 to 2023. Jurnal Transformative, 9(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.3

15. Rubio-Andrés, M., Ramos-González, M. D. M., Sastre-Castillo, M. Á., & Danvila-del-Valle, I. (2020). Exploring sustainability, good governance, and social responsibility in small and medium enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 852–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1849

16. OPSI. (2026). eProcurement system ProZorro. https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/eprocurement-system-prozorro/

17. Mitchell, S. L., Packard, M. D., & Clark, B. B. (2023). Good governance, bad governance: A refinement and application of key governance concepts. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 17(4), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2023.132119

18. Afifi, A. A. (2024). Islamic moral ethics: The foundations for good governance, management, and civilizational advancement. Perwakilan: Journal of Good Governance, Diplomacy, Customary Institutionalization and Social Networks, 2(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.58764/j.prwkl.2024.2.84

19. El Kezazy, H., & Hilmi, Y. (2023). Improving good governance through management control in local authorities. International Review of Management and Computer, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10577979

20. Pylypko, A. G. (2005). Theoretical foundations of public administration of agricultural production. Current problems of public administration, 2(25), 37. Kharkiv: Publishing House of Kharkiv Research Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences “Magister”.

21. Pylypko, A. G. (2016). Fundamentals of administration. Fundamentals of public administration / or how to increase Ukraine’s rating according to the International Happiness Index. Kharkiv: PVPP “Slovo”.

22. Pylypko, A. G. (2025). Ethical system of Reasonableness: justification of the concept and operationalization of criteria. Bulletin of Humanities, (13). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.17959057

23. Pylypko, A. G. (2025). Honesty as a sign of a person’s ability to act reasonably. Current Problems of Philosophy and Sociology, (57). http://apfs.nuoua.od.ua/57-2025

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Anatoliy Pylypko