Abstract
The article provides a theoretical and applied interpretation of the essence of public governance in the healthcare sector through the substantiation of its goals and functions as interrelated elements of a coherent public policy system. The authors emphasize that the complexity of organizing the work lies in the need to coordinate and simultaneously work with medical care, prevention, social determinants, behavioral and psychological factors, as well as with the data obtained and the institutional capacity of the system. International WHO documents were used to clarify the content of the categories “health”, “primary health care” and “health promotion” as basic semantic guidelines. It is argued that the essence of public governance in healthcare is determined by the dual nature of this domain, where the authoritative role of the state as a guarantor of rights, standards and patient safety is combined with a service-oriented logic focused on human needs and measurable outcomes of public decisions. The goals of public governance in healthcare are interpreted as multidimensional priorities covering the implementation of the right to health, equitable access to services, improvement of quality and patient safety, financial sustainability, institutional capacity, and resilience to crises in the context of war-related and pandemic risks. Based on a synthesis of scholarly approaches, an integrated functional model of healthcare governance is proposed, comprising regulatory and legal, institutional and organizational, strategic, financial and economic, information and analytical, quality and patient safety, preventive and public health, crisis and adaptive, as well as communicative and partnership functions. The article demonstrates that governance effectiveness depends not on declarative goal-setting but on functional decomposition of goals, availability of instruments and enforceable accountability; digital transformation should be treated as a foundation for governability and transparency, while partnerships with communities and non-state actors are a prerequisite for policy legitimacy and system resilience. The conclusion substantiates that an integrated view of the essence, goals and functions of public governance in healthcare provides a conceptual basis for consistent reforms capable of ensuring social equity, high-quality services and crisis readiness.
References
1. Anishchenko, M. A. (2023). The field of health protection as an object of public administration. Public Management and Administration in Ukraine, (34), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.32782/pma2663-5240-2023.34.5
2. Babiak, O. (2023). Determination of theoretical basis and principles of the state management of health care. Investments: practice and experience, (13), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2023.13.109
3. Barzylovych, A. (2020). Financial mechanism of state regulation of healthcare development in Ukraine. State Administration: Improvement and Development, (3), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.32689/2618-0065-20203(5)-34-47
4. Buryk, Z., Andrieiev, I., & Buryk, M. (2025). The public health governance in ukraine: constitutional foundations, structure, and practical implementation. Public Management and Policy, 12(16). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.12.03
5. Byshenko, G. (2024). Principles of government policy in the implementation of electronic health care in Ukraine. Investments: practice and experience, (6), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2024.6.262
6. Dakal, A. (2025). National health as a core function of the public administration system in the healthcare sector: theoretical, methodological, and conceptual approaches. Scientific Perspectives, 10(64), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2025-10(64)-143-155
7. Havrychenko, D., Коzyrieva, O., Popova, T., & Sergiienko, L. (2022). Mechanism of financing of healthcare of Ukraine in transformation conditions. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(42), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.42.2022.3674
8. Khanina, O. (2023). Essence and methodological functions of the science of state health care management. Investments: practice and experience, (22), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2023.22.197
9. Kozachenko, G. V., & Solohub, O. V. (2024). The Mechanisms of public administration in the healthcare sector in Ukraine: Current state and system creation. BusinessInform, (2), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-2-36-46
10. Mazur, Yu., & Zhabko, Ye. (2025). Principles and models of state management of healthcare. Current Issues in Modern Science, 4(34), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2025-4(34)-321-329
11. Mеlnychenko, O. A., & Ovcharova, Zh. M. (2022). Public management of health care development as a subject of scientific research. Таuridа Scientific Herald. Series: Public Management and Administration, (4), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.32851/tnv-pub.2022.4.5
12. Venger, I. (2024). Assessment of the effectiveness of public management mechanisms in the development of healthcare institutions in Ukraine: challenges and prospects. State and Regions. Series: Public Management and Administration, (1), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-3401.2024.1.35
13. WHO. (1948). Constitution of the World Health Organization. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution
14. WHO. (1986). The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/first-global-conference
15. WHO. (2019). Declaration of Alma-Ata. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/declaration-of-alma-ata
16. Zakharov, S. (2025). State regulation of the health care system: content, principles and tools. Scientific Perspectives, 11(65), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2025-11(65)-198-208

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Oleksandr Radchenko, Аllа Dakal
