Abstract
Decades of sales leadership research have concentrated on comparing transformational and transactional styles, producing evidence that consistently favors the former without specifying when, for which teams, or under what market conditions each approach generates the strongest revenue outcomes. A classification framework that maps leadership style to team developmental context is absent from the literature, and the link between manager behavior at the individual interaction level and measurable organizational revenue results remains underspecified. Examined here is how leadership strategies in sales management affect team motivation, salesperson productivity, and organizational revenue growth across varying sales contexts, drawing on a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025, supplemented by industry survey data from Salesforce, LinkedIn, Gallup, and Objective Management Group. Findings indicate that leadership style effectiveness is contingent on three interacting factors: team developmental phase, sales transaction complexity, and competitive market volatility. Coaching-based leadership operationalization shows the strongest documented revenue association, with consistent managerial coaching linked to 28% revenue gains and effective coaching to 43% gains in assessed populations. A Leadership Style Contingency Model is proposed, classifying style-context pairings by expected performance outcomes. Study novelty consists of reframing sales leadership from a style-selection problem into a context-matching problem, providing sales managers a structured basis for leadership adaptation.
References
1. Anuar, N. et al. (2025). Transformational leadership and firm performance: a systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, (14). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00476-x
2. Bullemore Campbell, J. (2024). Navigating Leadership in Sales: The Impact of Narcissistic Leadership on Sales Performance and Team Dynamics. International Review of Management and Marketing, 14(3). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4830064
3. Cekmecelioglu, H. G., Ozcan, M., Balkas, J., & Cam, F. B. C. (2025). Transformational or Transactional? A Comparison of the Effects of Leadership Styles on Firm Performance and Innovation. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251367515
4. Coimbra, J., & Proenca, T. (2023). Managerial coaching and sales performance: the influence of salesforce approaches and organisational demands. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(10), 3076–3094. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2021-0620
5. Gallup. (2023). State of the Global Workplace Report. Gallup Press. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx
6. IJCRT. (2025). The Impact of Transactional and Transformational Leadership on Employee Job Satisfaction and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. IJCRT, 13(4). https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2504329.pdf
7. Kulat, G., Kakwani, D., Shah, N., & Naidu, K. (2023). A Critical Study on Impact of Leadership Style of Sales Managers on Performance of Sales Teams. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(6), e01423. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.1423
8. LinkedIn. (2022). State of Sales Report. LinkedIn Sales Solutions. https://business.linkedin.com/sales-solutions/state-of-sales
9. Management Science (2024). Employee Performance and Mental Well-Being: The Mitigating Effects of Transformational Leadership During Crisis. Management Science, 70(8). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03285
10. Mindtickle. (2024). State of Revenue Productivity. Mindtickle Research. https://www.mindtickle.com/blog/11-sales-coaching-tips-and-techniques-to-improve-sales-mindtickle/
11. Murphy, W. H., & Anderson, R. E. (2020). Transformational leadership effects on salespeople’s attitudes, striving, and performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(5), 959–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00724-3
12. Objective Management Group. (2024). Sales Coaching and Revenue Impact Assessment: Findings from 2.5 Million Sales Professional Evaluations. https://www.kurlanassociates.com/understanding-the-sales-force/2024/the-data-what-percentage-of-salespeople-are-really-coachable/
13. Rao, S. (2025). The future of leadership: Can “Transfor-sactional” management drive sustainable success? Social Sciences and Humanities Open, (12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.100958
14. Rapp, A., Agnihotri, R., & Baker, T. (2021). Organizational innovativeness and firm performance: Does sales management matter? Industrial Marketing Management, (93), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.02.005
15. Rocío Rodríguez Herrera, Mornay Roberts-Lombard, Nils M. Høgevold, Svensson Goran. (2024). Proposing a sales performance motivational framework for B2B sellers in services firms. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 30(1), 100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2023.100235
16. Salesforce. (2023). State of Sales Report, 6th Edition. Salesforce Research. https://www.salesforce.com/resources/research-reports/state-of-sales/
17. Virtue Market Research. (2023). Sales Coaching Software Market Report 2023–2030. https://virtuemarketresearch.com/report/sales-coaching-software-market
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Iryna Chaika