RUSSIA’S INTERESTS IN THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP REGION: KEY CHALLENGES
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

Eastern Partnership
European Union
security
Russia
Russian-Ukrainian war
hybrid threats

How to Cite

Abrat, S. (2025). RUSSIA’S INTERESTS IN THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP REGION: KEY CHALLENGES. Public Management and Policy, (3(7). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.3.06

Abstract

The article focuses on the study of the Russian Federation's key interests in the countries of the Eastern Partnership region. It is found that the main Russian interests in this region are historical, geopolitical, economic, security, ideological, and ethnic. Russia's interests in the Eastern Partnership region stem from the type of foreign policy of this state and the geopolitical concepts that underlie its main state activities. In particular, these are the imperial doctrine, the “Russian world” doctrine, and the concept of “hard power” as the basis for the implementation of Russian foreign policy. The author assesses Russia’s influence on each of the EaP countries. It is found that all six states have a significant influence on their domestic and foreign policies by the Moscow. Russia uses weapons, threats of force, separatism, ideology, energy blackmail, propaganda, cyberattacks, formation of pro-Russian forces, weakening of democracy, and corruption to maintain its influence in the EaP states. The most dependent state in the region is Belarus, which is actually under full Russian influence. Moldova and Ukraine are the least dependent, but force and other methods of influence are actively used to keep them in the sphere of Russian influence. The article examines the key challenges for the states of the region from Russia's influence, including the crisis of global and regional security systems, the Russian-Ukrainian war, conflicts in Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh, the energy and humanitarian crises in Europe, and the formation of pro-Russian forces in the region and the EU. In order to resolve the crisis in the Eastern Partnership region, it is important to provide security guarantees from the EU, NATO, and the US to those states that want them. It is also important to create a sustainable system of collective security, guarantees of peace and compliance with international law on a global scale. Integration of the Eastern Partnership states (some of them) into the EU and NATO could be a key to their withdrawal from Russia's influence. The intensification of economic development of these states will also serve as a successful option for breaking away from dependence on Russia.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.3.06
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Tsebenko, O. O. and Shumska, M. V. (2023). Kliuchovi vyklyky ta zahrozy rozvytku initsiatyvy YeS “Skhidne partnerstvo” [Key Challenges and Threats to the Development of the EU Eastern Partnership Initiative]. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny, suspilni komunikatsii ta rehionalni studii – International Relations, Public Communications and Regional Studies, 2(16), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2023-02-62-77 (in Ukrainian)

2. Turchyn, Ya. B., Ivasechko, O. Ya., Tsebenko, O. O., Sukhorolska, I. Yu & Roslon, D. T. (2022). Perspektyvy rozvytku initsiatyvy YeS “Skhidne partnerstvo” v umovakh heopolitychnykh vyklykiv [Prospects for the Development of the EU Eastern Partnership Initiative in the Context of Geopolitical Challenges]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky. (in Ukrainian)

3. Ivasechko, O. & Yablonska, A. (2022). Zahrozy myru ta bezpeky v krainakh-adresatakh Skhidnoho partnerstva (2014–2022 rr.) [Threats to peace and security in the Eastern Partnership countries (2014–2022)]. Rehionalni studii – Regional Study, (31). 91–96. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2022.31.17 (in Ukrainian)

4. Sydoruk, T. (2014). Heopolitychne supernytstvo Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu i Rosii u Skhidnii Yevropi [Geopolitical Rivalry of the European Union and Russia in Eastern Europe]. Studia politologica Ucraino-Polona, (4). 32–38. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Spup_2014_4_6 (in Ukrainian)

5. Іvasechko, O., Turchyn, Ya., Tsebenko, O. & Vezdenko, Ya. (2022). Peculiarities and Prospects of the European Union Involvement in the Settlement of Conflicts on the Territory of the Eastern Partnership Countries. Politics in Central Europe, (18), 633–660. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2022-0026

6. Caras, V. (2021). Eastern Partnership: between linkages with the EU and Russia. Debater a Europa, (25), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_25_2

7. Kaunert, C. (2022). EU Eastern Partnership, Hybrid Warfare and Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Eucrim, (2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2022-011

8. Kaunert, C. & Deus Pereir, J. (2023). EU Eastern Partnership, Ontological Security and EU-Ukraine/Russian warfare. Journal of contemporary European studies, (31), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2183182

9. Piskorska, B. (2018). The Eastern Partnership – A Challenge for the EU’s Soft Power in International Relations. On-line Journal Modelling the New Europe, (26), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2018.26.06

10. Tsebenko, O., & Abrat, S. (2023). The security dimension of EU policy regarding the region of Eastern Partnership. In Y. Turchyn & T. Astramowicz-Leyk (Eds.), Novyi poriadok dennyi dlia Yevropy ta Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: prychyny – napriamy – priorytetni tsili [A new agenda for Europe and the European Union: Reasons – directions – priority goals] (pp. 308–313). Lviv-Olsztyn: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky; Instytut Politychnykh Nauk, Varminsko-Mazurskyi Universytet v Olsztyni. https://lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/2021/pages/14947/vsenovepol.pdf

11. Nye, J. S. (2009). Get Smart: Combining Hard and Soft Power. Foreign Affairs, 88(4), 160–163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20699631

12. Holtsov, A. H. (2015). Heopolityka Rosiiskoi Federatsii v postradianskomu prostori [Geopolitics of the Russian Federation in the post-Soviet space]. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Sciences and Public Management, 1(44), 17–24. https://journals.maup.com.ua/index.php/political/article/view/3436 (in Ukrainian)

13. Lipkan, V. A. (2022). Korinnia dyskryminatsiinoi heopolityky Rosii. Rehionalni studii [The Roots of Russia’s Discriminatory Geopolitics]. Rehionalni studii – Regional study, (30), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2022.30.2 (in Ukrainian)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Сергій Б. Абрат