Keywords
social entrepreneurship
corporate social responsibility
enterprise mission
sustainable development
state of war
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper investigates purpose-driven entrepreneurship – a business model where social mission takes precedence over commercial profit. The topic gains particular significance due to profound shifts in Ukraine’s entrepreneurial culture triggered by the full-scale invasion: a growing number of companies now embed a social dimension into their strategy, treating it not as a supplementary feature but as the very foundation of their business model. Wartime conditions have amplified the demand for entrepreneurial initiatives directed at addressing pressing social challenges – ranging from veteran employment to rebuilding damaged infrastructure. The study aims to delineate the defining characteristics of mission-oriented entrepreneurship in Ukraine, to classify its practical manifestations, and to evaluate how wartime circumstances have reshaped domestic business values, drawing on official statistics, sociological survey data, and reports from international bodies covering 2022–2026. As a result, it was found that during the full-scale invasion, there was a qualitative shift in the motivation of entrepreneurs: the share of companies that systematically integrate the social component into the strategy increased from 24% to 61% during 2022–2025. Registered social enterprises expanded by 109% (from 850 to 1,780), while corporate charitable donations doubled in volume. Comparative data show that mission-oriented enterprises, even with lower near-term profitability (8.2% compared to 11.7%), exhibit stronger three-year survival rates (78% against 54%), greater customer loyalty (71% repeat buyers versus 44%), and reduced employee turnover. Organisational forms of purpose-driven entrepreneurship were classified, and a sectoral review identified the environmental and recycling sector as yielding the highest social return on investment. The paper concludes that purpose-driven entrepreneurship represents both an ethical stance and a viable pathway to sustained competitive advantage. Further progress in this area calls for building adequate institutional foundations: enacting dedicated legislation, implementing social procurement instruments, and establishing robust social impact assessment frameworks.
References
1. Antoshchenkova, V. V., & Deineha, M. V. (2026). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Corporate social responsibility under martial law]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (83). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2026-83-33 (in Ukrainian)
2. Bamiatzi, V., Brieger, S. A., Karakulak, Ö., Kinderman, D., & Manning, S. (2025). The rise of partisan CSR: Corporate responses to the Russia–Ukraine war. Journal of Business Ethics, 198(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05795-9
3. Bohatska, N. M. (2023). Perspektyvy rozvytku sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini [Prospects for the development of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (53). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-53-4 (in Ukrainian)
4. Boida, S. (2023). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo yak instrument pisliavoiennoi vidbudovy ekonomiky Ukrainy [Social entrepreneurship as a tool for post-war reconstruction of Ukraine’s economy]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (58). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-58-25 (in Ukrainian)
5. Daskalopoulou, I., Karakitsiou, A., & Thomakis, Z. (2023). Social entrepreneurship and social capital: A review of impact research. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064787
6. García-Jurado, A., Pérez-Barea, J. J., & Nova, R. J. (2021). A new approach to social entrepreneurship: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sustainability, 13(5), Article 2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052754
7. Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., & Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Mapping the intellectual structure of social entrepreneurship research: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4
8. Ilchenko, V. M. (2022). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo yak indykator svidomosti suspilstva [Social entrepreneurship as an indicator of society’s consciousness]. Ekonomichnyi prostir – Economic Space, (178), 46–50. https://prostir.pdaba.dp.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1067 (in Ukrainian)
9. Klarin, A., & Suseno, Y. (2023). An integrative literature review of social entrepreneurship research: Mapping the literature and future research directions. Business & Society, 62(3), 565–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221101611
10. Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist pid chas viiny ta v povoiennomu vidnovlenni: analitychna zapyska [Corporate social responsibility during the war and in post-war recovery: Analytical note]. (2024). Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen (NISD). https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/sotsialna-polityka/korporatyvna-sotsialna-vidpovidalnist-pid-chas-viyny-ta-v (in Ukrainian)
11. Kosovych, B. I. (2020). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: aktualni pytannia stanovlennia [Social entrepreneurship in Ukraine: Current issues of formation]. Ekonomika ta derzhava – Economy and the State, (3), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2020.3.77 (in Ukrainian)
12. Kot, L. (2022). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo, sotsialne pidpryiemstvo, sotsialnyi pidpryiemets: zasady makroekonomichnoho rozuminnia [Social entrepreneurship, social enterprise, social entrepreneur: Foundations of macroeconomic understanding]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (39). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-39-29 (in Ukrainian)
13. Pisetska, T. (2024). Sutnist sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva ta napriamy spryiannia yoho rozvytku [The essence of social entrepreneurship and directions for promoting its development]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (64). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-64-16 (in Ukrainian)
14. Ramskyi, A. (2023). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: analiz normatyvno-pravovoi bazy ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Social entrepreneurship in Ukraine: Analysis of the regulatory framework and development prospects]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (58). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-58-50 (in Ukrainian)
15. Sabetska, T. (2023). Ekonomichnyi zmist ta istoriia rozvytku sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva [Economic content and history of social entrepreneurship development]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (48). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-48-44 (in Ukrainian)
16. Serikova, O. M. (2022). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu v umovakh viiny v Ukraini: natsionalnyi i hlobalnyi vymiry [Corporate social responsibility of business during the war in Ukraine: National and global dimensions]. Biznes Inform – Business Inform, (6), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-6-94-10 (in Ukrainian)
17. Teasdale, S., Bellazzecca, E., de Bruin, A., & Roy, M. J. (2023). The (R)evolution of the social entrepreneurship concept: A critical historical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 212S–240S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221130691
18. Tertychna, L., & Skotarenko, D. (2026). Rozvytok korporatyvnoho volonterstva pidpryiemstv v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Development of corporate volunteering of enterprises under martial law]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (85). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2026-85-157 (in Ukrainian)
19. Vidpovidalna povedinka biznesu v chasy viiny v Ukraini: doslidzhennia kontekstu [Responsible business behavior during the war in Ukraine: Context study]. (2023). UNDP Ukraine. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-10/undp-ua-zvit_vidpovidalna_povedinka_biznesu_v_chasy_viyny_v_ukraini_ukr.pdf (in Ukrainian)
20. Zelinska, A., Bezditko, O., & Lavrynenko, S. (2026). Korporatyvni tsinnosti ta sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu v systemi upravlinnia stalym rozvytkom pidpryiemstva [Corporate values and social responsibility in the system of enterprise sustainable development management]. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky – Sustainable Development of Economy, 1(58), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2026-58-1 (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Laura Bella, Liudmyla Severyn-Mrachkovska, Taras Lytvyn