PROTECTION OF TAX SOVEREIGNTY OF UKRAINE AND THE EU IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SPREAD OF TRANSFER PRICING AND OFFSHORE JURISDICTIONS
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

transfer pricing
offshore jurisdictions
tax sovereignty
EU integration
financial security

How to Cite

Pirnykoza, P. (2025). PROTECTION OF TAX SOVEREIGNTY OF UKRAINE AND THE EU IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SPREAD OF TRANSFER PRICING AND OFFSHORE JURISDICTIONS. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, (3). https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.3.07

Abstract

Under modern conditions of globalization, the problem of preserving the tax sovereignty of states becomes particularly urgent, as the active use of transfer pricing (TP) and offshore jurisdictions results in significant budget losses and distorts competitive conditions. For Ukraine, this issue acquires additional importance in the context of post-war recovery and the drive towards EU integration, where strengthened international standards in combating aggressive tax planning are in force. The purpose of this article is to identify the key factors influencing the tax sovereignty of Ukraine and EU member states through transfer pricing and offshoring, as well as to develop scientifically grounded recommendations aimed at preventing tax revenue losses in the context of closer alignment with the European tax space and post-war reconstruction. The article analyzes the scale and dynamics of offshore jurisdictions and TP methods used from 2005 to 2024, and evaluates their impact on budget revenues. By employing a multi-faceted approach, it was found that the share of revenues lost in Ukraine due to imperfect TP regulation and capital outflows to offshore jurisdictions is higher than in most EU countries. This is driven by both the lower capacity of supervisory bodies and the absence of a unified methodological approach to calculating losses. It has been established that international initiatives (BEPS, EU directives) and national reforms (Law No. 466, introduction of controlled foreign company rules) can substantially strengthen fiscal control and reduce profit shifting, particularly against the backdrop of intensified tax information exchange among countries. The insufficient harmonization of methods for assessing lost budgetary resources complicates comparisons of the effectiveness of regulatory measures between Ukraine and the EU. Hence, a priority is to develop a shared methodology and to continue harmonizing Ukraine’s legislation with European norms in the field of taxation. This will promote the strengthening of the state’s tax sovereignty, reduce budgetary losses, and foster equal business conditions, which is especially crucial in the course of economic reconstruction.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.3.07
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Antonyuk, A., Popovych, Z., Faccio, T., & Stack, G. (2018). Profit shifting in Ukraine’s iron ore exports. GUE/NGL. https://left.eu/app/uploads/2018/09/180911_Study_Tax_Avoidance_UA.pdf

2. Kvasovskyi, O. R., & Rudan, V. Ya. (2024). Teoretyko-kontseptualni ta naukovo-prykladni dominanty polityky transfernoho tsinoutvorennia subiektiv hospodariuvannia [The theoretical-conceptual and scientific-applied dominants of the transfer pricing policy of economic entities]. Ekonomichnyi analiz, 34(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2024.01.165 (in Ukrainian)

3. Cobham, A., & Janský, P. (2018). Global distribution of revenue loss from corporate tax avoidance: Re-estimation and country results. Journal of International Development, 30(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3348

4. Hobela, V., Podra, O., Batyuk, B., Levkiv, H., & Hynda, O. (2022). The Ukrainian economy offshoring: Estimation of factors’ impact and developing measures to combat. Business: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2022.14509

5. Melnyk, O. P. (2024). Transferne tsinoutvorennia pry zdiisnenni kontrolovanykh operatsii platnykamy podatkiv [Transfer pricing in controlled transactions conducted by taxpayers]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo, (4), 395–399. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.04.64 (in Ukrainian)

6. Podra, O. P., & Stambulska, Kh. B. (2022). Ofshorni iurysdyktsii yak instrument minimalizatsii podatkovoho navantazhennia [Offshore jurisdictions as a tool for minimizing the tax burden]. Management and Entrepreneurship in Ukraine: The Stages of Formation and Problems of Development, 4(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.23939/smeu2022.01.167 (in Ukrainian)

7. Feniushyn, V. V. (2023). Finansovo-pravove rehuliuvannia diialnosti ofshornykh kompanii ta osoblyvosti yikh opodatkuvannia [Financial and legal regulation of offshore companies’ activities and features of their taxation]. Molodyi vchenyi, 10(122), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2023-10-122-33 (in Ukrainian)

8. European Commission. (2025.). Tax revenue statistics. Eurostat. https://surl.li/rfelpd

9. CEIC Data. (2025). Ukraine tax revenue: % of GDP. https://surl.li/yrozsg

10. Derzhavnyi veb-portal dlia hromadian [State web portal for citizens]. (n.d.). https://openbudget.gov.ua/?month=12&year=2022&-budgetType=NATIONAL (in Ukrainian)

11. European Commission. (n.d.). Total revenue from taxes and social contributions, EU and euro area (% of GDP, 1995–2023). Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title

12. Shaxson, N. (2019). The billions attracted by tax havens do harm to sending and receiving nations alike. Finance & Development (September 2019). International Monetary Fund (IMF). https://surl.li/tgohto

13. EU Tax Observatory. (2024). Global Tax Evasion Report 2024. https://surl.li/fuuwef

14. European Commission. (2023). Annual report on taxation 2023: Review of taxation policies in EU Member States. https://surl.li/rlxwrl

15. Mycyk, A. (2023). The Cyprus bailout: Will Ukraine find itself a new haven for direct foreign investments? Financier Worldwide Magazine. https://surl.li/vupafv

16. Pogrebna, A. (n.d.). Ukraine progresses with BEPS implementation. Financier Worldwide Magazine. https://surl.li/qpfici

17. EY Global. (n.d.). Ukraine signs Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent BEPS. https://surl.li/ihhqqb

18. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020, January 16). Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy shchodo vdoskonalennia administruvannia podatkiv, usunennia tekhnichnykh ta lohichnykh neuzghodzhen u podatkovomu zakonodavstvi: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.01.2020 № 466-IX [On amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine regarding the improvement of tax administration, elimination of technical and logical inconsistencies in tax legislation: Law of Ukraine No. 466-IX, dated January 16, 2020]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/466-20#Text/ (in Ukrainian)

19. TPA Global. (2022). Ukraine transfer pricing country summary report 2022. https://surl.li/xbyqxt

20. Deloitte. (2023). Ukraine tax highlights 2023. https://surl.li/guzprq

21. World Economic Forum. (2024). What does the OECD global minimum tax mean for global cooperation? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/02/oecd-minimum-tax-rate

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Pavlo Pirnykoza