QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGIES IN CANDIDATE COUNTRIES FOR ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION
PDF

Keywords

anti-corruption strategy
public administration
candidate states
European Union
effectiveness index
corruption
law enforcement

How to Cite

Novoskoltseva, L. (2026). QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGIES IN CANDIDATE COUNTRIES FOR ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION. Public Management and Policy, (4(20). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2026.4.06

Abstract

This article provides a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of anti-corruption strategies in European Union candidate states. The relevance of the study is driven by the fact that anti-corruption capacity constitutes one of the key prerequisites for meeting the political criteria for membership; however, the formal existence of strategies does not always reflect their actual performance. The study aims to develop an integral approach to the comparative assessment of anti-corruption strategy effectiveness in candidate countries and to identify country clusters by level of institutional performance. The methodology is based on a combination of index analysis, a comparative approach, content analysis of European Commission reports, and author-developed indicator normalization. The model incorporates four components: the level of corruption perception, the dynamics of change, the European Commission’s readiness assessment in the area of anti-corruption, and the practical effectiveness of law enforcement. The results demonstrate that Albania, Moldova, and Montenegro received the highest composite scores; however, their profiles differ considerably: Albania exhibits a stronger law enforcement component, Moldova shows the most favorable positive dynamics, and Montenegro displays a relatively stable institutional base. Ukraine occupied an intermediate position, which reflects a combination of a positive anti-corruption track record with limited progress and institutional resilience risks. The lowest scores were recorded for Turkey, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia, where formal anti-corruption constraints are not accompanied by sufficient public trust, stable dynamics, or credible law enforcement. The practical significance of the study lies in the potential use of the proposed index as a preliminary diagnostic tool for governments, public administration bodies, and expert communities.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2026.4.06
PDF

References

1. European Commission. (2025a). 2025 communication on EU enlargement policy. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/eb69a890-40d6-4696-801e-612d51709fdd_en?filename=2025+Communication+on+EU+Enlargement+Policy.pdf

2. European Commission. (2025b). Albania 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/fe9138b7-90fe-4277-a12c-3a03f6d1957f_en?filename=albania-report-2025.pdf

3. European Commission. (2025c). Bosnia and Herzegovina 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/5d8fc547-f8f8-456f-84e3-b38998acfafd_en?filename=bosnia-and-herzegovina-report-2025.pdf

4. European Commission. (2025d). Georgia 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/b3089ad4-26be-4c6a-84cc-b9d680fe0a48_en?filename=georgia-report-2025.pdf

5. European Commission. (2025e). Montenegro 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/9ae69ea7-81d6-4d6a-a204-bd32a379d51d_en?filename=montenegro-report-2025.pdf

6. European Commission. (2025f). North Macedonia 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/267b368e-6b55-4a42-bb72-6395593de4da_en?filename=north-macedonia-report-2025.pdf

7. European Commission. (2025g). Republic of Moldova 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/23fa6af0-89b3-4532-a3d9-d1638727d14c_en?filename=moldova-report-2025.pdf

8. European Commission. (2025h). Serbia 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/6e68ce26-b95b-48e1-921a-c60c12da8f00_en?filename=serbia-report-2025.pdf

9. European Commission. (2025i). Türkiye 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/4bb4ddd1-4f20-4ee0-92db-926996ec8dd1_en?filename=t%C3%BCrkiye-report-2025.pdf

10. European Commission. (2025j). Ukraine 2025 report. European Commission. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/17115494-8122-4d10-8a06-2cf275eecde7_en?filename=ukraine-report-2025.pdf

11. Freedom House. (2025). Nations in transit 2025. https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit

12. Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2024). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators

13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Anti-corruption network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Annual report 2024. https://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/

14. Transparency International. (2025). Corruption perceptions index 2024: Results and trends. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024

15. Bidzilia, Yu. M. (2025). Derzhavna polityka informatsiinoi bezpeky v umovakh hibrydnykh zahroz [State policy of information security in the context of hybrid threats]. Ukrainskyi polityko-pravovyi dyskurs – Ukrainian Political and Legal Discourse, (17). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17757320 (in Ukrainian)

16. Bidzilia, Yu. M., Sharkan, V. V., & Tsviklinskyi, M. V. (2025). Mediapravo yak instrument zakhystu prav hromadian u borotbi z koruptsiieiu [Media law as a tool for protecting citizens’ rights in the fight against corruption]. Ukrainskyi polityko-pravovyi dyskurs – Ukrainian Political and Legal Discourse, (8). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14843295 (in Ukrainian)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Lyudmila Novoskoltseva