Keywords
“conscious-subconscious”
fractality
recursive level
cognitive neuroscience
Sufism
“science-mysticism”
integrative paradigm
How to Cite
Abstract
The article presents an interdisciplinary study of the phenomenon of meta-consciousness at the intersection of philosophy, cognitive neuroscience, and mystical tradition. The aim is to integrate analytical, phenomenological, and spiritual-hermeneutical approaches to construct a unified model of meta-consciousness as a recursive process of self-observation. The object of the research is meta-consciousness as a multilevel phenomenon of human cognition that combines neurophysiological, cognitive, phenomenological, and mystical dimensions of self-awareness. The subject of the research is the integrative structure and mechanisms of the formation of meta-consciousness, in particular, the interaction between bodily-emotional, cognitive, and hermeneutic-mystical levels of self-observation, which ensure recursive self-knowledge and the experience of presence. It is noted that in classical European philosophy, the concept of consciousness underwent significant transformations – from the Cartesian cogito as the core of subjectivity to Husserl’s phenomenological description of intentionality. However, in both cases, consciousness was considered as a phenomenon centered around the knowing “I.” Contemporary cognitive philosophy expands this horizon by introducing the concept of “meta-consciousness,” that is, awareness of the very process of being aware. Drawing on philosophical (Husserl, Ricoeur, Merleau-Ponty), cognitive-scientific (Varela, Metzinger, Thompson), and mystical (Rumi, Ibn ‘Arabi, Suzuki) sources, the author proposes a conceptual framework encompassing three levels: the core of consciousness – neurophysiological mechanisms of self-observation; the bodily-emotional field – integration of sensory and affective data; the recursive level – mystical processes of self-presence. Meta-consciousness is interpreted as a fractal structure, where each layer of experience reflects and reproduces others, forming a dynamic continuum of “awareness of awareness.” This model unites scientific rigor with existential depth, demonstrating that consciousness not only mirrors reality but also constitutes it through the act of presence. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of an integrative ontological–fractal model of meta-consciousness, which enables the synthesis of bodily, cognitive, and spiritual dimensions within a unified theoretical system.
References
1. Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(21), 8719–8724. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900234106
2. Damasio, Antonio R. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York: Pantheon.
3. Dunne, J. D., Thompson, E., & Schooler, J. (2019). Mindful meta-awareness: sustained and non-propositional. Current opinion in psychology, (28), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.003
4. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
5. Husserl, E. (1950). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff.
6. Ibn ‘Arabi. (1980). Futuhat al-Makkiyya (Vol. 2). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya.
7. Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, (28), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.005
8. Lambie, J. A., & Marcel, A. J. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework. Psychological Review, 109(2), 219–259. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2002-12576-002
9. Metzinger, T. (2003). Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. MIT Press.
10. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11. Mishchykha, L. P. (2025). Samousvidomlennia yak psykholohichnyi fenomen [Self-awareness as a psychological phenomenon]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Psychology Series, (1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.1.3 (in Ukrainian)
12. Murashkin, M. (2022). “Vidchutne transtsendente” i “Prypynennia” yak vyshchyi stan svidomosti (relihiieznavchyi analiz) [“Tangible transcendent” and “termination” as the higher state of consciousness (religious analysis)]. Grani, 25(1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.15421/17225 (in Ukrainian)
13. Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation (J. B. Thompson, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
14. Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative (Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.
15. Rumi, J. al-Din. (2008). Masnavi, Book VI (J. Mojaddedi, Trans.). Penguin Classics. https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780192874283.001.0001
16. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(8), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01949-6
17. Suzuki, D. T. (1973). Zen mind, beginner’s mind. Weatherhill.
18. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press.
19. Timmermann, C., et al. (2023). A neurophenomenological approach to non-ordinary states of consciousness: Hypnosis, meditation, and psychedelics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.11.006
20. Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349. https://unstable.nl/andreas/ai/langcog/part3/varela_npmrhp.pdf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nina Bilokopytova