MANAGEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AS A MECHANISM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION IN THE CHERNIHIV REGION
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

public administration
project management
project development
project approach in managing the development of territories and regions
development of management decisions
monitoring and evaluation of the project
development of society and sustainable development strategy

How to Cite

Mirko, N. (2025). MANAGEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AS A MECHANISM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION IN THE CHERNIHIV REGION. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, (9). https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.9.18

Abstract

The extremely complex conditions in which Ukraine finds itself due to the ongoing military conflict within its territory require increased efficiency in the use of resources available in the regions, particularly in border areas. The implementation of state policies, including regional development policy, can be improved through the realization of regional projects oriented toward the principles of sustainable development. In this context, the issue of implementing enhanced models for managing key directions of regional policy, including mechanisms for regional development integration, becomes particularly significant. This underscores the scientific importance of the chosen research topic and contributes to achieving ecological stability and fostering sustainable development in the Chernihiv region. Research in the field of public administration of regional development provides a comprehensive and systematic understanding of the problems and challenges faced by regions, particularly regarding the implementation of projects oriented toward sustainable development and environmental protection. Contemporary public administration is increasingly focused on achieving sustainable development goals, taking into account economic, social, and environmental dimensions. To effectively address these tasks, it is proposed to develop a methodology for managing regional projects based on economic, social, budgetary, and environmental components, using multi-criteria optimization methods. The implementation of such management methodologies in the Chernihiv region contributes to increasing the efficiency of administrative processes, ensures high-quality analysis and forecasting of socio-economic processes, improves interaction between authorities and citizens, and enhances transparency and accountability in decision-making. A crucial aspect of modern regional governance is the integration of research results with the practice of regional development management. In the context of globalization, there is a need for systematic analysis and adaptation of best international practices in project management, particularly those oriented toward the region’s environmental sector. Under contemporary conditions, characterized by increasing socio-economic and environmental challenges, governance models are becoming more adaptive and flexible, aimed at timely responses to changes in economic, social, and ecological environments. Achieving sustainable regional development requires a close combination of academic research with practical application of knowledge in the management of regional projects. The results of such studies can be used to enhance resource conservation efficiency, develop a positive social and institutional image of the region, provide social guarantees and benefits, and create competitive advantages in the regional development of the studied territory.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.9.18
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Andriyiv, N., Pushak, H., Petrukha, N., Kokhan, V., & Shtangret, I. (2022). Transformation of threats to demographic security and sustainable development of the region due to increased military actions. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(7), 2221–2227. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170722

2. Białk-Wolf, A., Lubowiecki-Vikuk, A., Dryglas, D., Illing, K., & Jędrzejczyk, T. (2025). Developing a health region in the context of sustainable development – An attempt at conceptualization. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 17(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-01-2025-0019

3. Corsi, S., & Bianchi, L. (2024). Reverse innovation for global sustainable development: A conceptualisation. International Journal of Development Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDI-08-2024-0200

4. Gilcher, D. (2024). Heuristics in the wild: Exploring fund manager decisions through the COVID pandemic. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 16(5), 833–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-09-2021-0149

5. Gáspár, J., Gubová, K., Hideg, E., Jagaciak, M. P., Mackova, L., Márton, A., Rafał, W., Sacio-Szymańska, A., & Šerá Komlossyová, E. (2023). Trends shaping sustainable post-pandemic development of the V4 region in turbulent times until 2030. Foresight, 25(6), 861–877. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-10-2022-0135

6. Heymann, T., & Ebinger, F. (2025). Sustainable public procurement – a systemic intermediary facilitating SPP implementation in the European metropolitan region of Nuremberg. Journal of Public Procurement. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2024-0073

7. Klebel, T. (2025). Investigating patterns of knowledge production in research on three UN sustainable development goals. Online Information Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2023-0086

8. Lodhia, S., Crutzen, N., & Leong, S. (2025). The management, reporting and assurance of the Sustainable Development Goals in local government – an Australian case study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 33(7), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2025-2942

9. McGillivray, D., Walters, T., & Guillard, S. (2024). Place-based community events and resistance to territorial stigmatisation. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-01-2023-0010

10. Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Lancaster, G. (2024). Exploring the relationship between integrated marketing communications and decentralised organisational structure: A heuristics perspective. Qualitative Market Research, 25(2), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2021-0098

11. Osarenkhoe, A., & Fjellström, D. (2024). A cluster's internationalization as a catalyst for its innovation system's access to global markets. EuroMed Journal of Business, 19(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-11-2020-0127

12. Paola Scorrano, P., Borin, E., Thrassou, A., Cavallo, F., & Mastroleo, G. (2025). Knowledge sharing between businesses and stakeholders for systemic and sustainable regional development: Insights in the agri-food sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(4), 1278–1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2024-0517

13. Petrukha, S. V., Petrukha, N. M., Demydonok, I. A., & Tarasenko, M. I. (2022). Detsentralizatsiia ta stalyi rozvytok silskykh terytorii: dovoienne koordynuvannia system pryiniattia klasternykh rishen [Decentralization and sustainable development of rural areas: pre-war coordination of cluster decision-making systems]. In O. L. Haltsova (Ed.), Innovatsiino-investytsiinyi mekhanizm zabezpechennia konkurento-spromozhnosti krainy [Innovation and investment mechanism for ensuring the country’s competitiveness], (pp. 22–56). Lviv-Toruń: Liga-Press. https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-255-8-2 (in Ukrainian)

14. Sarabia-Sanchez, F. J., & Cerda-Bertomeu, M. J. (2018). Expert stakeholders’ expectations of how the public sector should act in place branding projects. Journal of Place Management and Development, 11(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-04-2016-0026

15. Sánchez-Vergara, J. I., Orel, M., Ferreira, V., & Rus, A. (2024). Bracing community in rural coworking: Emerging trends and categories. Journal of Place Management and Development, 17(3), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-06-2023-0065

16. State Environmental Inspectorate of Ukraine. (n.d.). Official web portal. https://www.dei.gov.ua/ (in Ukrainian)

17. Sum, K., Radło, M.-J., & Mackiewicz, M. (2023). The multilevel governance of financial instruments in regional development policy: The case of Poland. Central European Management Journal, 31(3), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-05-2022-0071

18. Tuesta-Tapia, A. C., Vázquez-Sánchez, A., & Amador-Hidalgo, L. (2024). Excellence in the management of local action groups: An empirical investigation of critical success factors. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2024-0058

19. Uhodnikova, O. (2023). Publichnyi marketynh u systemi staloho rozvytku terytorialnykh hromad: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi aspekt [Public marketing in the system of sustainable development of territorial communities: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Naukovi pratsi Mizhrehionalnoi Akademii upravlinnia personalom – Scientific Works of the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, 5(71), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2023-5(71)-14 (in Ukrainian)

20. Uhodnikova, O. I. (2024). Suchasna paradyhma rehionalnoho marketynhu u rozvytku skladnykh sotsialno-ekonomichnykh system [Modern paradigm of regional marketing in the development of complex socio-economic systems]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia” – Scientific Notes of the National University “Ostroh Academy”, 33(61), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.25264/2311-5149-2024-33(61)-4-9 (in Ukrainian)

21. Tiffany, H., & Ebinger, F. (2025). Sustainable public procurement – a systemic intermediary facilitating SPP implementation in the European metropolitan region of Nuremberg. Journal of Public Procurement. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2024-0073

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Nataliia Mirko