VERIFICATION AND CONTROL OF INTERNATIONAL TREATY REGULATION ON MISSILE-NUCLEAR ARMAMENTS
PDF

Keywords

intelligence support
verification
arms control
missile-nuclear domain
international legal regimes
strategic stability
risk monitoring
automated analysis systems

How to Cite

Myronenko, V. (2025). VERIFICATION AND CONTROL OF INTERNATIONAL TREATY REGULATION ON MISSILE-NUCLEAR ARMAMENTS. Public Management and Policy, (11(15). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.11.12

Abstract

In the context of the weakening of international treaties on missile-nuclear arms control and the rise of asymmetric threats, traditional verification mechanisms have become increasingly ineffective. The study is relevant for scientifically substantiating the transformation of arms control approaches by integrating intelligence tools as a key element to ensure transparency and confidence. The aim of the article is to develop a conceptual model for integrating intelligence support into verification mechanisms for nuclear and missile systems, considering Ukraine’s needs and the current state of international legal regimes. The research employs a complex of general scientific and specialized methods, including systems analysis, analytical, comparative-legal, and synthetic approaches. It examines international agreements, including the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and bilateral strategic arms agreements, as well as the use of national technical monitoring means, satellite surveillance, open-source intelligence, and electronic intelligence. The analysis demonstrates that existing verification mechanisms are undergoing a structural crisis due to political paralysis and institutional limitations. Intelligent technologies and big data processing have become the primary source of information for compliance assessment. A three-tier integration model is proposed: organizational level (establishment of an International Nuclear Risk Monitoring Center involving Ukraine, NATO, and the IAEA), technological level (automated satellite data processing, electronic intelligence, and AI-based escalation forecasting), and regulatory level (automation of responses to violations, legally binding data exchange protocols). Integrating intelligence support into international arms control mechanisms allows for a transition from declarative and reactive approaches to preventive risk management. This transformation is especially relevant for non-nuclear states participating in collective security mechanisms, such as Ukraine. The proposed model provides a reliable foundation for building technologically oriented, transparent, and legally grounded arms control systems.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.11.12
PDF

References

1. Allison R. (2025). Averting acute escalation in Russia's war against Ukraine. International Affairs, 101(5), 1769–1791. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaf137

2. Arms Control Association. (2022, October 26). Toward a new nuclear arms control framework arrangement. https://www.armscontrol.org/issue-briefs/2022-10/toward-new-nuclear-arms-control-framework-arrangement

3. Arndt A. C., Horovitz L., Onderco M. (2023). Russia’s Failed Nuclear Coercion Against Ukraine. The Washington Quarterly, 46(3), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2023.2259665

4. Bell M. S. (2024). The Russia-Ukraine War and Nuclear Weapons: Evaluating Familiar Insights. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 7(2), 494–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2024.2425379

5. Brashears, S. (2025). Verification at risk: Examining growing challenges to verify arms control regimes (Unclassified working paper). Center for Global Security Research, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. https://cgsr.llnl.gov/sites/cgsr/files/2025-03/verification-at-risk.pdf

6. Fink A. L. (2024). Russia's Nuclear and Coercive Signaling During the War in Ukraine. Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IN12464

7. Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2023). World nuclear forces (SIPRI Yearbook 2024: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, Chap. 7). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/YB24%2007%20WNF.pdf

8. Kühn, U. (2023). Strategic Stability in the 21st Century: An Introduction. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2223804

9. McNamara, E. M. (2024). Nuclear arms control policies and safety in artificial intelligence: Transferable lessons or false equivalence? FIIA Briefing Paper 381. Finnish Institute of International Affairs. https://fiia.fi/en/publication/nuclear-arms-control-policies-and-safety-in-artificial-intelligence

10. NATO. (2024, July 19). NATO enhancing intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance force with additional capabilities. https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/articles/news/2024/07/19/nato-enhancing-intelligence-surveillance-and-reconnaissance-force-with-additional-capabilities

11. Paul, R. (2024, November 25). Bluff and bluster: Why Putin revised Russia’s nuclear doctrine. European Leadership Network. https://europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/bluff-and-bluster-why-putin-revised-russias-nuclear-doctrine/

12. Persi Paoli, G., Vignard, K., Danks, D., & Meyer, P. (2020). Modernizing arms control: Exploring responses to the use of AI in military decision‑making. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). https://www.unidir.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Modernizing-Arms-Control-Final.pdf

13. Radin, A., Holynska, K., Tretter, C., & Van Bibber, T. (2025). Lessons from the War in Ukraine for space: Challenges and opportunities for future conflicts (Research Report No. RR‑A2950‑1). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2950-1.html

14. Santoro D. (2023). Getting Past No: Developing a Nuclear Arms Control Relationship with China. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 6(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2221830

15. The United States Accuses Russia of Not Complying with New START Treaty and Russia Suspends Its Participation. (2023). American Journal of International Law, 117(3), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.27

16. U.S. Department of State. (2023, June 1). Russian noncompliance with and invalid suspension of the New START Treaty. United States Department of State. https://2021-2025.state.gov/russian-noncompliance-with-and-invalid-suspension-of-the-new-start-treaty/

17. United Nations. (2022, August 26). Non‑Proliferation Treaty Review Conference ends without adopting substantive outcome document due to opposition by one member state (Press release DC/3850). United Nations. https://press.un.org/en/2022/dc3850.doc.htm

18. Vignard, K. (Ed.). (2010). Arms control verification (Disarmament Forum No. 3). United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). https://unidir.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/arms-control-verification-en-320.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Vyacheslav Myronenko