Abstract
The article examines religious consciousness as a dynamic phenomenon within the context of globalization and migration crises, with a particular focus on the European space. The relevance of the topic stems from the changing nature of the interaction between religion and the public sphere in the post-secular era, when religion re-emerges not as an institution but as a symbolic language of ethical choice, personal reflection, and cultural mobilization. The article aims to examine the mechanisms of transformation of religious consciousness within environments of transcultural displacement and to determine its role in new modes of public visibility. The study analyzes key theoretical approaches to the study of religious consciousness, particularly the concepts of post-secularity (J. Habermas), transnationalism (S. Vertovec), the symbolic power of religion (T. Asad), and the deprivatization of faith (J. Casanova). Based on empirical examples from France, the Netherlands, Germany, and Sweden, it is shown that the religious consciousness of migrants and refugees manifests in new forms: flexible, non-institutional, and often formally invisible, yet deeply rooted in everyday practices. The article examines examples of youth initiatives, practices of religious resistance, informal education, and forms of spiritual reflection among Ukrainian displaced persons after 2022. Special attention is given to the gap between religious identity and actual denominational affiliation, which indicates a transformation in belief structures under conditions of global mobility. It is argued that religious consciousness in the contemporary migration context does not disappear under the pressure of secular norms, but rather adapts and acquires the form of a communicative resource, an ethical marker, and a symbolic self-assertion. Conditions of global mobility and cultural fragmentation contribute to the emergence of new types of belief that call for a revision of classical notions of religion as a stable, dogmatic, or exclusively institutional structure. Religion emerges as a field of reflexive action, maintaining the capacity for symbolic renewal in times of crisis. In this context, religious consciousness becomes significant not only as a personal category but also as a cultural-political one, influencing the formation of new forms of civic engagement and social coexistence.
References
1. Andrushko, Y., & Lanza, S. (2024). Exploring resilience and its determinants in the forced migration of Ukrainian citizens: A psychological perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111409
2. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press. https://archive.org/details/TalalAsadFormationsOfTheSecularChristianityIslamModernityPdf
3. Calhoun, C. (2008). Secularism, citizenship, and the public sphere. Hedgehog Review, 10(3), 7–21. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/42645/
4. Calhoun, C. (2013). Rethinking secularism. Hedgehog Review, 12(3), 35–48. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/42624/
5. Casanova, H. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/publicreligionsi00casa
6. Grace, D. (1994). Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without belonging. Institute of Contemporary British History.
7. Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x
8. Heyne, S., Kuhlerman, J., & Kogan, I. (2025). Partnership preferences in modern migration societies: Religious homophily among young Muslims and Christians in Germany. European Journal of Population, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-024-09728-0
9. Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press. https://psi424.cankaya.edu.tr/uploads/files/Hobsbawm_and_Ranger_eds_The_Invention_of_Tradition.pdf
10. Katzenstein, P. (2006). Multiple modernities as limits to secular Europeanization? In T. A. Byrnes & P. J. Katzenstein (Eds.), Religion in an Expanding Europe (pp. 1–33). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491917.002
11. Kern, S. (2005). French suburbs becoming “separate Islamic societies.” Gatestone Institute. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2487/french-suburbs-islamic-societies
12. Le Figaro. (2020, September 8). Sondage : les jeunes musulmans plus radicaux que leurs aînés. Le Figaro. https://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/sondage-les-jeunes-musulmans-plus-radicaux-que-leurs-aines-20200908
13. Maier, K., Konaszewski, K., Skalski, S. B., Büssing, A., & Surzykiewicz, J. (2022). Spiritual Needs, Religious Coping and Mental Wellbeing: A Cross-Sectional Study among Migrants and Refugees in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063415
14. Muslim Climate Watch. (2025). About. https://muslimclimatewatch.com/about/
15. NL Times. (2025, March 31). Half of schools face resistance from parents over sexual education. NL Times. https://nltimes.nl/2025/03/31/half-schools-face-resistance-parents-sexual-education
16. Pew Research Center. (2017, November 29). Europe’s growing Muslim population: Muslims are projected to increase as a share of Europe’s population – even with no future migration. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population
17. Siegert, M. (2020). Die Religionszugehörigkeit, religiöse Praxis und soziale Einbindung von Geflüchteten (Vol. 2, 15 p.). BAMF. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/68296
18. Sultan, E. (2022). “I come here to know”: Muslims navigating space, (in)visibility, and fluidity of religious practice in Uppsala, Sweden [Master’s thesis, Uppsala University, Department of Cultural Anthropology and Ethnology]. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10657.48483
19. Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927083
20. Woodhead, L. (2008). Gendering secularisation theory. Social Compass, 55(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768607089738

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dymytrii Zaiets, Mykola Kozlovets
