MANIPULATIVE ELECTORAL TECHNOLOGIES AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DISTORTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGIONAL POLICY
PDF

Keywords

Electoral technologies
manipulative electoral technologies
gerrymandering, regional policy
majoritarian electoral system
electoral constituency/electoral district

How to Cite

Dubel, M. (2026). MANIPULATIVE ELECTORAL TECHNOLOGIES AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DISTORTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGIONAL POLICY. Public Management and Policy, (4(20). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2026.4.04

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the specific features of the use of manipulative electoral technologies as a distorted instrument for the implementation of state regional policy. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that the phenomenon of gerrymandering is inherent in both stable, highly developed democratic states, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, and in developing ones. The selection of Malaysia and Ethiopia as case studies was determined by a combination of several factors, including their federal structure and the significant influence of ethnic minority factors within particular regions. The experience of Malaysia demonstrates that the combination of the first-past-the-post electoral system, ethnically structured electoral behavior, and the broad discretion of the Election Commission in the process of redistricting created favorable conditions for the development of both malapportionment and partisan as well as ethnic gerrymandering. Consecutive constitutional amendments effectively weakened restrictions concerning the equality of constituencies and provided the authorities with opportunities to influence the configuration of electoral maps in accordance with their own political interests. As a result, the electoral system, which formally was intended to ensure governmental stability and political competitiveness, for a long time contributed to preserving the dominance of the ruling coalition. At the same time, the example of the state of Johor demonstrates that the ethnic composition of the population and the territorial concentration of particular groups may become key instruments of electoral manipulation. No less illustrative is the example of the Harari Region in Ethiopia, where gerrymandering acquires a specific form by being combined with seat reservation mechanisms and special voting rights for ethnic minorities. On the one hand, such a model contributes to ensuring the political representation of the Harari people and creates mechanisms for protecting their right to self-determination. On the other hand, the excessive disproportionality between constituencies, the inequality of electoral power, and the actual dominance of particular ethno-political groups indicate a serious violation of the principle of equal suffrage. In this context, gerrymandering functions not only as an instrument of political representation, but also as a mechanism for consolidating ethnic politics and restricting political competition.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2026.4.04
PDF

References

1. Assefa, S. K. (2021). Comment: Legitimizing Gerrymandering in the Harari Regional State Contrary to the Principle of Equality of Votes. Mizan Law Review, 15(1), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v15i1.10

2. Avksentiev, A. O. (2015). Dzherrymenderynh yak praktyka elektoralnoho manipulyuvannya [Gerrymandering as a practice of electoral manipulating]. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Issues of Political Science, (28), 76–81. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/politology/article/download/5480/5022 (in Ukrainian)

3. Bickerstaff, S. (2020). Election Systems and Gerrymandering Worldwide. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30837-7_1

4. Canon, D. T. (2022). Race and redistricting. Annual Review of Political Science, (25), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102107

5. Chubatenko, O. M. (2020). Manipuliatyvni tekhnolohii u vyborchykh protsesakh Ukrainy [Manipulative technologies in the election processes of Ukraine]. Politykus, (4), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-9616.2020-4.9 (in Ukrainian)

6. Constitution of the regional state of Harari. (2016). Ethiopian Criminal Law Network. https://ethcln.com/node/144

7. Federal Constitution. (2026). Attorney General’s Chambers of Malaysia. https://lom.agc.gov.my/federal-constitution.php

8. Hrytsenko, O. S. (2020). Manipuliatyvni vplyvy v tekstakh media protiahom vyborchoi kampanii [Manipulative influences in media texts during the election campaign]. Obrii Drukarstva, 1(8), 52–61. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/obdr_2020_1_7 (in Ukrainian)

9. Hung, H. T. M. (2022). Electoral System Change for a More Democratic Malaysia? Challenges and Options. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. https://www.ukm.my/ikmas/publication/electoral-system-change-for-a-more-democratic-malaysia/

10. Jemaneh, T. H. (2025). Gerrymandering and extraterritorial voting right in Ethiopia: Accommodation or exclusion? (Publication No. 4452185) [Master’s thesis, University of the Western Cape]. UWC Research Repository. https://www.academicminority.net/en/page/gerrymandering-and-extraterritorial-voting-right-in-ethiopia

11. Kiiashko, Yu. (2019). Vykorystannia manipuliatyvnykh tekhnolohii u politychnykh lozunhakh vyborchykh bilbordiv [The use of manipulative technologies in the political slogans of election billboards]. In Materialy Somoi Mizhnarodnoi Naukovo-Metodychnoi Konferentsii “Suchasnyi Prostir Mediahramotnosti ta Perspektyvy Ioho Rozvytku” (pp. 401–408). Tsentr Vilnoi Presy; Akademiia Ukrainskoi Presy. https://www.aup.com.ua/uploads/Zbirnyk_conf_2019.pdf (in Ukrainian)

12. Madryha, T., & Bryndalskyi, A. (2024). Manipuliatyvni tekhnolohii pid chas vyborchoho protsesu yak zahroza politychnii bezpetsi [Manipulative technologies during the electoral process as a threat to political security]. Visnyk Prykarpatskoho Universytetu. Seriia: Politolohiia, (17), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-1815/2024-17-12 (in Ukrainian)

13. Martinez i Coma, F., & Lago, I. (2018). Gerrymandering in comparative perspective. Party Politics, 24(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816642806

14. Miyazaki, S., & Kasuya, Y. (2025). Malapportionment as a gerrymandering strategy: Exploring electoral manipulation in Malaysia using a simulation algorithm. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/g68x3_v2

15. Nazaruddin, M. I., & Yusoff, M. A. (2023). Electoral system reform in Malaysia: A delayed success? Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 31(4), 1383–1399. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.4.03

16. Nikolenko, Y. (2023). Terytorialna orhanizatsiia vyboriv yak skladova elektoralnoho inzhenerynhu [Territorial organization of elections as a component of electoral engineering]. Filosofiia ta Politolohiia v Konteksti Suchasnoi Kultury, 15(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.15421/352344 (in Ukrainian)

17. Ostwald, K. (2013). How to win a lost election: Malapportionment and Malaysia’s 2013 general election. The Round Table, 102(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2013.857146

18. Ostwald, K. (2017). Federalism without decentralization: Power consolidation in Malaysia. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 34(3), 488–506. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/683821/summary

19. Ostwald, K. (2019). Electoral boundaries in Malaysia’s 2018 election: Malapportionment, gerrymandering and UMNO’s fall. In E. T. Gomez & M. N. M. Osman (Eds.), Malaysia’s 14th General Election and UMNO’s Fall: Intra-Elite Feuding in the Pursuit of Power (pp. 86–110). Routledge. https://sppga.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2020/02/10.4324_9780429318375-5.pdf

20. Stenhach, N. (2025). Politychna poliaryzatsiia yak vyklyk dlia demokratii в suchasnykh Spoluchenykh Shtatakh [Political polarization as a challenge to democracy in the contemporary United States]. Universytetski Zapysky, 1(103), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.37491/UNZ.103.2 (in Ukrainian)

21. Steshenko, N. L., & Chosta, K. S. (2021). Manipuliatyvni tekhnolohii vyborchoi kampanii (na prykladi mistsevykh vyboriv u Kramatorskii terytorialnii hromadi 2020 roku) [Manipulative technologies of the election campaign (on the example of local elections in the Kramatorsk territorial community of 2020)]. Rehionalni Studii, (26), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2021.26.4 (in Ukrainian)

22. Wong, C. H. (2018). Constituency delimitation and electoral authoritarianism in Malaysia. The Round Table, 107(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2018.1424075

23. Wong, C. H., Chin, J., & Othman, N. (2010). Malaysia – towards a topology of an electoral one-party state. Democratization, 17(5), 920–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2010.501179

24. Yimenu, B. (2024). Continuities and changes in electoral authoritarianism: Evidence from Ethiopia. Regional and Federal Studies, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2024.2315491

25. Zeleke, S. A., Mazengia, M. A., & Yigzaw, T. D. (2026). Minority dominance over the majority in Ethiopia: A political plot in the Harari Regional State. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 1(aop), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10259

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Mykhaylo Dubel