Keywords
political processes
social conflicts
interethnic relations
economic discrimination
disinformation
incitement of hatred
institutional reforms
economic development
state policy
How to Cite
Abstract
This article focuses on the analysis of the interaction between political processes and ethnic groups, with a particular emphasis on the causes of and strategies for resolving interethnic conflicts. The study employs an interdisciplinary approach, combining elements of political science, sociology, and other analytical perspectives. Among the key factors considered in the work are uneven distribution of power and resources between ethnic groups; limited access to economic opportunities for certain ethnic groups; and differences in language, religion, and traditions, which can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. The article also presents ways to resolve interethnic conflicts, which include political science dialogue through the creation of platforms for open and constructive dialogue between representatives of different ethnic groups, the process of implementing programs aimed at reducing economic inequality and creating jobs, and promoting intercultural dialogue and exchange, which promotes mutual understanding and tolerance. The goal is to identify the main problems and factors that affect the effectiveness of the interaction of political processes and ethnic groups. The study is aimed at finding ways to improve interethnic confrontation and policies at the regional and national levels. The study used such methods as comparative analysis, statistical review, and methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the adoption of relevant programs. Among the key conclusions, it is worth noting: interethnic conflicts are a complex phenomenon that has deep historical, political, economic, and cultural roots; resolving interethnic conflicts requires a multilateral and comprehensive approach and includes the participation of all stakeholders; an important point is to counteract the spread of disinformation and incitement of interethnic hatred through the media.
References
1. Bondarenko, V. (2021). Aspekty formuvannia Budzhakskoi etnopolitychnoi dylemy ta politetnichnoi problemy derzhavnoho etnichnoho upravlinnia: bolharskyi chynnyk [Aspects of the formation of the Budzhak ethno-political dilemma and the political ethnic problem of state ethnic governance: Bulgarian factor]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, 9(6), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.15421/152169
2. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://www.jstor.org/stable/422690
3. Horowitz, D. (1997). Self-determination: Politics, philosophy, and law. In I. Shapiro & W. Kymlicka (Ed.), Ethnicity and Group Rights: Nomos XXXIX (pp. 421–463). New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814788851.003.0019
4. Kvitka, S. (2020). Tsyfrovi transformatsii yak suchasnyi trend periodychnoho tsyklu rozvytku suspilstva [Digital transformation as a modern trend of the periodic cycle of development of society]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy, (Special Issue), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.36030/2664-3618-2020-si-131-134
5. Kvitka, S., & Karpenko, O. (2022). Vplyv tsyfrovizatsii na derzhavne upravlinnia u sferi protydii mizhnatsionalnym konfliktam [The impact of digitalization on public administration in the field of combating interethnic conflicts]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, 10(5), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.15421/152236
6. Lutsyshyn, H. I. (2014). Rol etnichnoho chynnyka u vynyknenni mizhderzhavnykh prykordonnykh konfliktiv [The role of the ethnic factor in the emergence of interstate border conflicts]. Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 18(10), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.15421/1715188
7. Maiboroda, O. (Ed.). (2002). Spryiannia poshyrenniu tolerantnosti u polietnichnomu suspilstvi [Promoting tolerance in a polyethnic society]. Kyiv: Yevropa-XXI. (in Ukrainian)
8. Makarov, H. (2022). Etnichnyi chynnyk reforuvannia administratyvno-terytorialnoho ustroiu: dosvid yevropeiskykh demokratychnykh derzhav [Ethnic factor of reforming the administrative-territorial structure: the experience of European democratic states]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, 10(5), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.15421/152235
9. Rymarenko, Y. I., et al. (Eds.). (1998). Mihratsiini protsesy v suchasnomu sviti: svitovyi, rehionalnyi ta natsionalnyi vymiry [Migration processes in the modern world: Global, regional, and national dimensions]. Kyiv: Dovira. (in Ukrainian)
10. Shvetsov, M. L. (Ed.). (2006). Rol etnichnykh spilnot Donechchyny v rozbudovi ukrainskoi derzhavnosti [The role of ethnic communities of Donetsk region in building Ukrainian statehood]. Donetsk: Veber. (in Ukrainian)
11. Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1978). Comparison of four instruments measuring conflict behavior. Psychological Reports, 42(3), 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.42.3c.1139
12. Vitman, K. M. (2009). Krymski tatary – natsionalna menshyna chy korinnyi narod? [Crimean Tatars – national minority or indigenous people?]. Derzhava i pravo, (45), 563–571. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/11337
13. Yevtukh, V. (2006). Sotsiolohiia mizhetnichnoho konfliktu: teoretychnyi aspekt [Sociology of interethnic conflict: theoretical aspect]. Politychnyi menedzhment, (6), 3–17. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/PoMe_2006_6_3
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Olena Banchuk-Petrosova, Yuliia Kobets, Oleksandr Solonenko