EVOLUTION AND CURRENT STATE OF UKRAINE’S INTERNATIONAL IMAGE IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS
PDF

Keywords

state image
nation branding
public diplomacy
strategic communications
social media
cultural diplomacy
reputation indices

How to Cite

Denysiuk, O. (2025). EVOLUTION AND CURRENT STATE OF UKRAINE’S INTERNATIONAL IMAGE IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS. Public Management and Policy, (10(14). https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.10.15

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of Ukraine’s international image from 1991 to 2025, accounting for political cycles, wartime challenges, and the digital transformation of communications. The relevance of the study is determined by the radical transformation of Ukraine’s global image amid ongoing information wars, hybrid threats, and the growing role of reputational capital in public governance. The research reveals that a positive state image functions not only as a symbolic asset but also as an indicator of the effectiveness of political institutions, the transparency of communication, and the government’s ability to sustain trust during crises. The purpose of the study is to analyze the evolution of Ukraine’s national brand, identify key factors influencing its development, and substantiate an operational framework for its further enhancement. Methodologically, the paper adopts an interdisciplinary approach that integrates theories of nation branding, public and cultural diplomacy, and strategic communications. It combines content analysis of leading international media, comparative analysis of governmental and non-governmental case studies, and an indicator-based methodology drawing on the Brand Finance Global Soft Power Index, Anholt–Ipsos Nation Brands Index, FutureBrand Country Index, and Edelman Trust Barometer. The article systematizes the main stages of Ukraine’s image formation in the international information space and identifies four key periods: 1991–2003 – a phase of low recognition; 2004–2013 – the rise of a democratic image following the Orange Revolution; 2014–2021 – the consolidation of Ukraine’s reputation as a state defending freedom and European values; and from 2022 onward – the transformation of Ukraine into a symbol of resilience, bravery, and global leadership. The study demonstrates that the key determinants of positive change include public diplomacy, creative industries, volunteer initiatives, active digital communication through social media (Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube), and institutional collaboration between the state and civil society. The role of cultural diplomacy, educational projects, and national-patriotic practices is substantiated as a vital component of the country’s soft power. It is concluded that Ukraine’s image has evolved from a peripheral perception into a systemic factor of international positioning. Its effectiveness is ensured through the synergy of governmental, regional, and civic actors, the integration of communication into public policy, and reliance on measurable indicators of trust. The article proposes an operational model for state brand development – “policy–performance–messaging–perception–trust” – which connects institutional resilience, digital diplomacy, cultural representation, and behavioral metrics. The findings have practical significance for improving the effectiveness of state image policy, designing a unified national communication strategy, and strengthening Ukraine’s reputational resilience in the global information space.

https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.10.15
PDF

References

1. Anholt, S. (2010). Public diplomacy and place branding: Where’s the link?. In Places: Identity, Image and Reputation (pp. 94–102). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-25128-1_8

2. Anholt, S. (2020). The Good Country Equation: How We Can Repair the World in One Generation. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/The_Good_Country_Equation.html?id=IXTDDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

3. Chechel, O. Yu. (2016). Formuvannia imidzhu derzhavy na mizhnarodnii areni [Formation of the state’s image on the international arena]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, (10), 82–86. http://www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=5029&i=17 (in Ukrainian)

4. Dziuba, O. (2020). Formuvannia pozytyvnoho kulturnoho imidzhu krainy (na prykladi Nimechchyny) [Formation of the country’s positive image on the example of Germany]. International Relations: Theory and Practical Aspects, (5), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-745x.5.2020.203712 (in Ukrainian)

5. Ipsos. (2023). Nation Brands Index 2023: Japan takes the lead for the first time in NBI history. https://www.ipsos.com/en/nation-brands-index-2023

6. Jagodzinski, K. (2024). Global Soft Power Index 2024 – A world in flux. Brand Finance. https://brandfinance.com/insights/global-soft-power-index-2024-a-world-in-flux

7. Kleijssen, J. (2019). Countering disinformation with smart standards: The Council of Europe perspective. Security and Human Rights Monitor. https://lnk.ua/R4aMEkY4J

8. Madryha, T. (2024). Natsionalnyi brend Ukrainy yak zasib komunikatsii v umovakh povnomasshtabnoi viiny The National Brand of Ukraine as a Means of Communication under Conditions of Full-Scale War. Visnyk Prykarpatskoho universytetu. Seriia: Politolohiia – Bulletin of the Precarpathian University. Series: Political Science, (17), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-1815/2024-17-13 (in Ukrainian)

9. Rucka, W., De Cock, R., & Smits, T. (2023). Nation branding in times of refugee crisis: Digital media practices of Belgian and Swedish governmental institutions. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 3(2), 1-26. http://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2023.3.2.001

10. Rudnieva, A., & Maliovana, Yu. (2022). Imidzh Ukrainy v umovakh suchasnykh informatsiinykh protsesiv: tsyfrovoi transformatsii ta stanovlennia elektronnoho uriaduvannia [Image of Ukraine in the conditions of modern information processes: Digital transformation and the formation of e-government]. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Philosophical-Political Studies, (42), 320–327.https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2022.42.42 (in Ukrainian)

11. Stepyko, M. T. (2020). Ukrainska identychnist u hlobalizovanomu sviti [Ukrainian identity in a globalized world]. Kharkiv: Maidan. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2020-06/ukrainska-identichnist-u-globalizovanomu-sviti.pdf (in Ukrainian)

12. Sviderska, O. I., Naumenko, D. V., & Androsov, A. O. (2025). Praktyky stratehichnykh komunikatsii u formuvanni obrazu viiskovo-politychnoho kerivnytstva derzhavy v umovakh rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny [Practices of strategic communication in shaping the image of military-political leadership of the state in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war]. Current Problems of Philosophy and Sociology, (55), 306–311. https://doi.org/10.32782/apfs.v055.2025.46 (in Ukrainian)

13. Zelenskyy, V. (2022, April 7). Being brave is our brand; we will spread our courage in the world [Video address]. Official website of the President of Ukraine. https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/buti-smilivimi-ce-nash-brend-budemo-poshiryuvati-nashu-smili-74165

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Olga Denysiuk