THE IMPACT OF THE QUALITY OF LABORATORY CONTROL OF GRAIN ON THE FORMATION OF EXPORT PRICES AND DISCOUNTS: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
PDF

Keywords

quality control
infestation
grain quality
mycotoxins
ISO standards
GAFTA
FOSFA
Codex Alimentarius
grain export
econometric model
FOB

How to Cite

Nesterenko, S. (2025). THE IMPACT OF THE QUALITY OF LABORATORY CONTROL OF GRAIN ON THE FORMATION OF EXPORT PRICES AND DISCOUNTS: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS . Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, (11). https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.11.05

Abstract

The stability of grain quality parameters is a crucial prerequisite for ensuring the competitive position of domestic exports in the world market. The main objective of the study is to conduct an economic analysis of the impact of effective laboratory quality control of grain, focusing on pest infestation levels and other important quality parameters, on the determination of export prices and related discounts under free-on-board (FOB) contracts. The study intends to propose new methodological approaches and an econometric forecasting model aimed at increasing the accuracy of quality assessment and reducing economic risks for grain exporters. A variety of methodologies were used to facilitate this broad empirical study. These include standardized quality control protocols that comply with international standards, such as ISO, GAFTA, FOSFA and Codex Alimentarius, as well as rapid analytical methods (e.g., LFA, NIR/FT-NIR, machine vision, HSI) and advanced laboratory analyses (e.g., LC-MS/MS, HPLC, PCR). This is complemented by sophisticated econometric modeling. The scope of this study includes a systematic analysis of how critical attributes, namely moisture content, protein level, gluten content, vitreousness, impurity percentage, contamination level, and mycotoxin concentration, affect the formation of price discounts and potential economic losses incurred by exporters. The study uses both linear and log-linear regression models to predict the predicted FOB price and quantify discount adjustments, all dependent on laboratory-verified quality indicators. Finally, the authors advocate an integrated quality control paradigm. This approach combines standardized sampling protocols, automated inspection systems, and multi-level analytical algorithms to increase the accuracy of the assessment and reduce financial losses. Such a robust framework is designed to strengthen the competitiveness of Ukrainian grain exports in the global market.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.11.05
PDF

References

1. Do Nascimento Miguel, J. (2024). Returns to quality in rural agricultural markets: Evidence from wheat markets in Ethiopia. Journal of Development Economics, (171), 103336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103336

2. FAO (2024). CODEX International Food Standards. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/en/

3. FOSFA (2025). Contracts. Oils. Seeds. Fats. FOSFA International. https://www.fosfa.org/contracts/

4. GAFTA (2024). Sampling and Analysis. GAFTA. https://www.gafta.com/trade-policy/food-and-feed-safety/sampling-and-analysis/

5. ICC (2025). International Association for Cereal Science and Technology – Standards overview. International Association for Cereal Science and Technology – Home. https://icc.or.at/icc-standards/standards-overview

6. ISO (1995). ISO 5223:1995 Test sieves for cereals. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/11225.html

7. ISO (2006). ISO 21415-3:2006. Wheat and wheat flour – Gluten content. Part 3: Determination of dry gluten from wet gluten by an oven drying method. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/35864.html

8. ISO (2009a). ISO 24333:2009 Cereals and cereal products – Sampling. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/42165.html

9. ISO (2009b). ISO 659:2009 Oilseeds – Determination of oil content (Reference method). ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/43169.html

10. ISO (2009c). ISO 7971-1:2009 Cereals – Determination of bulk density, called mass per hectolitre. Part 1: Reference method. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/44524.html

11. ISO (2010). ISO 520:2010 Cereals and pulses – Determination of the mass of 1 000 grains. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/52270.html

12. ISO (2016). ISO 16634-2:2016 Food products – Determination of the total nitrogen content by combustion according to the Dumas principle and calculation of the crude protein content. Part 2: Cereals, pulses and milled cereal products. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/66661.html

13. ISO (2017a). ISO 12099:2017 Animal feeding stuffs, cereals and milled cereal products – Guidelines for the application of near infrared spectrometry. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/67352.html

14. ISO (2017b). ISO 18787:2017 Foodstuffs – Determination of water activity. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/63379.html

15. ISO (2017c). ISO 21415-2:2015 Wheat and wheat flour – Gluten content Part 2: Determination of wet gluten and gluten index by mechanical means. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/62221.html

16. ISO (2019a). ISO 7971-2:2019 Cereals – Determination of bulk density, called mass per hectolitre. Part 2: Method of traceability for measuring instruments through reference to the international standard instrument. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/70016.html

17. ISO (2019b). ISO 7971-2019. Cereals – Determination of bulk density, called mass per hectolitre. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/70016.html

18. ISO (2019c). ISO 7971-3:2019 Cereals – Determination of bulk density, called mass per hectolitre Part 3: Routine method. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/70015.html

19. ISO (2024). ISO 712-1:2024 Cereals and cereal products – Determination of moisture content. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/85395.html

20. ISO (2025). ISO 6639-2:2025 Cereals and pulses – Determination of hidden insect infestation Part 2: Sampling. ISO – International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/85402.html

21. Miao, Y., Sun, J., Liu, R., Huang, J., & Sheng, J. (2025). Bridging the Quality-Price Gap: Unlocking Consumer Premiums for High-Quality Rice in China. Foods, 14(7), 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14071184

22. Nesterenko, S. (2025). Adaptation of Ukrainian grain quality and safety standards to international requirements based on the example of implementing the HACCP system. Science and Technology Today, 6(47), 1458–1474. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2025-6(47)-1458-1474

23. Nesterenko, S. A. (2025). Economic efficiency of implementing SMBHP at grain elevators in the context of international export. Current Issues in Economic Sciences, (13). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16253930

24. Nesterenko, S. A. (2025). Innovative approaches to wheat standardization based on the analysis of global value chains. Scientific Notes of Lviv University of Business and Law, (45), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16706763

25. Nesterenko, S., & Kryvokhyzha, Y. (2023). Harmonization of Ukrainian wheat quality standards with codex requirements for integration into the global market. International scientific journal "Internauka". Series: "Economic Sciences", 8(100). https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2025-8-11287

26. Nesterenko, S. A., & Prykhodko, V. O. (2025). Agronomy as science and practice: Modern approaches. Tavria Scientific Bulletin, (144), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-0099.2025.144.19

27. Parkhomenko, O. S., & Kuleshova, O. S. (2024). Determinants of grain exports in Ukraine: A quantitative assessment of the impact of key factors. Agrosvit, (20), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2024.20.117

28. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2024). On approval of the Methods of sampling and laboratory research (tests) for determining the levels of mycotoxins in food products for the purposes of state control. Official website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1007-24/en/ed20240531/sp:side:max25#Text

29. Roberts, S., Brooks, K., Nogueira, L., & Walters, C. G. (2022). The role of quality characteristics in pricing hard red winter wheat. Food Policy, (108), 102246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102246

30. SSPP FCPU (2018). Sampling methods for determining maximum permissible levels of mycotoxins in food products for the purposes of state control. State Service for the Protection and Promotion of Food and Consumer Protection of Ukraine. https://share.google/EpWGH9Hll8UHHvsiF

31. SSSU (2025). Foreign trade in certain types of goods by countries of the world. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Economic statistics. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2025/zd/e_iovt/arh_iovt2025.htm

32. Svitovyi, O., Kirdan, O., & Gechbaia, B. (2022). Organizational and economic principles of creating added value in grain production. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(3), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.03.10

33. Tilse, M. J., Bishop, T. F. A., & Filippi, P. (2025). Quantity vs. quality: does wheat grain yield or protein contenthave a greater opportunity for precision management? Precision Agriculture, 26(67). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10263-z

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Sofia Nesterenko