THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATURAL AND DIGITAL HUMAN RIGHTS: PROBLEMS OF LEGAL DEFINITION
PDF

Keywords

human dignity
freedom
digital environment
human identity
personal autonomy
natural and digital human rights
international standards
legal regulation
legal definitions

How to Cite

Morska, N. (2026). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATURAL AND DIGITAL HUMAN RIGHTS: PROBLEMS OF LEGAL DEFINITION. Philosophy and Governance, (2(18). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2026.2.11

Abstract

This paper delves into the link connecting innate and digital human entitlements via a philosophical viewpoint. Special attention is paid to viewing digital prerogatives as a potential continuation of established notions of innate law. The chief difficulties mentioned concern the lack of a common method for specifying a person's digital entitlements and the intricacy of harmonizing these with natural rights. The aim of this study is a deep philosophical and legal comprehension of the bond between original and digital human entitlements, and to confirm the workability of creating a global understanding of digital rights. The research utilises dialectical, historical-philosophical, comparative-legal, formal-legal, systemic, hermeneutic, axiological, and generalisation techniques. The outcomes showed that an individual's digital entitlements surface as a fresh facet of protecting volition and privacy amid digitalisation; they partly uphold the notion of inherent rights, yet concurrently necessitate their separate legal and philosophical foundation due to the distinct features of the digital realm. The fundamental essence of human entitlements as a philosophical and legal concept within jurisprudence is clarified. The substance and chief characteristics of innate human rights are examined, and their standing in the contemporary legal structure is established.  The development of scientific methods for comprehending human entitlements and their impact on shaping the contemporary notion of rights is examined. The substance and juridical essence of electronic human entitlements as an element of information statute are unveiled. The primary categories of digital entitlements are established, and their characteristics are described amid society's digitalization. Worldwide legal standards regarding human rights are examined. The link between inherent and electronic human privileges is explored, with their connection and potential ordering ascertained. Difficulties within the judicial definition of digital human privileges are noted, principally the lack of a uniform approach to their grasp. Disagreements between local and worldwide laws concerning the control of digital entitlements are assessed. The potential for merging legal positivism with inherent law perspectives during the specification of digital rights is evaluated. Conceptual frameworks for grasping digital rights as a fresh phase in the progression of personal freedoms amid worldwide digital metamorphosis are sketched out.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2026.2.11
PDF

References

1. Ahmed Taha, A. H. (2023). The International Protection of Human Rights in the Digital Age and its Impact on International Responsibility. Journal of Law and Emerging Technologies, 3(2), 429–468. https://doi.org/10.54873/jolets.v3i2.160

2. Airapetov, M. A. (2025). Tsyfrovi prava i svobody liudyny. realnist bez nalezhnoho unormuvannia [Digital human rights and freedoms: a reality without proper regulation]. Visnyk NTUU «KPI». Politolohiia. Sotsiolohiia. Pravo, 1(65), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2025.1(65).332569 (in Ukrainian)

3. Andrushchenko, O.P. (2023). Vplyv tsyfrovizatsii na tsinnisni priorytety rozvytku prav liudyny [The impact of digitalization on the value priorities of human rights development]. Informatsiia i pravo, 4(47), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2023.4(47).291594 (in Ukrainian)

4. Bieliakov, K. I., Tykhomyrov, O. O., Radovetska, L. V., & Kostenko, O. V. (2023). Digital rights in the human rights system. Intereulaweast, X (1), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2023.10.1.10

5. Bielov, D.M., Peresh, I.Ye., & Pokorba, I. (2024). Tsyfrovi prava liudyny: doktrynalni zasady [Digital human rights: Doctrinal foundations]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo, (2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.17 (in Ukrainian)

6. Bochkovoi, V. A., & Baadzhy, N. A. (2025). Obmezhennia tsyfrovykh prav liudyny v umovakh suchasnykh pravovykh vyklykiv [Restrictions on digital human rights in the face of modern legal challenges]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu, 84(4), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.84.4.31 (in Ukrainian)

7. Byelov, D., & Bielova, M. (2024). Digital human rights: separate doctrinal basis. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights, (1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.1.1

8. Capellà i Ricart, A. (2025). Fundamental Rights’ Protection in the Digital Environment: Collective Actions Defending Diffuse Interests and Public Interest. Journal of Consumer Policy, (48), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-025-09604-2

9. Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190246693.001.0001

10. Didukh, Kh.V. (2024). Tsyfrovi prava: ukrainskyi ta yevropeiskyi dosvid [Digital rights: Ukrainian and European experience]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu, 85(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.85.1.7 (in Ukrainian)

11. Dukalskis, A. (2023). A fox in the henhouse: China, normative change, and the UN Human Rights Council. Journal of Human Rights, 22(3), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2023.2193971

12. Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Convention_ENG

13. United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

14. Marchenko, A., & Marchenko, O. (2025). Relihiia i vlada u filosofii M. Fuko [Religion and power in the philosophy of M. Foucault]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu, (59), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2025.59.16 (in Ukrainian)

15. Pyvovar, I. V. (2025). Suchasna model realizatsii prava na liudsku hidnist [A modern model of implementing the right to human dignity]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, (2), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.32782/2311-8040/2025-2-2 (in Ukrainian)

16. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/HIS/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679

17. Shaelou, S., & Razmetaeva, Y. (2023). Challenges to Fundamental Human Rights in the age of Artificial Intelligence Systems: shaping the digital legal order while upholding Rule of Law principles and European values. ERA Forum, (24), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-023-00777-2

18. Shany, Y. (2023). Digital Rights and the Outer Limits of International Human Rights Law. German Law Journal, (24), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.35

19. Teravosa, G., & Nagari, S. B. (2025). Digital Constitutionalism and the Future of Human Rights: A Comparative Review. Legalis: Journal of Law Review, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.61978/legalis.v3i1.791

20. Tillaboev, S. (2023). Digital human rights. What are the main human rights in the digital environment? International Journal of Law and Criminology, 3(8), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume03Issue08-09

21. Tsurkan-Saifulina, Yu.V. (2024). Poniattia svobody u filosofii prava: vid klasychnykh teorii do suchasnykh realii [The concept of freedom in the philosophy of law: from classical theories to modern realities]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, (9), 438–440. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2024-9/105 (in Ukrainian)

22. United Nations General Assembly. (2023). Resolution 78/213. https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/78/213

23. Yamnenko, T. M., & Misko, D. O. (2022). Rozvytok tsyfrovykh prav v Ukraini [Development of digital rights in Ukraine]. Yurydychnyi visnyk, 4(65), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.65.17045 (in Ukrainian)

24. Yeung, K., & Lodge, M. (Eds.) (2019). Algorithmic Regulation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838494.001.0001

25. United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Zahalna deklaratsiia prav liudyny [Universal Declaration of Human Rights]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015#Text (in Ukrainian)

26. Zakharchuk, I. V. (2025). Tsyfrovi prava hromadian Ukrainy: konstytutsiino-pravove zakriplennia ta mekhanizmy realizatsii [Digital rights of citizens of Ukraine: Constitutional and legal enshrining and implementation mechanisms]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 90(1), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.90.1.34 (in Ukrainian)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Nataliia Morska