Keywords
foreign policy
Euro-Atlantic community
geopolitical transformation
Central Asia
Eastern Partnership
war in Ukraine
How to Cite
Abstract
The relevance of this study lies in the radical transformations of the geopolitical landscape of the post-Soviet space, triggered by the prolonged aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. The war has served as a catalyst for the rethinking of foreign policy strategies by numerous former Soviet republics. Against the backdrop of Russia’s weakening status as a geopolitical actor, countries in Central Asia, the South Caucasus, and the Eastern Partnership have increasingly pursued diversified foreign policy trajectories. The objective of this research is to identify and systematize key trends in the behavior of post-Soviet states in response to the shifting balance of power in the international system caused by Russia’s war against Ukraine. The study employs comparative historical analysis, case study methodology, elements of geopolitical analysis, and inductive reasoning to derive general patterns from empirical observations. Findings indicate a growing tendency among post-Soviet countries to engage in foreign policy maneuvering and reduce their dependence on Russia. Armenia has initiated a strategic rapprochement with the United States, Azerbaijan has expelled Russian peacekeepers from Karabakh, and Kazakhstan has pursued a policy of balancing between Russia, China, and the West. Similar tendencies can be observed in Georgia, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. For its part, Russia has attempted to compensate for its declining influence through military presence, energy leverage, and control over domestic political elites in neighboring states — tools that are becoming increasingly ineffective. The decline in Russian influence creates favorable conditions for a new configuration of international relations in the region. The study demonstrates that the key factor driving changes in the geopolitical orientation of post-Soviet countries is not only pressure from the Euro-Atlantic community but also the enduring resilience and resistance of Ukraine. This motivates political elites across the region to seek alternative pathways in security, economics, and international cooperation. Future empirical research on individual countries is recommended to explore strategies for further reducing Russian influence and strengthening the sovereignty of post-Soviet states within the international system.
References
1. Aitzhanova, A. (Ed.). (2014). Kazakhstan 2050: Toward a modern society for all (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://www.emergingmarketsforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Kaz-2050-Overview-Sept-17.pdf
2. Akorda.kz. (2022, September). Prezident Kasym-Zhomart Tokayev provel vstrechu s Predsedatelem KNR Si Tszin'pinom [President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev held a meeting with the Chairman of the PRC Xi Jinping]. https://www.akorda.kz/ru/prezident-kasym-zhomart-tokaev-provel-vstrechu-s-predsedatelem-knr-si-czinpinom-1482656
3. Alekseichenko, O. (2024). Viiny RF v Hruzii ta Ukraini ta yikh naslidky dlia mizhnarodnoi spilnoty [The Russian wars in Georgia and Ukraine and their consequences for the international community]. Newsletter of Precarpathian University. Politology , (18), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-1815/2024-18-4
4. Alekseychenko, O. (2025). Chy mozhlyvyy heopolitychnyy revansh Rosiyi na Pivdennomu Kavkazi: Keys Hruziyi [Is Russia’s geopolitical revenge possible in the South Caucasus: The case of Georgia]. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. International Relations, 1(60), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2292.2025/1-60/80-84
5. AP News. (2024, January 15). Russia begins withdrawing peacekeeping forces from Karabakh, now under full Azerbaijan control. https://apnews.com/article/russia-azerbaijan-withdrawal-f60ed4e9ca5e78c071b77a2fa57cd765
6. Astana Economic Forum. (2019). Kazakhstan and the global world: Challenges and opportunities. Nur-Sultan.
7. Baku Dialogues Journal. (2025, January 10). Special, exceptional, and privileged: Azerbaijani–Turkish relations. https://bakudialogues.idd.az/articles/special-exceptional-and-privileged-12-12-2020
8. BlackSeaNews. (2024, June 8). The Black Sea report (Part 1 NEW): Losses of the Russian Navy in the Black Sea in 2022–2024. Updated database – Black Sea Institute. https://blacksealaw.org/the-black-sea-report-part-1-new-losses-of-the-russian-navy-in-the-black-sea-in-2022-2024-updated-database/
9. Borger, J. (2021, April 24). Biden becomes first US president to recognise Armenian genocide. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/24/joe-biden-armenian-genocide-recognition
10. Buzarov, A. (2016, April 2). Kavkazkyi vuzol: Yakymy budut naslidky konfliktu v Nahirnomu Karabasi [The Caucasian knot: What will be the consequences of the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh]. RBK-Ukraina. https://daily.rbc.ua/ukr/show/kavkazskiy-uzel-kakimi-budut-posledstviya-1459761485.html
11. Buzarov, A. (2019a, May 15). “Rossiia deistvuet pokhozhe”: Mezhdunarodnik sravnil “DNR” i Pridnestrove [“Russia acts similarly”: An international expert compared “DNR” and Transnistria]. oboz.ua. https://news.obozrevatel.com/abroad/rossiya-dejstvuet-pohozhe-mezhdunarodnik-sravnil-dnr-i-pridnestrove.htm
12. Buzarov, A. (2019b, June 10). Posol Ukrainy v Tadzhikistane Vasyl Servatiuk dav interview ukrainskomu zhurnalistu Andriiu Buzarovu [Ambassador of Ukraine to Tajikistan Vasyl Servatiuk gave an interview to Ukrainian journalist Andrii Buzarov]. https://tajikistan.mfa.gov.ua/ru/news/6994-posol-ukrajini-v-respublici-tadzhikistan-vasily-servatyuk-dav-intervju-ukrajinsykomu-zhurnalistovi-andriju-buzarovu
13. Buzarov, A. (2022, March 12). Ukrainskyi politoloh pro viinu z Rossiieiu: Kazakhstan diie pravylno [Ukrainian political scientist on the war with Russia: Kazakhstan is acting correctly]. nur.kz. https://www.nur.kz/politics/kazakhstan/1959503-ukrainskiy-politolog-o-voyne-s-rossiey-kazahstan-deystvuet-pravilno/
14. Buzarov, A. (2025a). Vysokotekhnolohichna armiia, oboronni tekhnolohii, dosvid stiikosti: Synerhiia vzaiemodii Ukrainy ta yevroatlantychnoi spilnoty v umovakh viiny [High-tech army, defense technologies, resilience experience: Synergy of Ukraine’s interaction with the Euro-Atlantic community in wartime]. Ukrainskyi polityko-pravovyi dyskurs, (14). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17089911
15. Buzarov, A. (2025b). Stanovlennia formativ vzaiemodii Ukrainy ta yevroatlantychnoi spilnoty v konteksti rosijsko-ukrainskoi viiny (period: liutyi 2014 – liutyi 2022) [Formation of interaction formats between Ukraine and the Euro-Atlantic community in the context of the Russo-Ukrainian war (period: February 2014 – February 2022)]. Empirio, 2(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.18523/3041-1718.2025.2.1.67-77
16. Buzarov, A. (2025c, September 15). Viina, demokratiia i maibutnie Kazakhstanu: Chesna rozmova pro vyklyky i shansy [War, democracy, and the future of Kazakhstan: An honest conversation about challenges and opportunities]. Ulysmedia.kz. https://ulysmedia.kz/ulys-tv/53345-voina-demokratiia-i-budushchee-kazakhstana-chestnyi-razgovor-o-vyzovakh-i-shansakh
17. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2024a, July 15). Armenia navigates a path away from Russia. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/07/armenia-navigates-a-path-away-from-russia?lang=en
18. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2024b, October 10). Cooperation between China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia: Current and potential future threats to America. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/10/cooperation-between-china-iran-north-korea-and-russia-current-and-potential-future-threats-to-america?lang=en
19. Chatham House. (2025, September 1). China is using the SCO summit and Victory Day parade to showcase its vision of a new world order. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/09/china-using-sco-summit-and-victory-day-parade-showcase-its-vision-new-world-order
20. Commonspace.eu. (2020, November 10). Document: Full text of the agreement between the leaders of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. https://www.commonspace.eu/news/document-full-text-agreement-between-leaders-russia-armenia-and-azerbaijan
21. Deutsche Welle. (2012, June 28). Uzbekistan pryiostanavlyvaet chlenstvo v ODKB [Uzbekistan suspends membership in the CSTO]. https://lnk.ua/xNKQbDje8
22. Deutsche Welle. (2025, April 4). ES provozglasil "novuyu eru" v otnosheniyakh s Tsentral'noy Aziey [The EU proclaimed a "new era" in relations with Central Asia]. https://www.dw.com/ru/es-provozglasil-novuu-eru-v-otnoseniah-s-centralnoj-aziej/a-72140006
23. Deyermond, R. (2013). Assessing the reset: Successes and failures in the Obama administration’s Russia policy, 2009–2012. European Security, 22(4), 500–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2013.777704
24. Dickinson, P. (2021, August 7). The 2008 Russo-Georgian War: Putin’s green light. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/the-2008-russo-georgian-war-putins-green-light/
25. Doroshko, M. (2023). Henotsydni viiny Lenina – Stalina – Putina v Ukraini [Genocidal wars of Lenin, Stalin, and Putin in Ukraine]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Nika-Centr.
26. Ebel, F., & Choi, M. (2025, August 8). Trump presides over Armenia–Azerbaijan peace framework, upstaging Russia. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/08/08/azerbaijan-armenia-nagorno-karabakh-trump/
27. European Commission. (2009, May 7). Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/pres_09_78
28. Fenton, N., & Kolyandr, A. (2025, March 10). Down but not out: The Russian economy under Western sanctions. CSIS. https://www.csis.org/analysis/down-not-out-russian-economy-under-western-sanctions
29. Fond hromadskoyi dyplomatiyi. (2025a). Analitychnyi daidzhest “Tsentralna Aziia v systemi novoho bahatopoliarnoho svitovoho poriadku” [Analytical digest “Central Asia in the system of a new multipolar world order”]. https://civildiplomat.com/analytic/8191
30. Fond hromadskoyi dyplomatiyi. (2025b). The C+C5 format as a new stage in China’s cooperation with Central Asia. https://civildiplomat.com/analytic/the-cc5-format-as-a-new-stage-in-chinas-cooperation-with-central-asia
31. German Marshall Fund of the United States. (2024, June 20). Russian meddling in Moldova. https://www.gmfus.org/news/russian-meddling-moldova
32. Global Panorama. (2025, August 15). What is behind the deterioration of Russian–Azerbaijan relations, and future implications. https://www.globalpanorama.org/en/2025/08/what-is-behind-the-deterioration-of-russian-azerbaijan-relations-and-future-implications-nigar-gurbanli-and-anar-valiyev/
33. Hai-Nyzhnyk, P. (2024a). “Neonatsyzm” u publichnii rytorytsi V. Putina: Dynamika sensovykh zmin (2004 – pochatok 2022 rr.) [“Neo-Nazism” in V. Putin’s Public Rhetoric: Dynamics of Meaningful Changes (2004 — early 2022)]. Political Studies / Ukraine, 1(7), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.53317/2786-4774-2024-1-6
34. Hai-Nyzhnyk, P. (2024b). “Odnopoliarnist” i “bahatopoliarnist” svitu: Naratyvy publichnykh manipuliatsii V. Putina (2000–2008 rr.) [“Unipolarity” and “Multipolarity” of the World: Narratives of V. Putin’s Public Manipulations (2000–2008)]. Political Studies / Ukraine, 2(8), 116–136. http://pd.ipiend.gov.ua/article/view/315763
35. Hawkins, A. (2025, September 2). Putin hails ties with China as Kim Jong-un arrives in Beijing on eve of parade. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/02/vladimir-putin-xi-jinping-russia-china-ties-kim-jong-un-beijing-parade
36. Haxhiaj, S. (2024, June 12). British Brigadier recalls ‘World War Three’ moment in Kosovo. Balkan Insight. https://balkaninsight.com/2024/06/12/british-brigadier-recalls-world-war-three-moment-in-kosovo/
37. Horbulin, V. (Ed.). (2017). Svitova hibrydna viina: Ukrainskyi front [World hybrid war: The Ukrainian front]. Kyiv, Ukraine: NISD. http://resource.history.org.ua/item/0013707
38. Hrytsak, Y. (2023). Podolaty mynule: Hlobalna istoriia Ukrainy [Overcoming the past: A global history of Ukraine] (8th ed.). Kyiv, Ukraine: Portal.
39. IISS. (2025, February 5). Combat losses and manpower challenges underscore the importance of ‘mass’ in Ukraine. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/military-balance/2025/02/combat-losses-and-manpower-challenges-underscore-the-importance-of-mass-in-ukraine/
40. Institute for Security and Development Policy. (2018). Modernization and regional cooperation in Central Asia. https://www.isdp.eu/publication/modernization-and-regional-cooperation-in-central-asia-a-new-spring/
41. Kennan Institute. (2025, March 20). The rise of the Turkic world in Eurasian geopolitics. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/rise-turkic-world-eurasian-geopolitics
42. Khodorkovskii, M. (2023). Kak ubit drakona? [How to kill a dragon?]. https://dragonbook.khodorkovsky.com/
43. Kondratenko, O. (2019). Heostratehiia Rosiiskoi Federatsii: Teoretychni zasady i praktychna realizatsiia [Geostrategy of the Russian Federation: Theoretical foundations and practical implementation]. https://uacademic.info/ua/document/0519U000187
44. Kotkin, S. (2008). Armageddon averted: The Soviet collapse, 1970–2000 (Updated ed.). Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/details/armageddonaverte0000kotk
45. Kotkin, S. (2016). Russia’s perpetual geopolitics. Foreign Affairs, 95(3). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukraine/2016-04-18/russias-perpetual-geopolitics
46. Kuchma, L. (2023). Ukraina — ne Rossiia: Dvadtsiat rokiv potomu [Ukraine is not Russia: Twenty years later]. Kyiv: VD “ADEF-Ukraina”.
47. Kuzio, T. (2018). Viina Putina proty Ukrainy: Revoliutsiia, natsionalizm i kryminalitet [Putin’s war against Ukraine: Revolution, nationalism, and crime]. Kyiv, Ukraine: UINP.
48. Lipkan, V. (2025). Heostratehiia Ukrainy v umovakh transformatsii mizhnarodnoho poriadku: Teoriia i praktyka [Geostrategy of Ukraine in the context of transformation of the international order: Theory and practice] [Doctoral dissertation, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv]. Kyiv, Ukraine. https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Lipkan_Volodymyr/Heostratehiia_Ukrainy_v_umovakh_transformatsii_mizhnarodnoho_poriadku_teoriia_i_praktyka.pdf
49. Livinska, Y. (2022). Zbroini konflikty za uchastiu Rosiiskoi Federatsii v Nahirnomu Karabasi, Prydnistrovii, Hruzii ta v Ukraini v ukrainskii istoriohrafii. Humanities Science Current Issues, 1(49), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/49-1-5
50. Lysianskyi, P., & Yastreboha, V. (2022). Stvorennia RF kvaziderzhavnykh utvorenʹ yak instrument destabilizatsii politychnoi sytuatsii Ukrainy [Creation of RF quasi-state entities as a tool for destabilizing the political situation in Ukraine]. Visnyk Lvivskoho Universytetu, (45), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2022.45.18
51. Maiboroda, O. (2025). Vlada i hromadianske suspilstvo u krainakh svitu: Dosvid vzaiemodii [Power and civil society in the countries of the world: Experience of interaction]. Kyiv, Ukraine: IPEND NAN Ukrainy.
52. McFaul, M. (2000, March 3). Indifferent to democracy. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPcap/2000-03/03/065r-030300-idx.html?itid=lk_inline_manual_20
53. Mirziyoev, Sh. (2021, February 12). My reshytel’no prodolzhim kurs demokratycheskykh reform na osnove strategyy razvitiya Novogo Uzbekystana [We will resolutely continue the course of democratic reforms based on the development strategy of New Uzbekistan]. https://president.uz/ru/lists/view/4743
54. Munich Security Conference. (2025). Selected key speeches: 1963–2024. https://securityconference.org/en/publications/books/selected-key-speeches-i/
55. Munteanu, I. (2009). Post-electoral Moldova in the search for legitimacy. SEER, 12(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-2869-2009-1-9
56. NATO. (2008, April 3). NATO decision on open-door policy. https://www.nato.int/docu/update/2008/04-april/e0403h.html
57. Nazarbaev, N. (2017). Era nezavisimosti [Era of independence]. Astana, Kazakhstan: QAZaqparat.
58. Ó Beacháin, D. (2009). Roses and Tulips: Dynamics of regime change in Georgia and Kyrgyzstan. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 25(2–3), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270902860550
59. Plokhii, S. (2023). Rosiisko-ukrainska viina: Povernennia istorii [Russo-Ukrainian war: The return of history]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Nash Format.
60. Rakhmon, E. (2022, October 15). “My khotim, chtoby nas uvažali”: Emomali Rakhmon raskritikoval Putina za otnoshenie k Tadzhikistanu i Tsentral'noy Azii kak v SSSR [“We want to be respected”: Emomali Rahmon criticized Putin for treating Tajikistan and Central Asia as in the USSR]. Nastoyashchee Vremya. https://www.currenttime.tv/a/rahmon-raskritikoval-putina-za-otnoshenie-k-tj-i-ca-kak-v-sssr/32084502.html
61. Reuters. (2024, February 23). Armenia freezes participation in Russia-led security bloc — Prime Minister. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/armenia-freezes-participation-russia-led-security-bloc-prime-minister-2024-02-23/
62. Rozumnyi, M. (2018). Imperʹskyi revansh: Sproba Putina [Imperial revanche: Putin’s attempt]. Politolohichnyi Visnyk, (80), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2018.80.68-76
63. Rudyh, F. (2007). U kolorakh “pomaranchevoi revoliutsii” [In the colors of the “Orange Revolution”]. TOV UVPK “EksOb”.
64. RUSI. (2022, January 10). Russia’s response to unrest in Kazakhstan: Risk versus reward. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/russias-response-unrest-kazakhstan-risk-versus-reward
65. Sarkozy. (2008, August 12). Six-point peace plan for the Georgia-Russia conflict. https://www.iccn.ge/files/sarkozy_6point_plan_2008.pdf
66. Speck, U. (2016). The West’s response to the Ukraine conflict: A transatlantic success story. German Marshall Fund of the United States. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep19027
67. The Moscow Times. (2020, August 27). Putin forms law enforcement ‘reserve’ on standby for Belarus. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/08/27/putin-forms-law-enforcement-reserve-on-standby-for-belarus-a71260
68. U.S. Department of State. (2015, November 1). Joint Declaration of Partnership and Cooperation by the Five Countries of Central Asia and The United States of America, Samarkand, Uzbekistan. https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2015/11/249050.htm
69. Ukrinform. (2024, March 10). Ne slid zobrazhuvaty Hruziiu v informprostori yak prorosiisku, tse ne vidpovidaie diisnosti — ekspert [It should not be portrayed in the information space that Georgia is pro-Russian, this does not correspond to reality — expert]. https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/3920412-ne-slid-zobrazuvati-gruziu-v-informprostori-ak-prorosijsku-ce-ne-vidpovidae-dijsnosti-ekspert.html
70. United Nations. (1995, December 12). Permanent neutrality of Turkmenistan: Resolution. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/284240
71. Urse, S. (2007). Transnistria: Prospects for a solution. https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/occasional-papers/transnistria-prospects-solution
72. USAID. (2010). Moldova democracy and governance assessment. https://democracyinternational.com/media/Moldova%20Democracy%20and%20Governance%20Assessment.pdf
73. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2025, January 15). Pro zasady derzhavnoi polityky natsionalnoi pam’iati Ukrainskoho narodu [On the principles of the state policy of national memory of the Ukrainian people]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/4579-20
74. Wintour, P., & Traynor, I. (1999, June 13). Russian and British troops in tense Pristina stand-off. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/jun/13/balkans5
75. World Bank. (2020). South Caucasus and Central Asia: The Belt and Road Initiative Kazakhstan country case study. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/471731593499938164/pdf/South-Caucasus-and-Central-Asia-The-Belt-and-Road-Initiative-Kazakhstan-Country-Case-Study.pdf
76. Yergin, D. (2020). The new map: Energy, climate, and the clash of nations (1st ed.). Penguin Press.
77. Zarifi, K. (2014). Tadzhikistan – Kitay: Stanovlenie gosudarstvennoy granitsy. Istoriya i sovremennost' [Tajikistan — China: The formation of the state border. History and modernity]. Dushanbe, Tajikistan: Irfon.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Andrii Buzarov