Abstract
The article examines the methodological foundations for analyzing partnership mechanisms within the public governance system under conditions of global transformations. It substantiates that the contemporary transformation of public governance is characterized by a shift from the traditional hierarchical model of interaction toward partnership-based, networked, and collaborative forms of governance, which involve the engagement of both state and non-state actors in the processes of public policy formulation and implementation. It is determined that partnership in the modern governance environment serves not only as a tool for coordinating the activities of various actors but also as a strategic mechanism for strengthening state institutional capacity, ensuring transparency, openness, and the creation of public value. The study systematizes the main scientific approaches to the analysis of partnership mechanisms, including systemic, institutional, network, actor-oriented, and value-based approaches. The role of network governance as a methodological foundation for examining horizontal interaction between public authorities, local self-government bodies, civil society organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders is revealed. It is established that the effectiveness of partnership models is determined not only by regulatory and legal conditions but also by the level of trust, the quality of communication, institutional culture, coordination capacity, and the ability to develop and implement collective governance decisions. Particular attention is paid to the institutional environment for partnership development in Ukraine under the conditions of European integration, decentralization, digital transformation, and post-war recovery. The necessity of transitioning from formal models of public engagement toward genuine mechanisms of participation and co-creation of public policy is substantiated. It is determined that a promising direction for further research is the development of a comprehensive methodology for assessing the effectiveness of partnership mechanisms based on the criteria of institutional resilience, social trust, innovativeness, and public value creation.
References
1. Bakalova, E. G. (2022). Contextualizing and Understanding of Governance Network in Public Sector. Journal Dimensie Management and Public Sector, 3(3), https://hdpublication.com/index.php/jdmps/article/view/160/188
2. Busscher, T., Verweij, S., & van den Brink, M. (2022). Private management of public networks? Unpacking the relationship between network management strategies in infrastructure implementation. Governance, (35), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12602
3. Osborne, S. P., Nasi, G., & Powell, M. (2021). Beyond co-production: Value creation and public services. Public Admin, (99), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12718
4. Sørensen, E., & Triantafillou, P. (2009). The Politics of Self-Governance: An Introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315554259-1
5. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
6. Casprini, E., & Palumbo, R. (2022). Reaping the benefits of digital transformation through Public-Private Partnership: A service ecosystem view applied to healthcare. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(4), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00056-9
7. Hodge, G., & Greve, C. (2013). Introduction: Public-private Partnership in Turbulent Times. In C. Greve, & G. Hodge (Eds.). Rethinking Public-Private Partnerships: Strategies for Turbulent Times (pp. 1–32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108130
8. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1416542
9. Ostrom, E. (2012). Polycentric Systems: Multilevel Governance Involving a Diversity of Organizations. In Global Environmental Commons: Analytical and Political Challenges in Building Governance Mechanisms. Oxford University Press. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/25240
10. OECD. (2026). Public Governance Review of Ukraine. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/public-governance-review-of-ukraine_7810f059-en.html
11. Mykhailovska, O., & Filipova, N. (2022). Teoretychnyi kontur publichno-upravlinskoi vzaiemodii [Theoretical outline of public-administrative interaction]. Naukovi pratsi Mizhrehionalnoi akademii upravlinnia personalom. Politychni nauky ta publichne upravlinnia – Scientific Works of the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Science and Public Administration, 1(61). https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2022-1(61)-5 (in Ukrainian)
12. Bryson, J., & George, B. (2020). Strategic Management in Public Administration. In E. Hannah (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1396
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Oksana Parkhomenko-Kutsevil