Abstract
The article explores the role of citizen cultural diplomacy as a tool for promoting Ukraine’s foreign policy goals in the face of constant geopolitical challenges. The transformation of cultural diplomacy from a state-centric model to an inclusive one is examined, where non-state actors play a key role: artists, activists, and public organizations. This paradigm shift reflects the democratization of international interaction, where non-state initiatives complement official narratives. The mechanisms of citizen cultural diplomacy are analyzed, in particular its decentralized, networked nature, rapid adaptability to crisis events, and the use of digital platforms to disseminate cultural content. Examples of successful initiatives that contributed to the formation of a positive image of Ukraine as a democratic nation are given. The impact of citizen diplomacy on Ukraine’s foreign policy is studied (countering Russian propaganda, increasing cultural visibility, attracting international assistance). At the same time, problems are noted (lack of systemic coordination with state institutions, bureaucratic barriers, limited resources in wartime conditions). For the effective integration of citizen diplomacy into national strategies, institutional reform, transparent dialogue between the state and the public, as well as the ethical use of digital technologies to counter disinformation, are necessary. The role of international partnerships and non-governmental actors in the preservation of cultural heritage and the analysis of media discourse is highlighted. It is noted that the lack of high-quality Ukrainian-language media for the diaspora and refugees creates information gaps that reduce the effectiveness of cultural diplomacy. It is established that citizen cultural diplomacy has become a strategic addition to traditional diplomacy, strengthening the “soft power” of Ukraine. However, to realize its potential, systemic changes are needed: institutionalization of coordination mechanisms, support for digital innovations, and strengthening legal and cultural integration. Ukraine’s experience demonstrates that citizen diplomacy can become the basis of international interaction in times of crisis, but requires a balance between the autonomy of the public sector and strategic planning at the state level.
References
1. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.
2. Lutsyshyn, H., & Honcharuk, A. (2017). Osoblyvosti rozvytku kulturnoi dyplomatii Ukrainy v suchasnykh umovakh [Features of the development of cultural diplomacy of Ukraine in modern conditions]. Humanitarian Vision, 3(1), 25–30. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/hv_2017_3_1_7 (in Ukrainian)
3. Kononenko, V., & Komarova, T. (2024). Tsyfrova dyplomatiia yak zasib stratehichnoi komunikatsii derzhavy [Digital diplomacy as a means of strategic communication of the state]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia “Pytannia politolohii” – Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Issues of Political Science”, (45), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2024-45-02 (in Ukrainian)
4. Rudniev, A. O., Malovan, Yu. H., & Arseniuk, M. S. (2024). Kulturna dyplomatiia yak instrument formuvannia imidzhu Ukrainy [Cultural diplomacy as a tool for shaping Ukraine’s image]. Rehionalni studii – Regional Studies, (37), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2024.37.11 (in Ukrainian)
5. Eurobarometer. (2023). Opytuvannia Yevrobarometra pokazalo, shcho yevropeitsi prodovzhuiut rishyche pidtrymuvaty Ukrainu [Eurobarometer survey showed that Europeans continue to strongly support Ukraine]. https://surl.li/uxjjmy (in Ukrainian)
6. Suchkov, D. (2023). Media-mystetstvo yak trend suchasnoi audiovizualnoi kultury [Media art as a trend of modern audiovisual culture]. Ukrainska kultura: mynule, suchasne, shliakhy rozvytku – Ukrainian culture: past, present, ways of development, (47), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.v47i.727 (in Ukrainian)
7. Tereshchuk, V. (2019). Cultural Diplomacy as a Tool of Ukraine’s Foreign Policy: Institutional Dimension. Historia i polityka, 35(28), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2019.015
8. Ukrainskyi instytut pidtrymaie visim proiektiv z ukrainistyky u shesty krainakh [Ukrainian Institute will support eight Ukrainian studies projects in six countries]. (2025). Ukrainian Institute. https://ui.org.ua/sectors/ukrayinskyj-instytut-pidtrymaye-visim-proyektiv-z-ukrayinistyky-u-shesty-krayinah/. (in Ukrainian)
9. Uchast Ukrainy u diialnosti YNESKO [Ukraine’s participation in UNESCO activities]. (2024). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. https://mfa.gov.ua/mizhnarodni-vidnosini/yunesko/uchast-ukrayini-u-diyalnosti-yunesko. (in Ukrainian)
10. Protydiia naratyvam rosiiskoi propahandy pro Ukrainu v zakhidnykh media [Countering narratives of Russian propaganda about Ukraine in Western media]. (2023). LMF. https://lnk.bio/LMF_Networks. (in Ukrainian)
11. Ukraine Situation: Regional Refugee Response Plan 2025–2026. (2024). UNHCR. https://data.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/113657.
12. Ukrainski media, stavlennia ta dovira u 2024 r. [Ukrainian media, attitudes and trust in 2024]. (2024). USAID. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kwsclr3Qm2QaqaIVv0_l4saWRFY_NXWb/view. (in Ukrainian)
13. Drach, V. V. (2024). Kulturna dyplomatiia v umovakh hlobalnoho rozvytku suspilstv [Cultural diplomacy in conditions of global development of societies]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv – Bulletin of the National Academy of Management of Culture and Arts, (2), 33–38. http://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2024.308270 (in Ukrainian)
14. Kostyria, I. O., Shevchenko, M. I., & Yanchenko, N. M. (2021). Kulturna dyplomatiia yak identyfikator derzhavy v konteksti hlobalizatsii [Cultural diplomacy as a state identifier in the context of globalization]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv – Bulletin of the National Academy of Management of Culture and Arts, (4), 20–25. https://journals.uran.ua/visnyknakkkim/article/view/250236/247668 (in Ukrainian)
15. Mytsyk, L. M. (2022). Cultural diplomacy as a tool for shaping the international image of Ukraine. Literatura ta kultura Polissia – Literature and Culture of Polissia, (105), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.31654/2520-6966-2021-15i-105-70-84
16. Dubovyk, N., & Shylo, O. (2023). Kulturna dyplomatiia yak instrument mizhnarodnoi komunikatsii Ukrainy [Cultural diplomacy as a tool for Ukraine’s international communication]. Molodyi vchenyi – Young Scientist, 4(116), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2023-4-116-14 (in Ukrainian)
17. Stasevska, O. A., & Malanchuk, I. I. (2021). Kulturna dyplomatiia: symbioz kulturnoho ta pravovoho potentsialu [Cultural diplomacy: a symbiosis of cultural and legal potential]. Pravo ta innovatsii – Law and Innovations, (1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2021-1(33)-13 (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Oleh Holoborodko