SIGNIFICANCE OF ROLLED STEEL QUALITY FOR STRUCTURAL DURABILITY AND SAFETY: A MULTI-FACTOR ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
PDF

Keywords

rolled steel quality
structural durability
building safety
corrosion resistance
safety margin
lifecycle cost
protective coatings
structural reliability

How to Cite

Avetisyan, N. (2026). SIGNIFICANCE OF ROLLED STEEL QUALITY FOR STRUCTURAL DURABILITY AND SAFETY: A MULTI-FACTOR ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK. Public Management and Policy, (5(21). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2026.5.18

Abstract

Structural steel quality is widely recognized as a factor in building longevity and safety, yet the relationship between specific rolled steel characteristics and measurable structural performance outcomes over multi-decade service periods has not been systematized into a practical assessment tool. This article develops a Multi-Factor Durability-Safety Assessment Framework that connects five rolled steel quality factors (grade compliance, dimensional tolerance, protective coating integrity, weldability, documentary traceability) to three structural performance domains (load-bearing reliability, corrosion resistance, safety margin preservation over time). The framework is grounded in field observations of over 40 steel structures across warehouse, industrial, and commercial applications, assessed during periodic site visits over 3 to 10 years of service in various environmental exposure conditions. Observed data indicate that structures fabricated from fully certified and appropriately protected rolled steel exhibit 40–60% lower visual deterioration scores at the five-year mark, maintain design safety margins within acceptable bounds through the observation period, and require 30–50% fewer maintenance interventions compared to structures built with unverified or inadequately protected material. Lifecycle cost projections incorporating initial material investment and estimated maintenance expenditure suggest that premium-quality rolled steel reduces aggregate 25-year ownership costs by approximately 20–35% despite higher purchase price. The framework provides procurement and design professionals with a structured method for evaluating how material quality decisions at the specification stage affect structural outcomes across the full-service life.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2026.5.18
PDF

References

1. Angst, U. M. (2018). Challenges and opportunities in corrosion of steel in concrete. Materials and Structures, (51), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1131-6

2. Ebrahimi, N., Roshanfar, M., Momeni, M., & Naboka, O. (2025). Corrosion performance of atmospheric corrosion resistant steel bridges in the current climate: A performance review. Materials, 18(15), Article 3510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18153510

3. European Committee for Standardization. (2019). EN 10025-2:2019. Hot rolled products of structural steels—Part 2: Technical delivery conditions for non-alloy structural steels. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/hot-rolled-products-of-structural-steels-technical-delivery-conditions-for-non-alloy-structural-steels-1

4. European Committee for Standardization. (2018). EN 1090-2:2018. Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures—Part 2: Technical requirements for steel structures. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/execution-of-steel-structures-and-aluminium-structures-technical-requirements-for-steel-structures-1

5. European Committee for Standardization. (2014). EN 1993-1-1:2005+A1:2014. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. https://www.evs.ee/en/evs-en-1993-1-1-2005-a1-2014

6. European Committee for Standardization. (2005). EN 1993-1-9:2005. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-9: Fatigue. https://www.evs.ee/en/evs-en-1993-1-9-2005

7. European Committee for Standardization. (2015). EN 10346:2015. Continuously hot-dip coated steel flat products for cold forming—Technical delivery conditions. https://www.dinmedia.de/en/standard/din-en-10346/226007287

8. International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO 12944-2:2017. Paints and varnishes—Corrosion protection of steel structures by protective paint systems—Part 2: Classification of environments. https://www.iso.org/standard/64834.html

9. International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO 9223:2012. Corrosion of metals and alloys—Corrosivity of atmospheres—Classification, determination and estimation. https://www.iso.org/standard/53499.html

10. Li, C. Q., & Yang, W. (2021). Steel corrosion and degradation of its mechanical properties. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003119791

11. Manu, K. C., Madhushree, C., Chandini, M. S., Shree, N., Hemanth, S., & Jeevan, T. P. (2025). Corrosion in steel structures: A review. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 73(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/46985

12. Mokhtari, E., Heidarpour, A., & Javidan, F. (2024). Mechanical performance of high strength steel under corrosion: A review study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (220), Article 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108840

13. Roberge, P. R. (2008). Corrosion engineering: Principles and practice. McGraw-Hill. https://books.google.com/books?id=PF6ZjjSHcn4C

14. Wardenier, J., Packer, J. A., Zhao, X.-L., & van der Vegte, G. J. (2010). Hollow sections in structural applications (2nd ed.). CIDECT. https://www.cidect.org/books/

15. Wei, H., Tang, Y., Liu, Y.-P., & Chan, S.-L. (2025). Research on durability and mechanical properties of high strength steel in corrosive environment: A review. Structures, (78), Article 109324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109324

16. World Steel Association. (2024). World steel in figures 2024. https://worldsteel.org/wp-content/uploads/World-Steel-in-Figures-2024.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Norayr Avetisyan