Keywords
investment
industry
military aggression
destruction
international cooperation
losses
How to Cite
Abstract
Full-scale military aggression against Ukraine has led to widespread destruction of industrial and critical infrastructure, causing profound economic and geopolitical consequences. The damage affects key sectors such as energy, metallurgy, machine building, and logistics. The destruction of production chains and energy systems complicates international cooperation, reduces the flow of foreign direct investment, and increases risks for business. The purpose of this article is to systematize the impact of industrial infrastructure destruction on international cooperation and investment attractiveness, analyze the mechanisms of influence, and offer recommendations to mitigate the negative consequences. The study uses methods such as content analysis and synthesis of secondary data, as well as logical and economic analysis of channels of influence (physical, financial, reputational, and institutional mechanisms). Public estimates of direct losses are used for quantitative illustration. In these conditions, the study of the mechanisms of the impact of destruction on international cooperation and the investment attractiveness of Ukraine is particularly relevant for the development of recovery policies and the formation of new economic development strategies. The analysis showed that the destruction of industrial infrastructure has a systemic impact on the economy through financial, institutional, and political-security channels. Increased risks and reduced confidence among foreign partners have temporarily limited investment flows. Direct losses in the energy sector (USD 14.6 billion), the metallurgical complex (USD 4.346 million), and the machine-building sector (USD 1.183 billion) were assessed. The impact of the destruction of industrial and critical infrastructure on the country’s investment attractiveness has been studied. The dynamics of investment volumes were analyzed. Directions for minimizing the consequences of the destruction of industrial infrastructure and increasing Ukraine’s investment attractiveness were proposed: financial and investment instruments, restoration of critical infrastructure nodes, institutional and legal reforms, and innovative and “green” approaches. It has been established that the destruction of industrial infrastructure, despite significant short-term losses, can become a catalyst for long-term structural transformation of Ukraine’s economy. Effective implementation of recovery mechanisms – through institutional reforms, reconstruction of critical facilities, increased transparency, and stimulation of private investment – will not only restore lost potential but also strengthen international cooperation and increase the country’s investment attractiveness and competitiveness in the post-conflict period.
References
1. Abdullaieva, A., Danyliuk, V., & Mazur, D. (2025). Perspektyvy investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti Ukrainy v umovakh voiennoho stanu ta pisliavoiennoho vidnovlennia [Prospects for Ukraine’s investment attractiveness under martial law and post-war recovery]. Economy and Society, (72). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-72-44 (in Ukrainian)
2. Antonenko, V., Liashok, Ya., Popova, O., Katranzhy, L., & Liashok, N. (2024). Investytsiina pryvablyvist Ukrainy v konteksti yii pisliavoiennoho vidnovlennia [Ukraine’s investment attractiveness in the context of its post-war recovery]. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(57), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.57.2024.4410 (in Ukrainian)
3. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2024). Transition Report 2024–25 — Ukraine (Country assessment). https://www.ebrd.com/content/dam/ebrd_dxp/assets/pdfs/office-of-the-chief-economist/transition-report-2024/country-assessments-2023-24/eastern-europe-and-the-caucasus/Transition-Report-2024-25-Ukraine.pdf
4. Kyiv School of Economics Institute. (2025, February). Zvit pro priami zbytkiv infrastruktury, nepriami vtraty ta potreby u vidnovlenni (2022–2024) [Report on direct infrastructure damages, indirect losses and recovery needs (2022–2024)]. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/KSE_Damages_Report-November-2024-UA.pdf (in Ukrainian)
5. Magomedov, A. O. (2023). Analiz vtrat ta ruinuvan infrastruktury Ukrainy, shcho pidliahaie vidnovlenniu [Analysis of losses and destruction of the infrastructure of Ukraine subject to restoration]. Tavriiskyi Naukovyi Visnyk. Seriia: Publichne Upravlinnia ta Administruvannia, (6), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.32782/tnv-pub.2023.6.9 (in Ukrainian)
6. Markushyn, O. (2024). Mizhnarodna spivpratsia yak kliuchovyi instrument zaluchennia investytsii u budivnytstvo ta rozvytok obiektiv miskoi infrastruktury [International cooperation as a key tool for attracting investments in the construction and development of urban infrastructure facilities]. Problems of Modern Transformations. Series: Law, Public Management, and Administration, (11). https://doi.org/10.54929/2786-5746-2024-11-02-10 (in Ukrainian)
7. Myhal, O. F., Dudarev, O. O., Protsiak, A. I., & Shevchuk, Yu. V. (2025). Investytsiinyi potentsial Ukrainy pislia viiny v konteksti yevropeiskoi intehratsii [Investment potential of Ukraine after the war in the context of European integration]. Innovatsiina Ekonomika, (1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2025.1.14 (in Ukrainian)
8. National Bank of Ukraine. (n.d.). Zovnishnii sektor statystyky [External sector statistics]. https://bank.gov.ua/ua/statistic/sector-external#5 (in Ukrainian)
9. Slavkova, A., & Kolisnyk, D. (2023). Investytsiina pryvablyvist Ukrainy: Realii v umovakh viiny ta perspektyvy pisliavoiennoi vidbudovy [Investment attractiveness of Ukraine: Realities in the context of war and prospects for post-war reconstruction]. Economy and Society, (56). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-56-138 (in Ukrainian)
10. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Inozemni investytsii [Foreign investments]. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/menu/menu_u/ioz_19.htm (in Ukrainian)
11. U.S. Department of State. (2024). 2024 Investment Climate Statements: Ukraine. https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-investment-climate-statements/ukraine
12. UkraineInvest. (n.d.). Ukraine investment climate is improving: 70% of surveyed companies plan to invest in Ukraine despite the war. https://ukraineinvest.gov.ua/en/news/ukraines-investment-climate-is-improving-70-of-surveyed-companies-plan-to-invest-in-ukraine-despite-the-war/
13. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2024). Industrial recovery publications and resources. https://www.unido.org/green-recovery-vision-ukraine/publications-and-resources
14. Vankovych, L. Ya., & Yamshchikov, I. I. (2023). Doslidzhennia vplyvu povnomasshtabnoho vtorhnennia na ekonomichni pokaznyky enerhetychnoi haluzi Ukrainy [Investigation of the influence of full-scale invasion on economical metrics of the energy industry of Ukraine]. Academic Visions, (21). https://academy-vision.org/index.php/av/article/download/457/426/430 (in Ukrainian)
15. World Bank. (2025, February). Ukraine – Fourth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA4): February 2022 – December 2024. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099022025114040022/pdf/P180174-ca39eccd-ea67-4bd8-b537-ff73a675a0a8.pdf
16. Zatonatskyi, D., & Lieonov, S. (2024). Prohresyvni praktyky realizatsii proektiv derzhavno-pryvatnoho partnerstva v krytychnii infrastrukturi [Progressive practices of implementing public-private partnership projects in critical infrastructure]. Socio-Economic Relations in the Digital Society, 1(51), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.1.51.2024.554 (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Viktoriia Zahorna, Dmytro Bidiuk