Abstract
The article analyzes the role of the EU Eastern Partnership Initiative in supporting local self-government and decentralization reforms in Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia. It examines the peculiarities of implementing local government reforms in the “Associated Trio” countries. The Eastern Partnership Index is used to examine the dynamics of the country’s convergence with EU standards in the field of local self-government. It has been found that Ukraine and Moldova are showing positive dynamics in the implementation of EU standards and norms in this area in 2021–2025, while Georgia is seeing a slowdown in reforms. The features of the EU’s Eastern Partnership Initiative were analyzed, and it was noted that this Eastern policy is aimed at bringing the countries of the region closer to the EU, their democratization, economic development, implementation of reforms, strengthening economic stability, good governance, and strengthening people-to-people contacts. The internal and external challenges that hinder EU support for decentralization reforms in the “Associated Trio” countries are identified. In particular, the biggest challenges include the lack of a unified EU position on the countries of the region, the slowdown of local self-government reforms by the countries themselves, corruption, geopolitical challenges in the region, the factor of the Russian Federation, and the decline in the level of democracy. The level of local self-government reforms implementation in the countries of the “Associated Trio” was studied, and it was found that Ukraine is the most reformed in this area, while Georgia has the lowest level of implementation. Recommendations are made on strengthening the role of the EU and its Eastern Partnership instrument in the implementation of local self-government reforms in Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova. The prospects for the integration of the “Associated Trio” countries into EU standards in the field of local self-government are highlighted and three scenarios are identified.
References
1. ALDA Europe. (2024). Public Administration and Local Governments Reforms in Eastern Partnership Countries. ALDA Europe. https://www.alda-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/163-policy-paper-par.pdf
2. Astramowicz-Leyk, T., & Turchyn, Y. (2023). The European Union’s Eastern partnership initiative under the polyhybrid aggression of the Russian Federation. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 13(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.31648/pw.8455
3. Baimuratov, M., Kofman, B., Bobrovnyk, D., Dzeveliuk, M., & Dzeveliuk, A. (2023). Analysis of the practical aspects of local self-government in the context of the functioning of territorial communities in Ukraine. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i8.1522
4. Bentzen, N., & Przetacznik, J. (2021). Eastern Partnership 3.0 Principles, priorities, and prospects. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2020/651966/EPRS_IDA(2020)651966_EN.pdf
5. Bilotserkivska, O. (2024). Decentralization reform in Ukraine and the Eastern Partnership Initiative: cooperation in the development of local democracies. Bulletin of Lviv University. Series: Philosophy and Political Science Studies, (54), 73–182. https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2024.54.20
6. Chichinadze, B. (2020). Characteristics of local self-government development in Georgia. Food Industry Economics, 12(3), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.15673/fie.v12i3.1820
7. Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. (2025). Eastern Partnership Index. Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. https://eap-csf.eu/what-we-do/eap-index/
8. Ermurachi, A. (2021). Administrative reform in Moldova: everyone needs it, but no one is implementing it. Radio Free Europe. https://ipre.md/2021/12/28/reforma-administrativa-din-r-moldova-toata-lumea-are-nevoie-de-ea-dar-nimeni-nu-o-pune-in-practica-adrian-ermurachi-pentru-radio-europa-libera/
9. European Commission. (2025). Eastern Partnership. European Union Websites. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eastern-partnership_en
10. Gahler, M. (2021). Boosting the EU’s soft power in Eastern Partnership countries. European View, 20(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685821999847
11. Hoffman, K. (2017). Local government reforms in Georgia and their impact on state-society relations. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(5), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1417051
12. Kaunert, C. (2022). EU Eastern Parnership, Hybrid Warfare and Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Eucrim, (2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2022-011
13. Kaunert, C., & de Deus Pereira, J. (2023). EU Eastern Partnership, Ontological Security and EU- Ukraine/Russian warfare. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(4), 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2183182
14. Kustova, S., & Palamarchuk, T. (2025). Strengthening local self-government as a key vector of reforming Ukraine’s regional policy in the context of European Integration. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Public Administration, 22(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2025/22-3/14
15. Madyarbekova, A., Kilybayeva, P., Abildayev, A. & Suleimenova, G. (2025). Development of the Eastern Partnership Policy: Mechanism and Problems of Implementation. Politics in Central Europe, 21(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2025-0005
16. Schantl, A., Hochholdinger, N., Rücker, L., & Stafa, E. (2021). Decentralization and local public administration in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Platforma. https://platforma-dev.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Decentralisation-Reform-in-EaP-Preparing-for-the-Future.pdf
17. Tsebenko, O., Lukach, N., Zavada, Y., & Stadnichenko, O. (2022). Model for Assessing Development of E-Government in Eastern Partnership Countries. In N. Kryvinska, M. Greguš (Eds.), Developments in Information & Knowledge Management for Business Applications (Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 421, pp. 425–444). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97008-6_19
18. Turchyn, Ya, Ivasechko, O., & Tsebenko, O. (2023) The EU as a Promoter of Democracy in Eastern Partnership Countries. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 23(2), 144–167. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1201269
19. Turchyn, Ya., Ivaschenko, O., Tsebenko, O., Sukhorolska, I., & Roslon, D. (2022). Prospects for the development of the EU’s Eastern Partnership initiative in the context of geopolitical challenges. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House.
20. Uvarova, O. (2021). Decentralisation and Local Self-government in Eastern Partnership countries. Euneighbourseast. https://euneighbourseast.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/decentralisation-and-local-self-government-in-eastern-partnership-countries.pdf??%3Cfont%20color=
21. Zaitseva, M. (2022). Decentralization of public authority of Ukraine in the context of European Integration processes. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. International Relations, 56(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2292.2022/2-56/37-40
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Oleh Tsebenko, Bohdan Fedirko