THE ROLE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM OF POST-SOCIALIST STATES
PDF

Keywords

anti-corruption policy
national security
public administration
public trust
Eastern Europe

How to Cite

Dubel, M. (2026). THE ROLE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM OF POST-SOCIALIST STATES. Philosophy and Governance, (5(21). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2026.5.03

Abstract

The article examines the role of anti-corruption policy within the national security systems of Southeast European states, using the cases of Romania, Croatia, and Bulgaria. The relevance of the study is determined by the transformation of perceptions of corruption in contemporary states, where it is increasingly viewed not only as a legal or economic problem but also as a factor affecting the effectiveness of public administration, political stability, and institutional resilience. This issue has become particularly significant in the context of contemporary security challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, growing geopolitical instability, and the full-scale Russian-Ukrainian war. The purpose of the study is to determine the place and role of anti-corruption policy in ensuring the national security of post-socialist states. The research analyses the specific features of the formation and development of anti-corruption policies in Romania, Croatia, and Bulgaria from the beginning of post-socialist transformations to the present day. It was established that in all three countries, the spread of corruption was closely linked to processes of economic liberalisation, privatisation, and the institutional weakness of the state apparatus during the transition period. The study identifies European integration processes and the European Union’s requirements regarding the rule of law as important drivers of anti-corruption reforms. The findings demonstrate that Romania achieved the most notable results through the activities of the National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA) and the strengthening of the independence of specialised anti-corruption institutions. In Croatia, a key role was played by the activities of the Office for the Suppression of Corruption and Organised Crime (USKOK) and the adaptation of public policies to European standards. The Bulgarian experience illustrates the difficulties of combating systemic corruption in the context of persistent political patronage networks and state capture practices. The study concludes that all three countries have experienced a gradual expansion in the understanding of corruption—from a criminal justice issue to a complex threat to national security. Corruption is increasingly perceived as a factor influencing political stability, the quality of governance, public trust, and the state’s capacity to respond effectively to internal and external challenges. The experiences of Romania, Croatia, and Bulgaria demonstrate that effective anti-corruption policy constitutes an essential component of state resilience and national security under contemporary conditions.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2026.5.03
PDF

References

1. Fazekas, M., Poltoratskaia, V., & Tóth, B. (2023). Corruption Risks and State Capture in Bulgarian Public Procurement. Policy Research Working Papers. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10444

2. Grubiša, D. (2010). Anti-corruption policy in Croatia: Benchmark for EU accession. Politička misao, 47(05), 69–95. https://eu.boell.org/sites/default/files/uploads/2013/12/anti-corruption_croatia.pdf

3. Hzhybovska, T. S. (2019). Antykoruptsiina polityka v krainakh Skhidnoi Yevropy: dosvid dlia Ukrainy [Anti-corruption policy in the countries of Eastern Europe: experience for Ukraine]. Visnyk Mariupolskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Istoriia. Politolohiia – Visnyk of Mariupol State University. Series: History. Political Science, (25), 84–94. http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/5489/1/Gzhybovska.pdf (in Ukrainian)

4. Lipych, L. H., Rublov, V. V., Khilukha, O. A., & Kushnir, M. A. (2022). Shliakhy rozvytku antykoruptsiinoi polityky v Ukraini kriz pryzmu nauky publichnoho menedzhmentu [Ways of developing anti-corruption policy in Ukraine through the prism of public management science]. Naukovi zapysky Lvivskoho universytetu biznesu ta prava – Naukovi zapysky Lvivskoho universytetu biznesu ta prava, (34), 53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7089973 (in Ukrainian)

5. Maleš, M. (2024). Politička korupcija – ugroza nacionalne sigurnosti Republike Hrvatske. Polemos, XXVII(53), 139–154. https://hrcak.srce.hr/323294

6. Meqdadi, L. (2023). The Fight Against Corruption in Romania: Struggles to Adhere to the Rule of Law and the (De)Legitimization of the ACA. MacEwan University Student EJournal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31542/g1x04b64

7. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2016). The quest for good governance: Learning from virtuous circles. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 95–109. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-quest-for-good-governance-learning-from-virtuous-circles/

8. Myloserdna, I. (2020). Antykoruptsiina polityka: mizhnarodni standarty ta dosvid krain skhidnoi Yevropy [Anti-corruption policy: international standards and experience of Eastern European countries]. Politychne zhyttia – Political crisis, (4), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2020.4.4 (in Ukrainian)

9. Myndresku, Y. (2020). Peculiarities of Strategic Planning of Anti-Corruption Policy in Romania. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (41), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2020.41.174-184

10. Navickienė, Ž., Tamelė, I., & Shepitko, M. (2025). Corruption at the Crossroads of Security: Exposing Threats, Building Defence/Resilience. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 11(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2025.11.02.009

11. OECD. (2023). Strengthening Romania’s Integrity and Anti-corruption Measures. OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/ff88cfa4-en

12. OECD. (2025). Reforming Bulgaria’s Anti-corruption Authorities: Towards Effective Strategic Planning and Asset Recovery. OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/11ef33c9-en

13. Ohorodniichuk, M. V., & Kovalenko, N. V. (2025). Antykoruptsiini zakhody v systemi derzhavnoho upravlinnia Ukrainy [Anti-corruption measures in the system of state governance of Ukraine]. Publichne upravlinnia i polityka – Public administration and politics, 6(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.6.03

14. Oprea, A. (2024). Behind anti-corruption, the transformations of society – investigation into the politicization of “illegal personal enrichment” in Romania. Frontiers in Political Science, (6), 1393060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1393060

15. Panasiuk, O. P. (2025). Protydiia koruptsii v Ukraini: kontseptualni pidkhody ta stratehichni priorytety [Counteracting corruption in Ukraine: conceptual approaches and strategic priorities]. Tsentralnoukrainskyi visnyk prava ta publichnoho upravlinnia – Central Ukrainian Journal of Law and Public Administration, (3), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.32782/cuj-2025-3-10 (in Ukrainian)

16. Predmestnikov, O. H., & Skrebovska, S. V. (2025). Metodolohiia analizu efektyvnosti antykoruptsiinykh orhaniv: dosvid Ukrainy ta yevropeiskykh derzhav [Methodology for analyzing the effectiveness of anti-corruption bodies: experience of Ukraine and European states]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 5(91), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.91.5.42 (in Ukrainian)

17. Starenkyi, O. S. (2026). Instytutsiinyi rozvytok Natsionalnoho ahentstva z pytan zapobihannia koruptsii yak harantiia realizatsii antykoruptsiinoi polityky v Ukraini [Institutional development of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as a guarantee of anti-corruption policy implementation in Ukraine]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo – Analytical-comparative jurisprudence, 2(1), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2026.01.2.48 (in Ukrainian)

18. Croatian Parliament. (2021). Strategy for the Prevention of Corruption for the Period from 2021 to 2030. Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia (Narodne novine), No. 120/2021. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2021_11_120_2069.html

19. Treshchov, M. M. (2023). Stan ta perspektyvy realizatsii antykoruptsiinoi polityky v Ukraini: komparatyvna analityka [State and Prospects of Anti-Corruption Policy Implementation in Ukraine: Comparative Analysis]. Naukovyi visnyk lotnoi akademii. Seriia: ekonomika, menedzhment ta pravo – Scientific Bulletin of the Aviation Academy. Series: Economics, Management and Law, (8), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.33251/2707-8620-2023-8-48-56 (in Ukrainian)

20. Voitenko, Y. (2022). Yevropeiska praktyka borotby z koruptsiieiu: dosvid dlia Ukrainy v ramkakh yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv [European practice of combating corruption: experience for Ukraine within the framework of European integration processes]. Politicus, (4–2), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-9616.2022-spec.4 (in Ukrainian)

21. Zankina, E. (2026). Corruption Drives Bulgaria’s Cycle of Political Instability. Current History, 125(869), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2026.125.869.104

22. Zawadzki, P. (2020). Corruption in the Balkans as an obstacle to the Three Seas Initiative: overview of anti-corruption institutions in Bulgaria, Croatia, Poland, Romania and Slovenia. Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 4(2), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2020.04.02.04

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Mykhaylo Dubel