Abstract
The relevance of the problem under study is determined by the changing significance of religion in the life of modern man and the emergence of new forms of religiosity and spirituality. The problem of identity, the inner core of human essence, and its independence is one of the main issues of philosophical anthropology, which remains highly relevant at all times. Today, it is determined both by large-scale transformations of religious culture itself and by the tasks of understanding them in a contemporary theological context. The purpose of the study is to determine the perspective of gender in anthropological, religious studies, and theological concepts. Scientific and technological progress and religious culture, expanding the boundaries of control over the surrounding world, mark a point of no return to the traditional understanding of the foundations of human existence in the world. Urbanization, the active spread of new forms of religion and social transformation, the revision of internal moral imperatives, and, at the same time, the growing influence of the mass media and mass culture on people’s consciousness are changing people’s ideas about themselves as natural beings and as religious beings. Philosophy is also undergoing a revision of both methods and theoretical priorities against the backdrop of a general trend away from classical rationalism. This is linked to attempts by religion to solve the problem of human subjectivity, with the gender approach forming and proposing its own methodology for understanding subjectivity within the discourse of gender theory as a new direction in religious studies and theology.
References
1. Aune, K. (2015). Feminist spirituality as lived religion: How UK feminists forge religio-spiritual lives. Gender & Society, 29(1), 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214545681
2. Bartelink B. (2025). Unsettled grounds: religion, gender and sexual nationalism in a Dutch city. Religion, State & Society: The Keston Journal, 52(5), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2024.2430096
3. Calef, S. (2009). Charting new territory religion and “the Gender-Critical Turn”. In S. Calef, R. A. Simkins (Eds.), Women, Gender, and Religion (pp. 1–5). Journal of Religion & Society. https://moses.creighton.edu/jrs/toc/SS05.html
4. Chan, E., & Di, D. (2024). Faithfully gendered? How religious attendance shapes views of women’s leadership in politics and business cross-nationally. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, (10). https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241286377
5. Favale, A. (2024). Gender identity theory and christian anthropology. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 67 (1). https://www.galaxie.com/article/jets67-1-09
6. Ge, E., DongZhi, C., & Mace, R. (2024). Religiosity and gender bias structure social networks. Evolutionary human sciences, (6), e23. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2024.16
7. Giovannini, C., Sisti, L. G., Michieli, R., Angelucci, M. A., Ricciardi, W., & Malorni, W. (2023). Culture, religion and gender: considerations in facing migration related health inequalities in Italy. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita, 59(3), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_23_03_05
8. Hardy, S. A., Nelson, J. M., Moore, J. P., & King, P. E. (2019). Processes of religious and spiritual influence in adolescence: A systematic review of 30 years of research. Journal of Research on Adolescence: The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 29(2), 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12486
9. Hawthorne, S. M. (2005). Feminism: Feminism, Gender Studies, and Religion. In L. Jones (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Religions (pp. 3023–3027). Farrington Hills, MI: Thompson Gale. https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofre0000unse_v8f2
10. Jeserich, F., Klein, C., Brinkhaus, B., & Teut, M. (2023). Sense of coherence and religion/spirituality: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on a methodical classification of instruments measuring religion/spirituality. PloS one, 18(8), e0289203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289203
11. Kent, B. V., Davidson, J. C., Zhang, Y., Pargament, K. I., VanderWeele, T. J., Koenig, H., Underwood, L. G., Krause, N., Kanaya, A. M., Tworoger, S. S., Schachter, A. B., Cole, S., O’Leary, M., Cozier, Y., Daviglus, M., Giachello, A. L., Zacher, T., Palmer, J. R., & Shields, A. E. (2021). Religion and spirituality among American Indian, South Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latina, and White Women in the study on stress, spirituality, and health. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 60(1), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12695
12. Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012(1), 278730. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730
13. Leszczyńska, K., & Zielińska, K. (2016). Gender in religion? Religion in gender? Commentary on theory and research on gender and religion. Studia humanistyczne AGN, 15(3), 7–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/human.2016.15.3.7
14. Miller, Alan S., Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology, 107(6), 1399–1423. https://doi.org/10.1086/342557
15. Notermans, C., & Tonnaer, A. (2024). Revaluing gender and religion in the anthropological debate of the anthropocene: A critique on the threefold culture–nature–supernature divide. Religions, 15(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15020218
16. Rowatt, W. C., Latendresse, S., Kent, B. V., Fergus, T. A., Warner, E. T., Marr, J., Cozier, Y. C., Kanaya, A. M., Eliassen, A. H., Daviglus, M. L., Cole, S. A., Chavarro, J. E., Pargament, K. I., & Shields, A. E. (2025). The structure of religion and spirituality in a diverse sample of adults in the U.S.: A report on exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in the study on stress, spirituality, and health. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, (10). https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000585
17. Warner, E. T., Kent, B. V., Zhang, Y., Argentieri, M. A., Rowatt, W. C., Pargament, K., Koenig, H. G., Underwood, L., Cole, S. A., Daviglus, M. L., Kanaya, A. M., Palmer, J. R., Huang, T., Blais, M. A., & Shields, A. E. (2021). The study on stress, spirituality, and health (SSSH): Psychometric evaluation and initial validation of the sssh baseline spirituality survey. Religions, 12(3), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12030150
18. Williamson, M. (2025). Cultural influences on transgender rights: Examining the role of religion. Politics & Gender, 21(4), 767–793. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X25000078

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Mykola Shcherban, Ivan Kramarchuk
