THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS FOR PROTECTING BUSINESS RIGHTS IN THE TAX SPHERE
PDF

Keywords

administrative procedural law
protection of rights
business entities
corporate legal relations
administrative proceedings
economic activity
tax regulation

How to Cite

Klymenko, A., Marushchak, V., & Rovynskyi, Y. (2026). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS FOR PROTECTING BUSINESS RIGHTS IN THE TAX SPHERE. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, (16). https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2026.4.24

Abstract

The article examines the peculiarities of the functioning of administrative procedural mechanisms for the protection of the rights of business entities in the tax sphere under the conditions of modern judicial reform and the development of administrative proceedings in Ukraine. The essence and significance of administrative procedural mechanisms as a system of legal instruments aimed at ensuring the realization of the business sector’s right to effective protection in relations with supervisory authorities are analyzed. It is determined that the main mechanisms include administrative appeal against decisions of tax authorities, judicial protection within administrative proceedings, procedural guarantees during tax inspections, as well as mechanisms of evidence and enforcement of court decisions. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the specific features of tax disputes, which are manifested in the high level of procedural formalization, the complexity of legal regulation, the need for specialized knowledge in the field of tax law, and the significant role of evidence in the process of protecting the rights of business entities. It is substantiated that the effectiveness of the protection of business rights largely depends on the accessibility, efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of administrative procedural mechanisms. The paper identifies the main problems related to the realization of the right of business entities to protection in the tax sphere. Among them are lengthy consideration of tax disputes, excessive formalization of administrative procedures, inequality of procedural opportunities of the parties, overburdening of administrative courts, imperfections in legal regulation, and a low level of business trust in supervisory authorities. It is noted that the existence of such problems negatively affects the level of legal certainty, complicates the realization of the right to effective judicial protection, and creates additional obstacles to business activity. The study separately examines promising directions for improving administrative procedural mechanisms for the protection of business rights in the tax sphere. The necessity of simplifying administrative appeal procedures, reducing the time limits for dispute resolution, strengthening procedural guarantees of the parties, improving the mechanisms for enforcement of court decisions, and introducing digital technologies into the field of administrative proceedings is substantiated. It is established that the development of e-justice, electronic document management, and digital services will contribute to improving access to justice, increasing the transparency of supervisory authorities, and enhancing the effectiveness of judicial protection of the rights of business entities. It is concluded that the improvement of administrative procedural mechanisms for the protection of business rights in the tax sphere should be carried out comprehensively and aimed at ensuring a balance between the interests of the state in the field of tax control and guarantees for the protection of the rights of business entities.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2026.4.24
PDF

References

1. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]. (1996). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254k/96-vr#Text (іn Ukrainian)

2. Podatkovyi Kodeks Ukrainy [Tax Code of Ukraine]. (2010). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17#Text (іn Ukrainian)

3. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini [Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine]. (2005). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text (іn Ukrainian)

4. Bytiak, Yu. P. (2020). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy [Administrative law of Ukraine]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (іn Ukrainian)

5. Paseniuk, O. M. (2018). Administratyvne sudochynstvo Ukrainy [Administrative judicial proceedings of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter. (іn Ukrainian)

6. Kivalov, S. V. (2018). Administratyvne sudochynstvo Ukrainy [Administrative judicial proceedings of Ukraine]. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura. (іn Ukrainian)

7. Kolomoiets, T. O. (2019). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy [Administrative law of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Istyna. (іn Ukrainian)

8. Averianov, V. B. (2019). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Akademichnyi kurs [Administrative law of Ukraine. Academic course] (Vol. 1). Kyiv: Yurydychna dumka. (іn Ukrainian)

9. Smokovych, M. I. (2020). Sudovyi zakhyst u publichno-pravovykh sporakh: teoriia ta praktyka [Judicial protection in public law disputes: Theory and practice]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter. (іn Ukrainian)

10. Stetsenko, S. H. (2021). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy [Administrative law of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Alerta. (іn Ukrainian)

11. Barabash, O. O. (2023). Tsyfrovizatsiia pravosuddia u konteksti vprovadzhennia informatsiinykh tekhnolohii [Digitalization of justice in the context of information technology implementation]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav – Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, (3), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.32782/2311-8040/2023-1-8 (іn Ukrainian)

12. Kovaliv, M., & Sydor, M. (2024). Realizatsiia administratyvnoho sudochynstva na osnovi tsyfrovoi platformy [Implementation of administrative proceedings based on a digital platform]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriia yurydychna – Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Legal Series, (2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.32782/2311-8040/2024-2-6 (іn Ukrainian)

13. Zghama, A. O. (2024). Tsyfrova transformatsiia pravosuddia v Ukraini [Digital transformation of justice in Ukraine]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo – Analytical and comparative law, (4), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.06.52 (іn Ukrainian)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Anastasiia Klymenko, Volodymyr Marushchak, Yurii Rovynskyi