COOPERATION BETWEEN THE EU AND GEORGIA IN LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT REFORM: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

local self-government
decentralization
Georgia
EU
local self-government reform
Eastern Partnership
Associated Trio

How to Cite

Fedirko, B. (2025). COOPERATION BETWEEN THE EU AND GEORGIA IN LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT REFORM: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS. Public Management and Policy, (3(7). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.3.03

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the European Union on the local self-government reform process in Georgia, assess the effectiveness of the changes implemented, identify the main problems and challenges faced by local authorities during the reform process, and determine the role of the EU in this process. Specifically, the study aims to identify the influence of external and internal factors on the success of the reforms, the role of international support, and evaluate the prospects and opportunities for further development of local self-government reforms in Georgia.      The research employs several methods to investigate the EU’s impact on local self-government reform in Georgia. The systems approach allows for examining the reforms as part of the broader local governance system, including the interaction between national and local authorities, the EU, civil society, and international partners. Content analysis focuses on studying publications in the media, reports, and official statements to uncover key trends and approaches in public discourses. The analysis method investigates the interaction between Georgia and the EU to understand the cooperation mechanisms and the role of various stakeholders in implementing the reforms. The article examines key features of the decentralization process and the reform of the local self-government system in Georgia, analyzing the stages and outcomes of the changes made. It highlights the areas of cooperation between Georgia and the European Union within the framework of decentralization transformations, as well as outlines the primary EU influence tools on the development of the local self-government system. Particular attention is given to both external and internal challenges that arise during such interactions. Recommendations are proposed to enhance the effectiveness of the reforms and bring the Georgian local self-government system closer to European standards.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.3.03
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Vorona, P. (2013). Vybory do orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia Hruzii – demokratyzatsiia chy tsentralizatsiia? [Elections to the local self-government bodies of Georgia – democratization or centralization?]. Publichne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka – Public Administration: Theory and Practice, (3), 66–71. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pubupr_2013_1_13 (in Ukraine)

2. Turchyn, Y., Ivasechko, O., Tsebenko, O., Sukhorolska, I., & Roslon, D. (2022). Perspektyvy rozvytku initsiatyvy YeS “Skhidne partnerstvo” v umovakh heopolitychnykh vyklykiv [Prospects for the development of the EU’s “Eastern Partnership” initiative in the context of geopolitical challenges]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo “Lvivskoi politekhniky”. (in Ukraine)

3. Chichinadze, B. (2020). Characteristics of local self-government development in Georgia. Food Industry Economics, 12(3), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.15673/fie.v12i3.1820

4. Jgenti, M. (2016). Needs analysis on decentralisation and local government in Georgia. Partnership for Good Governance. https://rm.coe.int/090000168078af7c

5. Jibuti, M., & Melua, D. (2023). The European perspective of local self-government in Georgia (political economy aspects). Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences, 17(3), 121–127. http://science.org.ge/bnas/t17-n3/20_Jibuti_Economics.pdf

6. Kandelaki, K., Losaberidze, D., Melashvili, I., & Shergelashvili, T. (2012). Expanded concept of the local self-government system of Georgia. Development Research Institute of Georgia, (2), 85. https://bit.ly/3WdO3Zs

7. Melua, D. (2021). Decentralisation and local public administration reform in Georgia. NALAS & PLATFORMA in cooperation with NALAG. https://platforma-dev.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Status-Report-Decentralisation-and-Local-Public-Administration-Reform-in-Georgia.pdf

8. Skorupska, A., & Zasztowt, K. (2014). Georgia’s local government reform: How to escape from the Soviet past. PISM, 4(87), 6. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/177215/PISM%20Policy%20Paper%20no%204%20(87).pdf

9. Council of Europe, Congress of Local and Regional Authorities. (2017). European Charter of Local Self-Government. https://rm.coe.int/-pdf-a6-59-pages/168071a536

10. Government of Georgia. (2014). Local Self-Government Code: Organic Law of Georgia. https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/download/2244429/15/en/pdf

11. European Union, European Atomic Energy Community, & Government of Georgia. (2014). Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part. https://surl.li/thnvaq

12. European Commission. (2019). Commission Implementing Decision on the Annual Action Programme 2019 in favour of Georgia: Action Document for EU4Georgia Integrated Territorial Development. https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-11/annex2_eu4integrated_territorial_development.pdf

13. European Commission. (2022). Evaluation of the EU’s cooperation with Georgia: Final report. Public administration reform, incl. public financial management. https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-10/GEO%20CSE%20-%20Final%20Report%20-%20September%202022.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Bohdan Fedirko