Keywords
regional development
regions
territorial communities
martial law
How to Cite
Abstract
Regional development in the context of implementing European practices is a key factor in the realization of Ukraine's European integration strategy. This requires the further introduction of tools aimed at overcoming centralized management practices in favor of decentralization tools that provide greater autonomy for local and regional authorities, creating conditions for accelerating the development of communities and regions. This topic becomes particularly relevant during the state of martial law in Ukraine, which necessitates the consolidation of resources to ensure national security and defense, while also requiring the resolution of pressing social issues (refugees, business relocation, etc.). Therefore, the aim of the article is to study the impact of decentralization on regional development processes in wartime conditions. The methodological basis of the research is a harmonious synthesis of three approaches: systemic, institutional, and structural-functional, each of which allows for the analysis of the role and potential of implementing practices and mechanisms of decentralization to enhance the effectiveness of public management during large-scale crises. It has been determined that the war has already inflicted colossal damage on the country’s economy, the overcoming of which is impossible without the implementation of flexible management practices, further redistribution of resources in favor of communities and regions, and the attraction of donor assistance and investments for recovery. Decentralization facilitates targeted resource use and allows for attracting investments for specific projects that will aid the development of communities and regions. On the other hand, decentralization tools enable local and regional problems to be addressed more promptly. The positive impact of decentralization on government bodies has been demonstrated in terms of their responsiveness to new challenges and threats posed by the war. It has been noted that the success of decentralization depends on the level of civic engagement: the degree of citizen involvement in decision-making, public initiatives, and so on. The main promising directions of decentralization have been identified, which should ensure the development of both territorial communities and regions, as well as promote the attraction of investment for post-war recovery. All of this is intended to enhance the resilience of Ukrainian regions and promote sustainable post-war development.
References
Schneider, А. (2003). Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, (38), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686198
Rondinelli, D. A. (2006). Decentralization and Development. In A. S. Huque, & H. Zafarullah (Eds.), International Development Governance (pp. 391–404). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15747
Mookherjee, D. P. (2015). Political Decentralization. Annual Review of Economics, (7), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115527
Korkushko, O. N., & Kushnir, L. A. (2019). Detsentralizatsiia v Ukraini: naslidky ta perspektyvy [Decentralization in Ukraine: Consequences and prospects]. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia, 3(20), 91–96. https://www.easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/journal/20_2019/15.pdf (in Ukrainian)
Kosach, I. A., & Kulyk, O. S. (2022). Detsentralizatsiia v Ukraini: tendentsii ta problemni aspekty [Decentralization in Ukraine: Trends and problems]. Problems of Modern Transformations. Series: Law, Public Management and Administration, 2(11), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.54929/pmtl-issue2-2021-11 (in Ukrainian)
Stoiko, O. M., Kresina, I. O., & Kresin, O. V. (2020). Vidrodzhennia postkonfliktnykh terytorii: svitovyi dosvid i Ukraina [Revival of post-conflict territories: world experience and Ukraine]. Instytut derzhavy i prava imeni V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy. https://jurkniga.ua/contents/vidrodzhennya-postkonfliktnikh-teritoriy-svitoviy-dosvid-i-ukraina.pdf (in Ukrainian)
Dzvinchuk, D., Hladii, V., Popovych, V., & Petrenko, V. (2023). About expedient changes in the management of strategic development of the regions of Ukraine in the conditions of war (on the example of the Ivano-Frankivsk region). Public Administration and Regional Development, (20), 398–422. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.20.06 (in Ukrainian)
Ismailov, A. (2024). Novitni stratehii rozvytku rehioniv: perekhid vid tsentralizovanoho do detsentralizovanoho upravlinnia [Modern development strategies for regions: Transition from centralized to decentralized governance]. Journal of Strategic Economic Research, 2(19), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.30857/2786-5398.2024.2.10 (in Ukrainian)
Dorosh, U. (2023). Detsentralizatsiia derzhavnoho upravlinnia yak zasib rehionalnoho rozvytku [Decentralization of state administration as a means of regional development] [Doctoral dissertation, Lviv Polytechnic National University]. https://lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/2023/radaphd/25856/disertaciya-dorosh-um.pdf (in Ukrainian)
Tiebout, C. (1976). A pure theory of local expenditures. Jornal Politicsl Economy, (64), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
Nyzhnyk, N. R. (Ed.). (1997). Derzhavne upravlinnia v Ukraini: tsentralizatsiia i detsentralizatsiia [Public administration in Ukraine: centralization and decentralization]. Ukrainian Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. http://surl.li/hvouiv (in Ukrainian)
Kovbasiuk, Yu. V., Troshchynskyi, V. P., & Surmina, Yu. P. (2010). Entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk z derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Public Administration]. National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. http://surl.li/kefjyd (in Ukrainian)
Lynov, K. O. (2001). Tsentralizatsiia, detsentralizatsiia ta neliniinist u derzhavnomu upravlinni [Centralization, decentralization and non-linearity in public administration]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
Malynovskyi, V. Ya. (2005). Slovnyk terminiv i poniat z derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Dictionary of terms and concepts from public administration]. Centre for the Promotion of Institutional Development of the Civil Service. https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/8477 (in Ukrainian)
Matviienko, A. S. (2010). Polityko-pravovi zasady detsentralizatsii vlady v konteksti administratyvnoi reformy v Ukraini [Political and legal principles of decentralization of power in the context of administrative reform in Ukraine]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. V. M. Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
Myerson, R. (2014). Constitutional structures for a strong democracy: considerations on the government of Pakistan. World Development, (53), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.005
Wade, R. (1997). How infrastructure agencies motivate staff: canal irrigation in India and the Republic of Korea. In A. Mody (Ed.), Infrastructure Strategies in East Asia: The Untold Story (pp. 109–127). The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/510051468774847688/pdf/multi-page.pdf
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2000). Capture and governance at local and national levels. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.135
Kuchuk, A. M. (2022). Detsentralizatsiia: zahalnoteoretychnyi aspekt [Decentralization: A general theoretical aspect]. In Materialy naukovo-praktychnoho kruhloho stolu “Krashchi praktyky detsentralizatsii: dosvid krain YeS dlia Ukrainy” [Materials of the scientific and practical round table ‘Best practices of decentralisation: Experience of EU countries for Ukraine’] (pp. 37–39). Sumy State University. http://surl.li/icjupt (in Ukrainian)
Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine On Approval of the State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027 No. 695 (2020). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/695-2020-%D0%BF#Text (in Ukrainian)
The Law of Ukraine On the Legal Regime of Martial Law No. 389-VIII (2015). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19#Text (in Ukrainian)
Mykoliuk, A. V. (2022). Robota orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia pid chas voiennoho stanu [Functioning of local governments during martial law]. Таuridа Scientific Herald. Series: Public Management and Administration, (2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.32851/tnv-pub.2022.2.9 (in Ukrainian)
KSE. (12 February 2024). $155 billion – the total amount of damages caused to Ukraine’s infrastructure due to the war, as of January 2024. Kyiv School of Economics. http://surl.li/zgwpsp
Ukrinform. (2024). Vtraty vid viiny – maizhe $500 miliardiv: Shmyhal nazvav naibilsh postrazhdali sektory ekonomiky [osses from the war - almost $500 billion: Shmyhal named the most affected sectors of the economy]. Ukrinform. http://surl.li/xujcjx (in Ukrainian)
Mygal, M. (2024). Relokatsiia biznesu v umovakh viiny: u yaki rehiony pereizhdzhaiut pidpryiemstva. Doslidzhennia Instytutu analityky ta relokatsii [Relocation of business in the conditions of war: To which regions are companies moving]. Institute of Analytics and Advocacy. http://surl.li/rwoskc (in Ukrainian)
Sira, O., & Filippova, O. (2024). Morski porty Ukrainy: potuzhnosti, vtraty, perspektyvy [Sea ports of Ukraine: Capacities, losses, prospects]. Ilko Kucheriv “Democratic Initiatives” Foundation. https://dif.org.ua/article/morski-porti-ukraini-potuzhnosti-vtrati-perspektivi (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Oleg Kulinich, Oleksandr Popov