Keywords
strategic positioning
electoral campaigns
post-pandemic period
media communications
digital platforms
public opinion
voter trust
How to Cite
Abstract
The article examines political image as a tool for strategic positioning in post-pandemic electoral campaigns. The main focus is on analyzing the impact of crisis conditions, media communications, and digital platforms on the formation and effectiveness of political leaders’ images in Europe and North America. Research aim: to determine how political image influences citizens’ electoral preferences in the post-pandemic period, identify effective strategies for its formation, and assess the role of media and social networks in building voter trust and support. The study is based on a comprehensive approach that includes content analysis of public speeches and media materials of political leaders, comparative analysis of post-pandemic electoral campaigns, analysis of sociological data and approval ratings, case studies (using Donald Trump in the USA and Angela Merkel’s government in Germany as examples), and synthesis of data from various sources. The study revealed that political image becomes a key factor for campaign success under crisis conditions. Candidates who demonstrated competence, transparency, and effective crisis management received consistently positive audience perception and increased approval ratings. Active use of media and digital platforms enhances the influence of image on public opinion, builds trust, and legitimizes political authority. Comparative analysis of campaigns in different countries confirmed the universality of these strategies in Europe and North America. In the post-pandemic period, political image is a critical tool for strategic positioning, shaping voter behavior and determining electoral outcomes. Its effective construction and management are an integral part of modern political management. The study confirms that integrating digital technologies and media strategies into image formation becomes a key factor for candidates’ competitive advantage. Furthermore, the results can be used to develop practical recommendations for improving the effectiveness of electoral campaigns in various political contexts.
References
1. Akaiomova, A. (2009). Politychnyi imidzh ta osnovni yoho kharakterystyky [Political image and its main characteristics]. Political Management, (5), 29–35. https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/akaiomova_politychnyi.pdf (in Ukrainian)
2. Dankevych, V., Zakharina, O., & Pokhodenko, V. (2021). Henezys idei brendynhu yak instrumentu publichnoho upravlinnia [The genesis of the idea of branding as a tool of public administration]. Derzhavne upravlinnya: udoskonalennya ta rozvytok, (2). http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156-2021.2.7 (in Ukrainian)
3. Farkas, X., & Bene, M. (2021). Images, politicians, and social media: Patterns and effects of politicians’ image-based political communication strategies on social media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220959553
4. Fesun, H. (2019). Imidzh politychnoho lidera: deiaki sotsialno-psykholohichni aspekty [Political leader’s image: some social-psychological aspects]. http://surl.li/swski (in Ukrainian)
5. Guzmán, F., & Sierra, V. (2009). A political candidate’s brand image scale: Are political candidates brands? Journal of Brand Management, 17(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2009.19
6. Ipsos. (2020). Views of Trump’s handling of COVID at all time low. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/views-trumps-handling-covid-all-time-low
7. Jones, J. M. (2020). Trump approval rating rises amid response to coronavirus. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/24/trump-approval-rating-rises-amid-response-to-coronavirus.html
8. Jurkowitz, M. (2020). Majority of Americans disapprove of Trump’s COVID 19 messaging, though large partisan gaps persist. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/09/15/majority-of-americans-disapprove-of-trumps-covid-19-messaging-though-large-partisan-gaps-persist/
9. Lavrenko, O. (1997). Problemy formuvannia imidzhu kandydata v deputaty [Problems of forming the candidate’s image]. In: Problems of Political Psychology (pp. 331–332). Kyiv: ADEF-Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
10. Lavrentii, A. (2019). Imidzh yak predmet naukovoho analizu [Image as a subject of scientific analysis]. Bulletin of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. Series: Public Administration, (3), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.36030/2310-2837-3(94)-2019-30-38 (in Ukrainian)
11. Maidanskyi, M., & Zienkin, V. (2025). Antykryzovi stratehii formuvannia politychnoho imidzhu v umovakh viiny: ukrainskyi dosvid 2022–2024 [Anti-crisis strategies for forming a political image in wartime: Ukrainian experience 2022–2024]. Public Management and Policy, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.4.10 (in Ukrainian)
12. Moss, S. E., Kessler, S. R., Martinko, M. J., & Mackey, J. D. (2022). The Relationship Between Follower Affect for President Trump and the Adoption of COVID-19 Personal Protective Behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211010765
13. Pich, C., Armannsdottir, G., Dean, D., Spry, L., & Jain, V. (2020). Problematizing the presentation and reception of political brands: The strategic and operational nature of the political brand alignment model. European Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 190–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2018-0187
14. Rovenskyi, A. (2020, December 22). Top ranking of world politicians: winners and losers of 2020. Interfax‑Ukraine. https://interfax.com.ua/news/blog/711726.html (in Ukrainian)
15. Sadomska, B. (2020, November 9). Ryativne kolo dlia Merkel: yak pandemiia dopomohla vidnovyty doviru do kanclerky FRN [A lifeline for Merkel: how the pandemic helped restore trust in the German chancellor]. ADASTRA. https://adastra.org.ua/blog/ryativne-kolo-dlya-merkel-yak-pandemiya-dopomogla-vidnoviti-doviru-do-kanclerki-frn?utm_source (in Ukrainian)
16. Scammell, M. (2015). Politics and image. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4447.6165
17. Sviderska, O., Naumenko, D., & Androsov, O. (2025). Praktyky stratehichnykh komunikatsii u formuvanni obrazu viiskovo-politychnoho kerivnytstva derzhavy v umovakh rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny [Practices of strategic communications in shaping the image of military-political leadership of the state during the Russian-Ukrainian war]. Actual Issues of Philosophy, (55), 306–311. https://doi.org/10.32782/apfs.v055.2025.46 (in Ukrainian)
18. Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ivan Maidanskyi, Mykhailo Zienkin