Keywords
crisis communication
internal and external channels
the Armed Forces
public trust
anti-corruption policy
communications
transparency
digitalization
How to Cite
Abstract
Active digitalization processes and the development of technological innovations determine the need to transform the public administration system in the context of communication support. At the same time, an inevitable stage of the European integration development of management processes is seen as an increase in the level of information security and an effective fight against corruption. The purpose of the article is to determine the potential for the development of communication support in public administration in the context of the implementation of anti-corruption policy. The article analyzes theoretical approaches, identifies the main problems in communication between governmental structures and the public, and outlines the ways to solve them. The author proposes a unified model for improving communications, which takes into account modern digital tools, transparency of information and active participation of civil society. It is found that the key aspects of communication improvement of management processes are the provision of electronic information and the provision of e-services, as well as the improvement of the process of interaction between public administration, the business sector and the public. It is substantiated that the integration of modern information and communication solutions into the practical processes of public administration increases the efficiency and accuracy of management decisions, minimizes the threat of confidential data leakage, and promotes partnerships between all stakeholders in the public administration system. The study proves that the digitalization of the communication environment has a positive impact on the upgrade of public administration in the context of preventing corruption risks.
References
1. Pro ratyfikatsiiu Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony [On the Ratification of the Association Agreement between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, on the other hand]. Law of Ukraine dated September 16, 2014, No. 1678-VII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1678-18#n2 (in Ukrainian)
2. Demchyk, N. P. (2024). Realizatsiia antykoruptsiinoi stratehii v Ukraini [Implementation of the anti-corruption strategy in Ukraine]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal – Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, (3), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2024-3/673 (in Ukrainian)
3. Dumchykov, M. O. (2025). Tsyfrovi instrumenty v borotbi z koruptsiieiu: yak tekhnolohii zminiuiut robotu pravookhoronnykh orhaniv [Digital tools in the fight against corruption: how technology changes the work of law enforcement agencies]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal – Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, (4), 274–277. http://www.lsej.org.ua/index.php/arkhiv-nomeriv?id=185 (in Ukrainian)
4. Leshchenko, A. (2025). Shliakhy udoskonalennia systemy zapobihannia koruptsii v derzhavnomu ta publichnomu upravlinni Ukrainy [Ways to improve the system of preventing corruption in state and public administration of Ukraine]. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannia derzhavotvorennia – Theoretical and Applied Issues of State-Building, (33), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.35432/tisb332025331766 (in Ukrainian)
5. Balan, M. I. (2019). Derzhavno-upravlinski zasady zabezpechennia suspilno-politychnoi stabilnosti [State-management principles of ensuring socio-political stability]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: Practice and Experience, (5), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2019.5.152 (in Ukrainian)
6. Namesnik, V., Zhosan, H., Razumei, H., Razumei, M., Savon, K., Piharieva, Yu., & Kosteniuk, N. (2022). Antykoruptsiini tsyfrovi rishennia: dosvid Ukrainy ta osoblyvist yikh vprovadzhennia v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Anti-corruption digital solutions: Ukraine's experience and peculiarities of their implementation under martial law]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Derzhavne upravlinnia – Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Public Administration, 2(16), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2022/16-2/7 (in Ukrainian)
7. Iurieva, A. O., & Chaika, S. V. (2025). Antykoruptsiina komunikatsiia v rehionalnykh orhanakh publichnoho upravlinnia. Upravlinnia rozvytkom sotsialno-ekonomichnykh system [Anti-corruption communication in regional public administration. Management of the development of socio-economic systems]. In Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference (dedicated to the memory of Professor Hryhorii Mazniev) (Vol. 3, pp. 569–173). Kharkiv: State Biotechnological University. https://biotechuniv.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/conf-06-07-03-25-mater3.pdf#page=570 (in Ukrainian)
8. Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A. L. (2024). Rol reklamnoi diialnosti ta tsyfrovizatsii u mediatyzatsii antykoruptsiinoi polityky [The role of advertising and digitalization in the mediatization of anti-corruption policy]. Publichne administruvannia ta natsionalna bezpeka – Public Administration and National Security, (3). https://doi.org/10.25313/2617-572X-2024-3 (in Ukrainian)
9. Fedchenko, O. (2022). Analiz faktoriv ta suchasnykh zahroz informatsiinii bezpetsi derzhavy u konteksti zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [Analysis of factors and modern threats to the information security of the state in the context of ensuring the national security of Ukraine]. Social Development and Security, 12(3), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2022.12.3.11 (in Ukrainian)
10. Popravka, M. O. (2024). Informatsiina viina v konteksti hibrydnoho konfliktu [Information warfare in the context of hybrid conflict]. Mizhnarodni ta politychni doslidzhennia – International and Political Studies, (38), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.32782/2707-5206.2024.38.22 (in Ukrainian)
11. Sánchez-Soriano, M., Arango-Ramírez, P. M., Pérez-López, E. I., & García-Montalvo, I. A. (2024). Inclusive governance: empowering communities and promoting social justice. Frontiers in Political Science, (6). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1478126
12. Ieromka, D., & Tabatskyi, M. (2024). Rol informatsiinykh-komunikatsiinykh tekhnolohii ta hromadianskoho suspilstva u rozvytku mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [The Role of Information and Communication Technologies and Civil Society in the Development of Local Self-Government]. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 332(4), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2024-332-54 (in Ukrainian)
13. Galych, O. A., & Demydkin, O. S. (2021). Osoblyvosti informatsiinykh system i tekhnolohii publichnoho upravlinnia ta administruvannia v konteksti yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv [Features of information systems and technologies of public management and administration in the context of European integration processes]. Economics. Finance. Management: Topical Issues of Science and Practice, (2), 151–166. http://doi.org/10.37128/2411-4413-2021-2-11 (in Ukrainian)
14. Krasivskyy, O. (2023). Osoblyvosti zaluchennia hromadskosti ta tsyfrovizatsii posluh pry reformuvanni publichnoho upravlinnia pid chas viiny [Specific features of public involvement and digitalization of services when reforming public administration during the war]. Democratic Governance, 16(1), 12–23. https://d-governance.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/DG_1(31)_12-23.pdf (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Oleh Sydorenko, Hanna Panchenko