INTEROPERABLE GOVERNANCE UNDER CONDITIONS OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND CRISIS CONSTRAINTS
PDF

Keywords

interoperability
interoperable governance
digital transformation
institutional resilience
crisis constraints
adaptive-combined model

How to Cite

Kurnosenko, L. (2026). INTEROPERABLE GOVERNANCE UNDER CONDITIONS OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND CRISIS CONSTRAINTS. Public Management and Policy, (2(18). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2026.2.14

Abstract

The article examines interoperability as a fundamental principle of public governance under conditions of digital transformation and crisis constraints. The deepening of European integration processes drives the relevance of the topic, the growing complexity of governance interactions, and the need to ensure institutional resilience of the state amid wartime and socio-economic challenges. The purpose of the study is to provide a theoretical substantiation of interoperable governance as an integral architecture of public authority coordination and to determine the prospects for developing an adaptive-combined model for Ukraine. The research employs systemic, institutional, and comparative approaches, as well as methods of conceptual analysis, structural-functional modeling, and content analysis of regulatory documents of the European Union and Ukraine. The multidimensional structure of interoperability is revealed, encompassing political, legal, organizational, semantic, and technical levels of interaction. National interoperability frameworks of EU countries are analyzed and typologized into centralized, decentralized, transitional, and point-to-point interaction models. It is substantiated that the choice of architectural model determines the parameters of institutional resilience, governability, and resource efficiency. The current state of interoperability development in Ukraine is assessed, particularly in the fields of digital services, healthcare, and public finance, and the regulatory preconditions for its institutionalization are examined. An adaptive-combined model of interoperable governance is proposed, combining a centralized coordination contour with decentralized management of sectoral registries. The conclusions demonstrate that interoperability functions not merely as a technological instrument but as a strategic principle of organizing public authority, capable of enhancing policy coherence, reducing governance losses, and strengthening state resilience under conditions of crisis complexity. Further research should focus on developing methodologies for assessing interoperability as an indicator of governance quality and institutional maturity of public authorities.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2026.2.14
PDF

References

1. BELGIF. (n.d.). Belgian Federal Public Service Policy and Support. BELGIF – Belgian Interoperability Framework. https://www.belgif.be/index.en.html

2. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2025). Order No. 854-r, On Approval of the Action Plan for Enhancing the Interoperability of Information Systems. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/854-2025-%D1%80#Text

3. Campmas, A., Iacob, N., & Simonelli, F. (2022). How can interoperability stimulate the use of digital public services? An analysis of national interoperability frameworks and e-Government in the European Union. Data & Policy, (4), e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.11

4. Danish Agency for Digitisation. (n.d.). The OIO Framework: The EA Framework Designed for the Danish Public Sector. https://coherencyarchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/005_the_oio-framework.pdf

5. De Martino, M., Martirano, G., Quarati, A., Varni, F., & Toscano Domínguez, M. (2025). Digital transformation and location data interoperability skills for small and medium enterprises. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14020051

6. eCH Association. (n.d.). eCH Standards overview. eCH Association. https://www.ech.ch/de/standard-uebersicht

7. e-Estonia. (n.d.). X-Road: Interoperability services. e-Estonia. https://e-estonia.com/solutions/interoperability-services/x-road/

8. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2024). Monitoring the Interoperable Europe Act: A proposal for a monitoring framework. Interoperable Europe Portal. https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/iopeu-monitoring

9. European Commission. (2015). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1501 of 8 September 2015 on the interoperability framework pursuant to Article 12(8) of Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_001-15#Text

10. European Commission. (2025). Digital Public Administration Factsheets 2025. Interoperable Europe Portal. https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/iopeu-monitoring/digital-public-administration-factsheets-2025

11. European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/903 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2024 laying down measures for a high level of interoperability of the public sector across the Union (Interoperable Europe Act). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/903/oj

12. Federal Ministry for Digital Transformation and Government Modernisation. (n.d.). Digitale Verwaltung – Federal IT architecture and digital administration framework. Federal Ministry for Digital Transformation and Government Modernisation. https://www.digitale-verwaltung.de/Webs/DV/DE/startseite/startseite-node.html

13. Filipova, N., Mykhailovska, O., & Kolotov, M. (2025). Analysis of the architecture of the electronic health care system and the main problems of interoperability. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 346(5), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-346-5-1

14. Interoperable Europe Portal. (n.d.). Dutch Governmental Reference Architecture (NORA). Interoperable Europe Portal. https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/iopeu-monitoring/solution/european-interoperability-framework-eif-toolbox/dutch-governmental-reference-architecture-nora

15. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

16. Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine. (2025). Order No. 984, On Approval of the Technical Requirements for Automated Fare Collection Systems Ensuring Interoperability of Electronic Ticket Registration Means. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1060-25#Text

17. Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. (2013). Order No. 2563/5/645, On Approval of the List of International and European Standards and Other Technical Regulation Acts for Harmonization Aimed at Reforming, Developing, and Ensuring Interoperability of the Electronic Digital Signature System. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v2563323-13?lang=uk#Text

18. Osmak, A., Karpenko, Y., & Kachmarskyi, Y. (2024). Interoperability of criteria for evaluating disinformation detection services in the conditions of public administration digitalization. Public Administration Aspects, 12(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.15421/152401

19. Pakhomova, T. I., Mamontova, E. V., Tsedik, M. H., Kurnosenko, L. V., & Kucheriava, K. Y. (2024). Developing a system for assessing the activities of public administration bodies in public relations. Salud, Ciencia Y Tecnología - Serie De Conferencias, (3), 764. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.764

20. Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., & Burke, G. B. (2012). E-Government interoperability: Interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions: Interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310392184

21. République française. (n.d.). Référentiel général d’interopérabilité (RGI). République française. https://www.numerique.gouv.fr/offre-accompagnement/reference-interoperabilite-rgi/

22. Scholl (Jochen), H. J., & Klischewski, R. (2007). E-Government integration and interoperability: Framing the research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(8–9), 889–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701402668

23. United Kingdom Government. (n.d.). Technology Code of Practice. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-technology-code-of-practice

24. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2025). Resolution No. 4724-IX, On the Adoption as a Basis of the Draft Law of Ukraine on the Safety and Interoperability of Railway Transport of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4724-20#Text

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Larysa Kurnosenko