Abstract
In the post-war period, strategic planning for the reconstruction of territorial communities in Ukraine requires not only infrastructure and financial decisions, but also the mobilization of internal social resources. One of the key such resources is social capital, which ensures trust, cohesion, residents' participation in decision-making, and the community's ability to self-organize. The purpose of the study is to identify the role of social capital in the process of strategic planning for the post-war reconstruction of territorial communities in Ukraine. The methodological basis was: a structural-functional approach, a case method (for analyzing cooperation practices between communities, volunteers, business, and non-governmental organizations), content analysis (of scientific literature and sociological surveys), as well as elements of secondary data analysis (in particular, statistics of trust in government from KIIS research, analytical reports of the Renaissance Foundation and other institutions for 2022–202). The focus is on territorial communities in the southern and central regions of Ukraine that participated in reconstruction initiatives. The article analyzes modern ideas about social capital based on scientific works. The statistics of trust in different levels of government for 2022–2023 are analyzed (KIIS), which shows the stability of high trust in local self-government compared to the government and parliament. It is found that social capital is not a permanent given, but is formed through the experience of collective action and trust in local institutions. Based on practical cases from Mykolaiv, Kherson, Vinnytsia regions, etc., three key types of interaction are described: community partnership with NGOs in strategic planning, volunteer movements as a tool for reconstruction and unity, as well as private-public initiatives from business. It is established that involving citizens in decision-making and public discussion contributes to maintaining trust in government even in crisis conditions. An original interpretation of social capital as a critical resource for forming strategic decisions of communities in the post-war period is proposed. For the first time, examples of local horizontal networks in the context of reconstruction have been systematically analyzed, including their impact on institutional sustainability, expanding residents' participation in public governance, and increasing trust in government.
References
1. Rakhunkova palata Ukrainy. (2023). Audit vidbudovy hromad: bilsha chastyna subventsii na vidnovlennia sotsialnoi ta krytychnoi infrastruktury u 2023 rotsi ne bula vykorystana [Audit of community reconstruction: most of the subsidy for the restoration of social and critical infrastructure in 2023 was not used]. https://rp.gov.ua/PressCenter/News/?id=2276 (in Ukrainian)
2. Rubryka. (2023). Vidnovlennia pid chas viiny: yak hromady buduiut novu Ukrainu [Recovery during war: how communities are building a new Ukraine]. https://rubryka.com/2023/10/24/vidnovlennya-pid-chas-vijny/ (in Ukrainian)
3. Rating Group Ukraina. (2023). Nevidymyi klei: doslidzhennia sotsialnoho kapitalu v Ukraini [Invisible glue: social capital research in Ukraine]. https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/nevidimiy_kley_doslidzhennya_socialnogo_kapitalu_v_ukraini.html (in Ukrainian)
4. Sobor.com.ua. (2024). Dovira do Tserkvy v Ukraini zrostae, ale zalyshaetsia nyzhchoiu za doviru do volonteriv – opytuvannia [Trust in the Church in Ukraine is growing but remains lower than trust in volunteers – survey]. https://sobor.com.ua/news/opituvannya-24 (in Ukrainian)
5. HURT. (2025). Stratehiia rozvytku hromad pid chas viiny [Community development strategy during wartime]. https://gurt.org.ua/news/informator/105857/ (in Ukrainian)
6. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243
7. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
8. Revko, A. (2022). Sotsialnyi kapital yak determinantа rozvytku hromady ta sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva v umovakh suchasnykh vyklykiv [Social capital as a determinant of community development and social entrepreneurship under current challenges]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (43). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-43-61 (in Ukrainian)
9. Diakonenko, O. (2023). Sotsialnyi kapital terytorialnykh hromad Ukrainy v umovakh viiny: suchasni transformatsii ta prohnozni zrushennia [Social capital of Ukrainian territorial communities in wartime: current transformations and forecasted shifts]. Demohrafiia ta sotsialna ekonomika, 52(2), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2023.02.054 (in Ukrainian)
10. Arends, H., Brik, T., Herrmann, B., & Roesel, F. (2023). Decentralization and trust in government: Quasi-experimental evidence from Ukraine. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(4), 1356–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.08.002
11. Patytska, Kh. O. (2022). Sotsialnyi kapital yak chynnyk staloho rozvytku terytorialnykh hromad: povedinkovyi aspekt [Social capital as a factor of sustainable development of territorial communities: behavioral aspect]. Sotsialno ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrainy, (153), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2022-1-3 (in Ukrainian)
12. Zaiats, T. A., & Kraievska, H. O. (2020). Rozvytok sotsialnoho kapitalu terytorialnykh hromad v Ukraini [Social capital development of territorial communities in Ukraine]. Economy of Ukraine, 63(12 (709), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.12.056 (in Ukrainian)
13. Zvonar, V. P. (2021). Dzherela ta pryntsypy rozvytku sotsialnoho kapitalu [Sources and principles of social capital development]. Economy of Ukraine, 64(1 (710), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.01.024 (in Ukrainian)
14. Huba, M. I. (2021). Sotsialnyi kapital yak chynnyk rozvytku hromad [Social capital as a factor in community development]. Taviiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia, (1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.32851/tnv-pub.2021.1.3 (in Ukrainian)
15. Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2012). How trust matters: The changing political relevance of political trust. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 312–325. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23187102
16. Bjørnskov, C. (2019). Civic honesty and cultures of trust. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434957
17. Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon & Schuster. https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=en&lr=&id=j0LC6XZtH84C
18. VoxUkraine. (2024). Vidkrytist chy dopomoha armii? Shcho vplyvaie na doviru do mistsevoi vlady [Openness or military aid? What affects trust in local government]. https://voxukraine.org/vidkrytist-chy-dopomoga-armiyi-shho-vplyvaye-na-doviru-do-mistsevoyi-vlady (in Ukrainian)
19. International Renaissance Foundation. (2024). Prezentatsiia napriamu “Sotsialnyi kapital”: klyuchovi orientyry prohramy [Social capital program orientation presentation]. https://www.irf.ua/social-capital-presentation/ (in Ukrainian)
20. Kiivskyi mizhnarodnyi instytut sotsiolohii (KMIS). (2023). Dynamika spryiannia napriamku sprav v Ukraini ta dovira do vlady: monitoring [Dynamics of perception of the course of affairs in Ukraine and trust in government: Monitoring]. https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1321&page=1 (in Ukrainian)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Volodymyr Syzon
