ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF GEOPOLITICAL TENSION ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

armed conflicts
economic sanctions
hybrid warfare
disinformation
global governance
security architecture

How to Cite

Kuz, O., Babina, V., & Nepochatov, D. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF GEOPOLITICAL TENSION ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. Public Management and Policy, (5(9). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.5.06

Abstract

The article examines current social policy issues within Ukraine's public administration system, focusing on the context of decentralization and ensuring equal access to social services for all population groups. The relevance of the research is driven by the need to adapt social policy to new challenges. Key problems identified include socio-economic instability and the consequences of the war. The objective is to identify the main problems and factors affecting the effectiveness of social services delivery. The research aims to find ways to improve social policy at the regional level. The study employs methods such as comparative analysis, statistical review, index-based approach, and social service efficiency evaluation methodology. A comparative analysis of countries like Sweden, Germany, France, and Estonia revealed effective approaches to organizing social policy, with their practices partially applicable in today’s Ukraine. The research results indicate that decentralization has expanded the financial and organizational autonomy of local communities. The war’s impact has been significant, leading to reduced institutional capacity of authorities, the destruction of social infrastructure, and workforce shortages. The article proposes a conceptual model for assessing equal access to social services, which includes five key components: social capital, economic potential, infrastructure, governance level, and digital capabilities. This model enables the evaluation of access to social services based on objective indicators while accounting for regional specificities. The practical application of this model will help identify strengths and weaknesses in social policy at the local level and determine priority areas for future development. The conclusions emphasize that improving the mechanisms of financing, organizing, and monitoring social service delivery is a crucial task today. A key consideration is the specific characteristics of each region and the contemporary challenges it faces. Future research prospects include developing new approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of social services. Additionally, future studies should focus on examining the impact of digitalization on access to social services and integrating international experience to enhance the resilience of Ukraine’s social system.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.5.06
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Buriachenko, O. V. (2024). Bezpekovi vyklyky heopolityky XXI stolittia: vektory ta priorytety polityky bezpeky [Security challenges of 21st-century geopolitics: Vectors and priorities of security policy]. Politikus – Politicus, (3), 157–163. http://politicus.od.ua/3_2024/26.pdf (in Ukrainian).

2. Loza, V., & Onofriichuk, I. (2024). Informatsiina bezpeka ta hibrydna viina v konteksti globalnykh ta natsionalnykh interesiv [Information security and hybrid warfare in the context of global and national interests]. In Obrazy suchasnosti v humanitarnomu znanni [Images of modernity in humanitarian knowledge] (pp. 355–359). Kyiv. https://ur.knute.edu.ua/collections/23c7ba62-6a50-49c5-a5ff-161f8f1d51c6 (in Ukrainian).

3. Pankovets, M. P., & Shevchuk, T. V. (2024). Mizhnarodni ekonomichni sanktsii v systemi mizhnarodnoi bezpeky: dosvid ta efektyvnist zastosuvannia v suchasnykh umovakh [International economic sanctions in the system of international security: experience and effectiveness of application in modern conditions]. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 34(4), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.36930/4034040 (in Ukrainian).

4. Kravchuk, N., & Badiuk, H. (2023). Heopolitychni ta heoekonomichni naslidky suchasnykh mizhnarodnykh zbroinykh konfliktiv [Geopolitical and geoeconomic consequences of modern international armed conflicts]. Visnyk ekonomiky – Economic Herald, (4), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2023.04.052 (in Ukrainian).

5. Loza, V., Myronenko, V., Myronenko, P., Smolianiuk, V., & Chelak, O. (2024). The escalation of military threats as a reality of modern geopolitics. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, (6), 2024ss0223. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0223

6. Muya, J. (2024). Geopolitical fragmentation in the world and its consequences on developing countries: A game of chess on a fractured board. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), 122708. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/122708/1/MPRA_paper_122708.pdf

7. World Economic Forum. (2025). Global Risks Report 2025. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025

8. Denysov, V. M. (2007). Viina. Zbroinyi konflikt mizhnarodnoho kharakteru [War. Armed conflict of an international character]. In Yu. S. Shemchushenko (Ed.), Velykyi entsyklopedychnyi yurydychnyi slovnyk [Great encyclopedic legal dictionary] (pp. 293–294). Kyiv (in Ukrainian).

9. Department of Peace and Conflict Research (2025). UCDP – Uppsala Conflict Data Program. Department of Peace and Conflict Research. https://ucdp.uu.se

10. International Crisis Group: Official Website. (2025). https://www.crisisgroup.org

11. Atlantic Council. (2024). Annual Report 2023/2024. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/2023-annual-report

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Oleh Kuz, Valentyna Babina, Danylo Nepochatov